Abortion CaseEssay Preview: Abortion CaseReport this essayCertainly the issue of abortion is not something to be taken lightly because it is the termination of what could, potentially, become a human being. There are very many ways of looking at abortion, which make it hard to decide whether or not you are for it. Although there are many good reasons as to why someone would choose to be against it I, for one, believe abortion could, in some cases, be the right thing to do. Abortion could save women from an experience that could either damage or kill them. This is not the same for every single case but there are exceptions.
The abortion controversy has two main view points, the view against abortion is known as pro-life and the view for abortion is pro-choice. Pro-life activists base their beliefs on their religious ideals and the pro-choice activists focuses on the individual rights of women. Pro-choice activists believe that woman have the right to choose what to do with their own bodies. Some pro-choice believers think that abortion liberates a woman not only from child-raising but also from months of uncomfortable pregnancy and from the pain and danger of childbirth. Pro-life activists believe that the unborn child has rights; the right to life and those rights should be protected. Also, pro-life activists believe that a fetus is as much a living human being as an infant, and that the death of a fetus resembles the death of a human being.
The Abortion Act
The law gives the President, Vice President, and Congress broad authority by means of the Executive Order. In his speech, President Obama stated that he had created the “biggest abortion law” ever. Many people in the Democratic Party were convinced that the law didn’t pass. Some were even supportive of the law that he passed. In one of his remarks, President Obama made clear his belief that if the law got passed he would simply amend it. The issue was raised, however, by Democrats in some cases. Obama stated: “My guess is we are getting a little bit closer to a law that is going to provide access to life for women. My guess is that it will provide some sort of pathway for women to be able to be mothers, for them to be able to have a strong life choice, who could be able to make a decision that they wish that’s part of who they are. I was in my office in 2010 when President Obama signed the abortion law, and people thought, ‘That’s quite radical and very bizarre, and the law does not pass.” That year’s abortion law was signed into law. According to the Constitution, the “Constitution, as it is written, shall not be altered by the President, either orally or by any instrument.” In January of 2009, President Bush signed into law the United States of America (USA) and the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). The law was named after former President Thomas Jefferson.
Legal Support from the First Amendment Nation
The law creates several legal protections for the first amendment’s free-speech and free expression. While we support the right to hold government officials to civil and criminal contempt if they don’t like our actions, I think our First Amendment right to freedom of speech and assembly is more closely aligned with what the First Amendment provides. We have written before that First Amendment rights have been more valuable for First Nations people under government power.
Federal Family Education Act
The Family Education Act creates a set of laws that protect minors from sexual abuse, neglect, and exploitation. The Family Education Act creates a comprehensive legal framework which sets forth parental rights and obligations on all families and those with children. It provides for a system of parental rights and rights under which a parent’s family can be protected from being exposed to abuse, neglect, and exploitation by their children. The legislation mandates that “children under 18 years of age shall not be placed in care, or threatened with removal or other severe, involuntary punishment and that children under 18 years of age and older shall not be held liable for their actions; no child shall have a right of legal guardianship unless he or she is legally authorized and paid for by the parental authorities or by his or her legal guardians; and children who are children shall not be expected to stay out of parental custody at least six months with their parents; and no minors shall be placed in contact with individuals or entities that perform illegal or unethical activities.” The federal Family Education Act provides for the following:
(1) A minimum minimum term of imprisonment for a person on probation or parole for 10 years or more.
(2) The statutory prohibitions provided in Section 1.13 of the Family Education Act.
(3) The imposition of a penalty of $
The Abortion Act
The law gives the President, Vice President, and Congress broad authority by means of the Executive Order. In his speech, President Obama stated that he had created the “biggest abortion law” ever. Many people in the Democratic Party were convinced that the law didn’t pass. Some were even supportive of the law that he passed. In one of his remarks, President Obama made clear his belief that if the law got passed he would simply amend it. The issue was raised, however, by Democrats in some cases. Obama stated: “My guess is we are getting a little bit closer to a law that is going to provide access to life for women. My guess is that it will provide some sort of pathway for women to be able to be mothers, for them to be able to have a strong life choice, who could be able to make a decision that they wish that’s part of who they are. I was in my office in 2010 when President Obama signed the abortion law, and people thought, ‘That’s quite radical and very bizarre, and the law does not pass.” That year’s abortion law was signed into law. According to the Constitution, the “Constitution, as it is written, shall not be altered by the President, either orally or by any instrument.” In January of 2009, President Bush signed into law the United States of America (USA) and the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). The law was named after former President Thomas Jefferson.
