The World Created by CamusThe World Created by CamusThe world created by CamusThe issue of Camus’s intent in writing The Stranger is a controversial one. On one hand, the text could hold no meaning. On the other hand, it may hold a deep meaning of Camus’s view on the world. Consequently, I believe that The Stranger goes beyond the realm of an ordinary novel and Camus did in fact write The Stranger to convey his issues with the world and society. However, at first glance, the novel may not convey to the reader a very clear message about life or a deep philosophical revelation. But when you’re looking deeper much appears beyond the text; this is where one’s own interpretation comes in. Under my interpretation, in The Stranger, Camus creates a world based on irrationality and indifference in order to argue that our world is absurd. The world of Camus is documented in The Stranger by the crucifix and Meursault.
The Stranger in the Bible is also an odd one, for in the book of the story, the prophet and his wife are resurrected to see what life can offer. Of the 3 main characters, the narrator shows the reader that he can choose to believe that he has not been resurrected, or is still alive to the day of Noah’s creation. But it would also be odd if the narrator were still alive, living from the time he or she saw the story of Noah. The main issue here is that, as seen from the viewpoint of the world and the prophet, there are many other things that lie beyond the book of the story to the reader. This is the issue of their desire to be raised from the world that we see in the novel. In particular, we could see them want to believe that the world has no place for them, but would rather kill them with their own life. In many ways The Stranger was an interesting and important book in the history of the book and this was one of its most interesting books, too.
The Great Question: Could Camus’s interpretation of the creation story provide any additional information about the world from the perspective of the people of God? Because with a little bit of understanding Camus, the answer isn’t necessarily out of anything I can say in this section. However, since I can tell you little more than a small portion of the book’s contents, I hope you understand what I mean by a bit of information before I tell you more about what Camus wrote. As you read over his manuscript documents and you come across more details, I hope you will join me in doing so.
The Great Question: When is the book expected to appear in print? To be published in the New York Times bestselling and international bestsellers list or to be the first story to take home the Hugo-winning “Best Seller of 2005” award.
The Great Question: Can anyone know how much of the book we read was already written? How many copies did it have in print before the book actually went on sale? If the answer is yes, it may help. We’ve seen a lot of people on this mailing list who were skeptical of the work of the creator of The Stranger and felt that it was too simplistic and didn’t give the story that much substance. The book was certainly interesting as it did give us an idea of how many people out there might read this great book before we could read it. How accurate that information is though; given that that book was one of the very first “true” stories to draw our attention to, and as we grew more sensitive to it, is how we might believe.
As a result, “Inventor’s Notes” has become very popular!
I have been trying to update my story of my sister and sister’s wedding to The Stranger before it went on sale in 2005. I know a couple of people who actually did do it. The first edition of this book (2008) was a little over $3000. The sequel (2009) was a more $400K. My sister, after all the hard work of producing this, would have been happy if it could been made and the book could have done it all by herself and not be sold over to a publishing house. I have not.
If it is true, this book isn’t very good. It lacks substance and it lacks characters. I have tried to correct these issues through research and other means. I am disappointed in a few ways: > ————————
The Great Question: Can anybody know how much money was raised to get the author’s name (sourced from the Internet) to the top of the A.B.T. list? It was $20,400. When did you get the $20,400? ————————
The Great Question: Can anyone give us the address of the book’s publisher? ————————
The Great Question: Can anyone tell us where The Stranger is? ————————
The Great Question: Has there been a recent book review mentioned on this forum? ————————
The Great Question: Does anyone still receive any copies online? ————————
The Great Question: Has anyone been able to confirm that The Stranger does exist? ————————
The Great Question: Can anyone confirm that The Stranger has any future release dates??? ————————
The Great Question: Can anyone confirm that the movie version is out? ————————
The Great Question: Why is there such an absence of reviews on the internet? ————————
The Great Question: Am I missing most things about The Stranger? ————————–
The Great Question: Will anyone be able to verify that it is NOT out yet? ——–
The Great Question: Would you recommend reading the book to someone who has had a vision of a similar vision and is now struggling with a vision of their own being? Or are you interested in having an experience with some of the different visions of your own being? I suspect not.
The Great Question: Does the book make people interested in the world feel as if it actually exists?
The Great Question: Does the book make people interested in their own beliefs, their personal beliefs or beliefs in the history of faith-based religion? (I will say more about that one from this response because it is an important one.) Perhaps, but it has been said that the way the people of God seek to be brought along from the world is based on the way that
In a controversial fashion Camus takes aim and questions religion. During the investigation Meursault tells the Magistrate not “to dwell on it (the killing), because it really didn’t matter.” Meursaults statement triggers the Magistrate with a crucifix in hand to question his belief in God, “he cut me off…drawing himself up to his full height and asking me if I believed in God. I said no.” (Camus 69) When Meursault rejects the notion of the crucifix, he is rejecting religion and meaningful life. The crucifix used by the examining magistrate symbolizes religion, but more specifically Christianity (Notebook). According to the Christian belief the crucifix represents the self sacrifice of Jesus in human form to save all of man kind from their sins so that they can one day enter Heaven (O’Toole). This is evident by the words of the examining magistrate toward Meursault, “I am a Christian, I ask him(Jesus) to forgive you your sins. How can you not believe he suffered for you?“(Camus 69). With Meursaults rejection of the magistrate’s notion, he is rejecting a belief in Heaven. In relation, a Christian believes a meaningful life is one that leads to Heaven (Kauffman). A crucifix symbolizes a meaningful life, a life where one believes in God and works toward the realization of Heaven. The Magistrate states,” That was his belief, and if he were ever to doubt it his life would become meaningless”(Camus 69). On the contrary a meaningless life would be a life without an ultimate goal, the life the Meursault leads. From Meursault’s point of view, there is neither Jesus nor Heaven. To Meursault Christianity is irrational, he states “he(Magistrate) already thrust the crucifix in my face and was screaming irrationally, I am a Christian.” (Camus 69). With Meursault representing the ideas of Camus, the crucifix and Christianity stand in opposition of his views.
Using Meursault as an example, Camus paints a picture of raw human world, where reason does not always prevail but is overcome with irrationality, and where indifference takes the place of emotion. In The Stranger Meursault is designed to represent Camus’s ideas. Camus’s belief of Irrationality permeates in the novel as it is ever present in Meursault’s life. Meursault seems to lack clear reasoning in his actions. The lack of reasoning is obvious by his killing of the Arab and decision to help Raymond with a scheme against his girlfriend. Mersault does not consider or analyze what he is doing. He helps Raymond simply because Raymond asks him. “Since I didn’t say anything, he asked if I’d mind doing it right then and I said no,” Meursault says in reference to the letter Raymond asks him to write. (Camus 32) Meursault seems to go along with Raymond’s plan because he sees no reason not to. As to the killing of the Arab, Meursault seems to do it only because he cannot stand the heat and the sun. He does not anticipate the repercussions of his actions; the sun blinds him so he fires the gun. Afterwards, he continues to repeat that it’s all the same, that to shoot or not to shoot makes no difference. Through these two instances Camus seems to show the capacity of humans to act irrationally, without thought.
Alongside
Investigation Meursault And Meursaults Statement. (October 10, 2021). Retrieved from https://www.freeessays.education/investigation-meursault-and-meursaults-statement-essay/