Jane Austen – Pride And Prejudice
Essay Preview: Jane Austen – Pride And Prejudice
Report this essay
In the novel, Pride and Prejudice, Jane Austen asserts that a happy marriage comes not from the compliance with social conventions, but rather from the compatibility between the personalities of two individuals. The interclass marriage of Mr. and Mrs. Bennet, and the expected “intraclass” marriage of Lady Catherines daughter stand as a foil to the true happiness in the interclass marriage of Elizabeth and Mr. Darcy. A lack of affection, esteem and congruity between the Bennets, and likewise between Miss de Bourgh and Mr. Darcy, results in an unsuccessful marriage and a potentially unsuccessful marriage, respectively, while the paradigm of these qualities between Elizabeth and Mr. Darcy generate a successful relationship. By illustrating that happiness and unhappiness in marriage overlook the boundaries of the class system, Austen emphasizes the individual and thus challenges the English class system.
Although the most commended marriage in the novel involves individuals from separate classes, Jane Austen does not deny that marriages across classes can turn out less than satisfactory. Mr. Bennet, who is of a higher class than Mrs. Bennet, depicts this unfortunate side of interclass marriages. However, the reasoning behind the misfortune lies not in their distinct classes, but rather in his imprudence in realizing the disagreeability of their personalities. Austen explains that when he was young, Mr. Bennet,
captivated by youth and beauty, and that appearance of good humour which youth and beauty generally give, had married a woman whose weak understanding and illiberal mind had very early in their marriage put an end to all real affection for her. Respect, esteem, and confidence had vanished forever, and all his views of domestic happiness were overthrown. (228)
This synopsis of the past forces the reader to acknowledge that the clashing of character early on was the cause of unhappiness, rather than differences in class. In the text, the author describes Mr. Bennet as an, “odd mixture of quick parts, sarcastic humor, reserve and caprice,” with a book in hand “regardless of time” (7, 14). On the other hand, Mrs. Bennet presents herself as a woman of “mean understanding, little information and uncertain temper” so much as to not understand her husbands character even after 23 years of marriage (14). Her ignorance and his wit clear the pathway for the mutual disparagement expressed in the novel. E. Zimmerman argues that their different life goals account for much of the incompatibility. He points out that while Mrs. Bennets sole occupation is gossiping and gaining news of potential husbands for her daughters with a determination to marry them off as soon as possible, Mr. Bennet has a less serious purpose in life. His opinion, that we live “to make sport for our neighbors and laugh at them in our turn,” clashes significantly with Mrs. Bennets goal in life which is devoid of humor (Zimmerman 66). This disagreement of parts and interests, not their different social classes, fuels their disregard for one another. An example of Mrs. Bennets unhappiness with her husband further depicts this clash of characters. When Mrs. Bennet asks her husband to persuade Elizabeth into marrying Mr. Collins, Mr. Bennet first pretends to comply with her request, but then acts contrary to her desire. This situation illustrates Mr. Bennets lack of respect for his wifes character, and leaves Mrs. Bennet furiously disappointed and angry with her husband. When identifying the moments of incompatibility between Mr. and Mrs. Bennet, Austen emphasizes the follies of their character in regard to one another rather than in light of their social class, thus depreciating the value given to social status in early nineteenth century England.
The character of Lady Catherine de Bourgh, as a wealthy aristocrat in the novel, attempts to restore the value of social status and the consequent obligations of ones status. Austen utilizes Lady Catherines expectation of her daughters and Mr. Darcys marriage to demonstrate how social conventions of marriage and obligation will not bring about a fruitful marriage without a mutual fondness between the individuals involved. When Elizabeth first sees Miss de Bourgh, she describes her as “pale and sickly [and] her features, though not plain, were insignificant; and she spoke very little” (159). This description wholly lacks the “liveliness” of Elizabeths eyes and mind with which Mr. Darcy falls in love. Mr. Darcys impartiality toward Miss de Bourgh is confirmed by Elizabeths observations of Mr. Darcy in Lady Catherines house. After listening to Lady Catherine flattering her daughter in front of Mr. Darcy, “Elizabeth looked at Darcy to see how cordially he assented to his cousins praise; but neither at that moment nor at any other could she discern any symptom of love” (172). Although Austen mentions nothing concerning Miss de Bourghs feelings, the lack of emotional attachment from at least Mr. Darcy negates the potential of a happy marriage.
Nevertheless, Lady Catherine argues with Elizabeth that the marriage of Mr. Darcy and her daughter is meant to be due to their complementary wealth and status. Austen demonstrates her disagreement with this sort of aristocratic thought through Elizabeths rebuttal, that if Mr. Darcy wishes to marry Miss de Bourgh he will, and “If Mr. Darcy is neither by honour nor inclination confined to his cousin, why is not he to make another choice?”(336). Lady Catherine furthers her argument by insulting Elizabeth in terms of her social standing, exclaiming, “Are the shades of Pemberley to be thus polluted?”(338). Albeit, Lady Catherine threatens and insults Elizabeth while explicating the due social obligations, Austen nullifies the possibility of the expected marriage owing to the absence of mutual affection between the two individuals. Austens disregard for Lady Catherines assertions strengthens the argument, that social conventions concerning marriage and obligations should not be the deciding factor in the marriage of individuals.
In contrast to the two unsuccessful marriages, Austen draws an idealized marriage between Mr. Darcy and Elizabeth. Resembling the case with Mr. and Mrs. Bennet, the marriage is interclass, yet unlike the Bennet marriage, the relationship of Mr. Darcy and Elizabeth is based on a realized compatibility, sincere regard and mutual affection.
From the point of view of nineteenth century English society, Elizabeth should concentrate on finding a husband who will provide stability for her, and Mr. Darcy should propose marriage to a woman who will compliment his wealth and status. However, both individuals rebel against these social