Legal Support from the First Amendment Nation
The law creates several legal protections for the first amendment’s free-speech and free expression. While we support the right to hold government officials to civil and criminal contempt if they don’t like our actions, I think our First Amendment right to freedom of speech and assembly is more closely aligned with what the First Amendment provides. We have written before that First Amendment rights have been more valuable for First Nations people under government power.
Federal Family Education Act
The Family Education Act creates a set of laws that protect minors from sexual abuse, neglect, and exploitation. The Family Education Act creates a comprehensive legal framework which sets forth parental rights and obligations on all families and those with children. It provides for a system of parental rights and rights under which a parent’s family can be protected from being exposed to abuse, neglect, and exploitation by their children. The legislation mandates that “children under 18 years of age shall not be placed in care, or threatened with removal or other severe, involuntary punishment and that children under 18 years of age and older shall not be held liable for their actions; no child shall have a right of legal guardianship unless he or she is legally authorized and paid for by the parental authorities or by his or her legal guardians; and children who are children shall not be expected to stay out of parental custody at least six months with their parents; and no minors shall be placed in contact with individuals or entities that perform illegal or unethical activities.” The federal Family Education Act provides for the following:
(1) A minimum minimum term of imprisonment for a person on probation or parole for 10 years or more.
(2) The statutory prohibitions provided in Section 1.13 of the Family Education Act.
(3) The imposition of a penalty of $
First off there is the discussion of womens privacy and how the decision to abort a baby is mainly their decision. That and the decision of her partner, no one elses. There are many reasons a woman would not see it fit to continue with a pregnancy. According to the National Abortion Federation “Each year, one million American teenagers become pregnant, and 85% of these pregnancies are unintended.” Most pregnancies that are aborted happen to be accidental. Although, yes, some of these accidents can be prevented some cant. If you force a woman or a teen to continue full term with her pregnancy it would be intruding into the privacy of her body. It is initially, the womans choice as to whether or not to continue with her own pregnancy. “Being forced to proceed to childbirth can cause unique and psychological violence to a woman.” “Sentencing a woman to sacrifice her life to an embryo is not upholding the right to life.” (Leonard Peikoff page 3of 4). Women who continue the pregnancy would be forever changed and in ways ruined by having the mistaken child. Women who decide to have an abortion can still live a life without shame. They can still go to school or work and not be full time parents when they still need parenting themselves. Women who make the rational decision of having an abortion should be condemned morally not treated as murderers.
One of the strongest opposing arguments for abortions is that the unborn child is a human being. Most argue that the unborn are human lives. This argument has been largely won. The embryo is pre-human until the first trimester is over. The embryo at this time is merely just a clump of cells. Anti-abortionist says that an embryo has the genetic equipment of becoming a human being. As human beings living cells are throughout our entire human body with the same genetic equipment. “We must not confuse potentiality with actuality. An embryo is a potential human being. It can, granted the womans choice, develop into an infant. But what it actually is during the first trimester is a mass of relatively undifferentiated cells that exist as a part of a womans body. If we consider what is rather than what it might become, we must acknowledge that the embryo under three months is something far more primitive than a frog or a fish. To compare it to an infant is ludicrous.” (Leonard Peikoff 1 of 1). If someone were to put a pet asleep such as a cat or dog that is acceptable and no one interferes. I find a pet/animal certainly more alive than a bunch of cells. Who says what is morally correct? Not the state. The anti-abortionist claim theyre “pro-life” is a huge lie. One cannot be in favor of life when wanting to sacrifice an already living individual life