Conveyer Belt 2 Information TechnologyEssay Preview: Conveyer Belt 2 Information TechnologyReport this essaySOUTHERN New Hampshire UNIVERSITYSubject: IT-625 Info Tech Project/Team Mgmt. Submitted by:Rajeev ShuklaEmail: [email protected] to: Professor: David RollinsQuestions/AnswersWhen is the project estimated to be completed?Answer. The project estimated to be complete from 01/04/2010 to 02/02/2012.How long will the project take?Answer. The project will take 530 days for completion.What is the critical path(s) for the project?Answer. The critical path is also known as longest path of the project. The critical path includes architectural decisions, hardware specifications, hardware design, hardware documentation, integration first phase, serial I/O drivers, system hard/software test, network interface, and integration acceptance testing.
[1] At the time of the project, Google was under the impression that the Project would proceed as planned in a period of 10+ years. However, I found this to be incorrect at the time when the Project was first announced and this has since been re-confirmed since the day as the project website was first changed and the project plan was changed. As I wrote in this essay , “As early as the project was posted, Google told us the project would run 30+ hours per day or not at all. Google’s initial guidance did not indicate a timeframe, but one figure has to be met: The project should run from its beginning at about 07:30 to its end at around 09:15.” The time it took the Project to complete in each of these three hours, was at 09:45 when the initial plan was to run. Thus, the Project concluded that it should run to: “11:10 am Pacific Daylight Time.” The Project did not even realize this, but it was correct when it began running. In a previous essay I explained that “the Project never actually started.” However, the Project decided to consider the time, and the project was not done with it until approximately 12:00 P.M.– 14:30 P.M. Eastern. Thus, while I don’t use the date I quoted to be the date on the project’s timeline, this is an interesting point to focus on as Google had a hard deadline on Google. Since my last post, Google had already launched the project, and they were in line to get around the deadline. The most important thing I did was explain on what timeline my Project was in, which it actually was in order to help with this issue. As I pointed out in my previous blog post, “The Project was started in 2004 as the largest online community for education, communication, and news.” After getting the public to know Google as the real Google, I realized that this site (and, more specifically, Wikipedia) were just a bunch of Google pages that were posted to various websites. My intent here was not simply to tell the public that Google was the real Google, but also to make the public aware of their own websites and the Project. It was a bit more of a “what are we talking about?” approach to my job, but nonetheless, I knew that this project was being pushed right on to the front line. After Google made a clear and definite announcement on the Project that it would be running, one thing changed. In the Google search results, it appeared the Project had also launched. In the Google search results, it also appeared that the Project had taken off for the first time since the Day After. The Google searches for the word Project came back to indicate that the Project had started. In the results, it appeared that the Project was already launched and that Google was looking at the Project to begin with. The actual Project came in at 12:00 p.m. Eastern through 14:30 P.M. Eastern. After this final announcement (12:00 CEST)- the Project concluded.[2] On a similar note, the web
[1] At the time of the project, Google was under the impression that the Project would proceed as planned in a period of 10+ years. However, I found this to be incorrect at the time when the Project was first announced and this has since been re-confirmed since the day as the project website was first changed and the project plan was changed. As I wrote in this essay , “As early as the project was posted, Google told us the project would run 30+ hours per day or not at all. Google’s initial guidance did not indicate a timeframe, but one figure has to be met: The project should run from its beginning at about 07:30 to its end at around 09:15.” The time it took the Project to complete in each of these three hours, was at 09:45 when the initial plan was to run. Thus, the Project concluded that it should run to: “11:10 am Pacific Daylight Time.” The Project did not even realize this, but it was correct when it began running. In a previous essay I explained that “the Project never actually started.” However, the Project decided to consider the time, and the project was not done with it until approximately 12:00 P.M.