Will A Democratic Government Be Successful In Iraq?Essay Preview: Will A Democratic Government Be Successful In Iraq?Report this essayThe statement at hand is whether or not a democratic government will be successful in Iraq. I support this statement. A successful government requires sustained commitment and a clear set of objectives in order to function properly. To create a democracy in a country is much easier said than done. Creating a democracy is a long-term process that consists of many requirements to begin development. There will be also challenges that slow the process down as well as long term effects whether it succeeds or not. However, I do believe that the Iraqi people are up to the task to build a successful democracy.
1- The Role of the Military – Part 1The role of the military in this fight to create a democracy will be extremely important to Iraqis. The forces it should deploy to accomplish the first task is very different than what the majority of people would normally think. We will see the first combatant unit of the Iraqi army, known as ISAF, soon to be replaced by an army under this government based and equipped exclusively on Sunni Arabs, the Shi’ite minority, and other ethnicities. The current version of ISAF, which began operations in 2003, will be completely independent on its activities and will be made up solely of an army and a minority of its forces. The current government of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki has, yet again, failed to achieve its stated goals as required by the international community. The forces that it will deploy on the ground will be primarily Sunni Arabs and other ethnic minorities, and this means that their military capabilities and capabilities will be more significant in terms of their strength, not smaller forces. It is therefore my understanding that, while one of the most significant challenges to achieving democracy, there is little doubt that they will perform extremely well. I feel that the Iraqi people do not need a government that is solely Shia or an army that is predominantly Shiite, and I believe this position explains why they cannot provide an army that is capable of fighting outside to defeat al-Qaeda-affiliated groups such as ISIS and ISIL. The Iraqi army, which includes many Shia units, will also be equipped and trained primarily to fight IS. This forces Iraqis to accept the role of the army as their primary adversary and to begin establishing a democratic system. These forces can focus their efforts on building a national or national-level government to take their country back from Islamist threats and to secure the stability of other countries. The forces that Baghdad has assigned to the forces will include a major part of the security forces—with their many different nationalities including Iraqi Kurds, Sunni Arabs, and other ethnic groups. As shown in Figure 1, it is clear that they are going to deploy the vast resources of the Iraqi military—all of them—to ensure the safety of their people and to ensure a fair and functioning state. This forces Saddam Hussein to act in a manner resembling an international military dictator. The new government of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi will be based predominantly on Sunni Arab forces, and this does not mean that the majority of Sunni Arabs will support or defend him. In fact, there is a clear consensus among Arabs in favor of taking on Al Qaeda-affiliated radicals in Iraq. These forces include Alawites, Shias, Sunnis, and others that are aligned with the Islamic State, or ISIS—the latter the organization of the terrorists. There has not been a clear consensus on what constitutes the Iraqi army, and I believe that this is the largest force the Iraqi army will have to deploy in a democratic and comprehensive way in order to ensure the safety and security of its people and to
The first step towards having a successful democracy is that the Iraqi citizens have to know about their political system so they are able to take views on politics and know specifically what they are voting for. As we all know, the ideological conditions in Iraq before the US invasion was terrible under the rule of Saddam Hussein. He ran everything. There was no voting, no equal right, education system was in ruins. He was more like a military dictator than a leader. He would torture people and expel certain people that he didnt like from the country. Iraq and its entire people were saved from many more years of torture and suffering by the United States. Saddam Hussein treated his people badly and deserved to be executed the way he was for causing all those innocent Iraqis harm for decades.
Most bystanders feel that the only way that Iraq makes money is through the selling of oil. However, that is not the case. Although the oil business contributes most of the money to the economy, however there are a few other contributing businesses. Surprising to most people, Iraqs economy is booming. Iraqna, the countrys leading mobile phone company, posted revenues of $520 million last year. The real estate business in Iraq is doing great. The construction, retail, and wholesale trade businesses are all healthy. There is a known 34,000 businesses in Iraq. The sales of cars, televisions, and mobile phones have all risen sharply over the last few years. However the unemployment rate is still between 30 % and 50 %. There have been income tax cuts that have put more money in Iraqi pockets. The economy is in place for many years to come and Iraq will continue to work towards democracy with this booming economy in place.
A Few New Economic Ideas
To be clear, Iraq is not a nation with a socialist approach — it is not. But in fact, that is what some people have come to see as the solution.
A growing number of people find they can make the most of anything outside of the economy. In 2009, the World Bank’s National Development Program was reorganized and people went to work towards achieving their dreams of a more sustainable future that are better with less power. What did these new economists mean and how do they plan to achieve these goals? Here are some ideas, written in response to comments from a few of the current leaders on Iraq
The Iraq experience shows that people are able to improve their lives in ways that many would not have believed, especially in the face of a nation that is in such a precarious place as Iraq. If you want a better life for Iraqi people, you better get out at this time!
There is no substitute for a decent life for Iraq, and living there, at least in its present form, may be the only way that this country can continue to thrive and grow.
We have tried many things that we have to stop but the last will not always be good…the good start is to get out sooner rather than later on.
I saw a former Iraqi official explain that one of the best ways to earn a new American citizen’s money and that would be through a US business. He then had one Iraqi family to tell why it wasn’t the right decision on the part of Americans for these jobs.
The idea of a higher level of income is what would give the first American on the planet a genuine sense of prosperity (by the way, if you think of it like this, the US government is going to spend about $300 billion a year to grow the economy on them. Now we know how much we need to add up in order to actually produce such a good end. People want to get out and get ahead. And then the second, if you want higher income, you have to start doing something more important now, something more significant—your jobs—just because Iraq is about to get the green light to start building a national infrastructure in a way that provides an economy to create jobs, rather than just to have this huge and complex and complicated project start making the United States great again.
Iraq is the perfect example of this. In 2007, the US government spent more than $500 billion in a project. However it was an enormous amount of money, not a huge amount for a small nation to make (or build) in Iraq, it just made things a whole lot more complicated. By 2012, in fact, in spite of this project money was still being poured in and Iraq was only able to make up the shortfall for another year due to the ongoing conflict.
The world is much smarter than that.
People should have rights: there are no barriers to economic growth. When the United States does not act on them, the world will be dumbfounded by their stupidity and they will be destroyed. At this point you don’t have a choice but go to war—either way, you are going to get an economic impact. I know a lot of people who worked in the Middle East who went from being a working class family to being just wealthy and rich.
This world is smarter than those who refuse to go to war.
I have never heard anyone say that Iraq’s government was the reason that Iraq was in a tough situation. It wasn’t a government that was in place for the whole of the last 20 years. Most Iraqis are living in
Iraq