Othello The Just
Essay Preview: Othello The Just
Report this essay
Act i. sc. i.
ADMIRABLE is the preparation, so truly and peculiarly Shakspearian, in the introduction of Roderigo, as the dupe on whom Iago shall first exercise his art, and in so doing display his own character. Roderigo, without any fixed principle, but not without the moral notions and sympathies with honour, which his rank and connections had hung upon him, is already well fitted and predisposed for the purpose; for very want of character and strength of passion, like wind loudest in an empty house, constitute his character. The first three lines happily state the nature and foundation of the friendship between him and Iago,– the purse,–as also the contrast of Roderigos intemperance of mind with Iagos coolness,–the coolness of a preconceiving experimenter. The mere language of protestation–
If ever I did dream of such a matter, abhor me,–
which falling in with the associative link, determines Roderigos continuation of complaint–
Thou toldst me, thou didst hold him in thy hate–
elicits at length a true feeling of Iagos mind, the dread of contempt habitual to those, who encourage in themselves, and have their keenest pleasure in, the expression of con-tempt for others. Observe Iagos high self-opinion, and the moral, that a wicked man will employ real feelings, as well as assume those most alien from his own, as instru-ments of his purposes:–
—-And, by the faith of man,
I know my price, I am worth no worse a place.
I think Tyrwhitts reading of life for wife–
A fellow almost damnd in a fair wife–
the true one, as fitting to Iagos contempt for whatever did not display power, and that intellectual power. In what follows, let the reader feel how by and through the glass of two passions, disappointed vanity and envy, the very vices of which he is complaining, are made to act upon him as if they were so many excellences, and the more appropriately, because cunning is always admired and wished for by minds conscious of inward weakness;–but they act only by half, like music on an inattentive auditor, swelling the thoughts which prevent him from listening to it.
Rod. What a full fortune does the thick-lips owe,
If he can carryt thus.
Roderigo turns off to Othello; and here comes one, if not the only, seeming justification of our blackamoor or negro Othello. Even if we supposed this an uninterrupted tradition of the theatre, and that Shakspeare himself, from want of scenes, and the experience that nothing could be made too marked for the senses of his audience, had practically sanctioned it,–would this prove aught concerning his own intention as a poet for all ages? Can we imagine him so utterly ignorant as to make a barbarous negro plead royal birth,–at a time, too, when negroes were not known except as slaves?–As for Iagos language to Brabantio, it implies merely that Othello was a Moor, that is, black. Though I think the rivalry of Roderigo sufficient to account for his wilful confusion of Moor and Negro,–yet, even if compelled to give this up, I should think it only adapted for the acting of the day, and should complain of an enormity built on a single word, in direct contradiction to Iagos Barbary horse. Besides, if we could in good earnest believe Shakspeare ignorant of the distinction, still why should we adopt one disagreeable possibility instead of a ten times greater and more pleasing probability? It is a common error to mistake the epithets applied by the dramatis personae to each other, as truly descriptive of what the audience ought to see or know. No doubt Desdemona saw Othellos visage in his mind; yet, as we are constituted, and most surely as an English audience was disposed in the beginning of the seventeenth century, it would be something monstrous to conceive this beautiful Venetian girl falling in love with a veritable negro.
It would argue a disproportionateness, a want of balance, in Desdemona, which Shakspeare does not appear to have in the least contemplated.
Ib. Brabantios speech:–
This accident is not unlike my dream:–
The old careful senator, being caught careless, transfers his caution to his dreaming power at least.
Ib. Iagos speech:–
–For their souls,
Another of his fathom they have not,
To lead their business:–
The forced praise of Othello followed by the bitter hatred of him in this speech! And observe how Brabantios dream prepares for his recurrence to the notion of philtres, and how both prepare for carrying on the plot of the arraignment of Othello on this ground.
Ib. sc. 2.
Oth. Tis better as it is.
How well these few words impress at the outset the truth of Othellos own character of himself at the end– that he was not easily wrought! His self-government contradistinguishes him throughout from Leontes.
Ib. Othellos speech:–
–And my demerits
May speak, unbonnetted–
The argument in Theobalds note, where and bonnetted is suggested, goes on the assumption that Shakspeare could not use the same word differently in different places; whereas I should conclude, that as in the passage in Lear the word is employed in its direct meaning, so here it is used metaphorically; and this is confirmed by what has escaped the editors, that it is not I, but my demerits that may speak unbonnetted,–without the symbol of a petitioning inferior.
Ib. Othellos speech:–
So please your grace, my ancient;
A man he is of honesty and trust:
To his conveyance I assign my wife.
Compare this