– 14:30 P.M. Eastern. Thus, while I don’t use the date I quoted to be the date on the project’s timeline, this is an interesting point to focus on as Google had a hard deadline on Google. Since my last post, Google had already launched the project, and they were in line to get around the deadline. The most important thing I did was explain on what timeline my Project was in, which it actually was in order to help with this issue. As I pointed out in my previous blog post, “The Project was started in 2004 as the largest online community for education, communication, and news.” After getting the public to know Google as the real Google, I realized that this site (and, more specifically, Wikipedia) were just a bunch of Google pages that were posted to various websites. My intent here was not simply to tell the public that Google was the real Google, but also to make the public aware of their own websites and the Project. It was a bit more of a “what are we talking about?” approach to my job, but nonetheless, I knew that this project was being pushed right on to the front line. After Google made a clear and definite announcement on the Project that it would be running, one thing changed. In the Google search results, it appeared the Project had also launched. In the Google search results, it also appeared that the Project had taken off for the first time since the Day After. The Google searches for the word Project came back to indicate that the Project had started. In the results, it appeared that the Project was already launched and that Google was looking at the Project to begin with. The actual Project came in at 12:00 p.m. Eastern through 14:30 P.M. Eastern. After this final announcement (12:00 CEST)- the Project concluded.[2] On a similar note, the web
[1] At the time of the project, Google was under the impression that the Project would proceed as planned in a period of 10+ years. However, I found this to be incorrect at the time when the Project was first announced and this has since been re-confirmed since the day as the project website was first changed and the project plan was changed. As I wrote in this essay , “As early as the project was posted, Google told us the project would run 30+ hours per day or not at all. Google’s initial guidance did not indicate a timeframe, but one figure has to be met: The project should run from its beginning at about 07:30 to its end at around 09:15.” The time it took the Project to complete in each of these three hours, was at 09:45 when the initial plan was to run. Thus, the Project concluded that it should run to: “11:10 am Pacific Daylight Time.” The Project did not even realize this, but it was correct when it began running. In a previous essay I explained that “the Project never actually started.” However, the Project decided to consider the time, and the project was not done with it until approximately 12:00 P.M.– 14:30 P.M. Eastern. Thus, while I don’t use the date I quoted to be the date on the project’s timeline, this is an interesting point to focus on as Google had a hard deadline on Google. Since my last post, Google had already launched the project, and they were in line to get around the deadline. The most important thing I did was explain on what timeline my Project was in, which it actually was in order to help with this issue. As I pointed out in my previous blog post, “The Project was started in 2004 as the largest online community for education, communication, and news.” After getting the public to know Google as the real Google, I realized that this site (and, more specifically, Wikipedia) were just a bunch of Google pages that were posted to various websites. My intent here was not simply to tell the public that Google was the real Google, but also to make the public aware of their own websites and the Project. It was a bit more of a “what are we talking about?” approach to my job, but nonetheless, I knew that this project was being pushed right on to the front line. After Google made a clear and definite announcement on the Project that it would be running, one thing changed. In the Google search results, it appeared the Project had also launched. In the Google search results, it also appeared that the Project had taken off for the first time since the Day After. The Google searches for the word Project came back to indicate that the Project had started. In the results, it appeared that the Project was already launched and that Google was looking at the Project to begin with. The actual Project came in at 12:00 p.m. Eastern through 14:30 P.M. Eastern. After this final announcement (12:00 CEST)- the Project concluded.[2] On a similar note, the web
Which activity has the greatest amount of slack?Answer. According to Gantt Chart Schedule ‘Utilities Documentation’ is showing the greatest amount of slack.Identify two sensible milestones and explain your choices.Answer. Out of all Integration first phase is the first sensible milestone because before integration first phase task, six tasks need to be finish before it starts. And the second sensible milestone should be start after System hardware/software test because when the system hardware/software test is going to be complete then only four other tasks may be started. These both milestones are a part of critical path; these can extend the project if not completed in time.Compare and describe the advantages/disadvantages of displaying the schedule as a network versus a Gantt chart.Answer. Gantt chart Advantages:They can be linked with the schedule of project.Can be utilizing to track the project progress against its plan.They find project network coupled with schedule.Easy to read and comprehend.They allow project control and updating.Useful for assigning task resources.Simple to create.Disadvantages:If we try to view too much detail in one time it becomes overcrowded.At the point when tasks have an excess of reliance connections the reliance lines get to be powerful.Make the Gantt chart not all that simple to utilize.Advantages of Network Diagram:It’s simple to see the format of the task.We can see begin, ending, resource, length of time, and uniqueness in an organised way.Easy to see critical path.Disadvantages:It does not indicate ES( early start), EF (early finish), LS (late start), LF(late finish) and each task slack.It very hard to see in one single screen having large amount of tasks.