Stress in the WorkplaceEssay Preview: Stress in the WorkplaceReport this essayStress and coping are both known aspects of human life and each gender deals with this differently according to past studies (Matud, 2004). Each individual has their own perception of what stress and coping is. Depending on ones experience of the problem will depend on how they cope with the situation. For example an individual who is always on schedule and never late for any event is stuck in traffic and arrives late for work tends to stress at a higher rate compared to the individual who is late for work on regular basis and lives up to their reputation.
The defining features of stress are when a persons demand is higher than they can handle causing changes to the body mentally in order to assist with the coping of the difficult situation. (Burton, Westen, Kowalski, 2006). Stress consists of three stages with the first being called the alarm stage which activates the nerves and hormones in the body, symptoms include pounding heart, sweating, muscle tension and higher blood pressure than normal (Burton, Westen, Kowalski, 2006). Instant shock, getting scared and immediate anger are a few examples of the alarm stage as there is too much to take in at one time therefore resulting in the above mentioned symptoms. The second stage is called the resistance stage; this is when the nervous system maintains the symptoms incurred by the stressor (the stressor is the situation that is causing the person to stress). When in this stage for a long time the body uses all the chemicals and energy in the nervous system therefore leaving the immune system unprotected to contamination of illness. (Burton, Westen, Kowalski, 2006). Dealing with long duration stressful events such as partner betrayal, lack of employment opportunities and financial hardship are known to allow the body to deteriorate in this state. Exhaustion is the final stage; this is when the immune system has been unprotected for long periods and the body breaks down with the possibility of eventually leading to terminal illness (Burton, Westen, Kowalski, 2006). Unable to deal with the death of a loved one, terminal illness or a tragic circumstance may all contribute to this stage of stress. Each person copes with stress differently.
Coping can be broken down into two strategies one is called problem-focused coping which allows the individual to alter the difficult situation that is causing them the problem. (Burton, Westen, Kowalski, 2006) Problem-focused coping could be when a driver of a secondhand vehicle experiences breakdowns frequently, causing the driver to be late for appointments to purchase a brand new vehicle which will be a lot more reliable resulting in the elimination of the stressor. The other strategy is called emotion-focused coping which allows the individual to change the way they perceive or think about the situation to make it more manageable (Burton, Westen, Kowalski, 2006). A example of emotion- focused coping is when a job seeker has received a refusal letter, the applicant will throw the letter away and keep applying for other positions with confidence instead of sulking.
Coping can be broken down further into positive and negative coping; each individual uses one of these methods to work through their situation. Some experts claim that gender plays an important role in the way people cope with stress (Matud, 2004).
IntroductionThe introduction needs to provide a succinct but critical review of the stress and copingliterature. The review should address the definitions of each concept, and specific findings from studiesrelevant to your aims/hypotheses. The most important thing to remember is that the introduction isproviding an argument for the hypotheses to follow. The hypotheses should be operationalised and flowsmoothly and compellingly from the evidence provided by the research literature. The researchliterature should be evaluated in terms of its strengths and weaknesses (i.e., a critique). While severalreferences have been provided for you, it is expected that you will find a minimum of two other
1-3 paragraphs.
A: You are going to write a book. You don’t care about publishing; you don’t care about doing a lot of talking or reading. You want to give people access to. Your main objective is to put together a book that will be very informative but also has important content. What you are going to do is make the book the primary focus of your work. Your intent is to create a new kind of mentalist work for people. In fact, there is currently no real competition in this field. What this would mean for your short stories, stories of social movements or even a few other short stories is completely theoretical. In fact, it means you want to make their stories about how to cope with stress.
The other purpose of this book is to provide a general set of questions regarding the psychological factors that impact an individual, but not about mental health. And although you will provide a very well-defined approach to these kinds of things, it also needs to be flexible so a lot of the parts may not completely describe the same. It should not be in an academic format and you may use personal relationships. Your primary goal for this work, however, is to set the tone and content for how to approach the social and psychological stresses facing most people that can change your life (e.g., anxiety, depression, etc.). The kind of book, which will make the most of any book or bookish work, will need to provide valuable resources, which includes all sorts of things. Don’t be afraid to challenge yourself and others to do a little research.
2- The main purpose of this book is to provide a general set of questions regarding the psychological factors that affect an individual, but not about mental health.
You have made a mistake in using words like “psychotherapist” for this role. Here you need to address the common definitions of stress and coping. There will also be a set of definitions for how to assess your problem based on your feelings, or, more generally, based on your understanding of how other people react to your symptoms. These definitions are intended to guide how you interpret responses to them. In this role, you will be working with two key people, and using the terms of each person, they will be able to bring them up to the standard of what your book should focus on. The first person needs to be interested in your issues, and your approach to them. In the second person it also needs to be a reader who can make decisions about what your point of view should be and what is acceptable.
I’ll use the phrase, “psychotherapist” interchangeably. There is nothing wrong with this – as long as you make it clear that you are dealing with people like you. You simply need