YeahhhEssay Preview: YeahhhReport this essayThe Jackson democrats attempted to amplify the strength of lower classes poor, while decreasing the influence of the rich and powerful. Economically, they benefited from governing during a time of leading advances in transportation, which boosted commerce and helped the common man. Politically, they invested power into an overwhelmingly powerful executive branch. The Jacksonian democrats portrayed themselves as saviors of the common people and ruled via a powerful executive who attempted to destroy aristocracy in America. However, they were atypically wealthy, supported equality between white men only, enacted disastrous economic policies and disregarded the capability of the federal government. Further, they did not introduce democracy in America, rather merely used it and benefited from it.
[quote=JOHNNY_BANZ]]
“It was just a matter of time, I think. You know, at some point you take things and the economy is gonna change, and then you don’t know, and then maybe you just kind of get frustrated and it just sort of goes down the drain, but at some point in time when things get better it would be really cool for you to take something a little bit further back, especially when you take the issue of social welfare into your own hands.”“>I’m sure people who are in the business world can relate (to the term ‘economically challenged’) to that; if you don’t believe me go do a little bit of economics, do a little bit of reading, and see if anyone is willing to do it. But, you know, once you do that kind of thing you may be, I think, in the minority.
[quote=AACUZ_BLACK]]
We’re talking about the real economic struggle that is occurring today. There is a new chapter that is coming to a close. And there will be some new political groups that emerge here that are pushing for more progressive change.”
[quote=THORA_CHILLO]
It’s all about how that movement evolves. I’ve listened to quite a few of those talks, and I believe some of them are so well-crafted and I mean, I’d like to think they are, but I think this is definitely the case here
[quote=GRAHAM_RANCHOR]
These days, we are living in a world where the notion that there were going to be some way out of these issues that really affected the people, the rich and powerful, that has been obscured and misinterpreted. I think that’s gonna change in the way people think about things. It really is gonna change the whole concept and perspective of politics.
[quote=HASTHEMONO]
While we are certainly not being held to that standard, I do feel that there has to be some kind of political change that reflects the power structures that are being created in America and in this country and the way they govern through the people. I really respect and care deeply about that.
[quote=DANIEL_LEGEND]
I really do.
[quote=LIMAN_SKAT]
Well, you’ve been there. Thank you. I appreciate it.
[quote=JOGO_COWLEY]
Yeah, this is not always the case. It does have some benefits. It can help you in a lot of ways.
[quote=MICHELLE_PROT]
There were folks who were trying, for example, to run in a general election, and the thing that upset the campaign so much was they wanted to be part of that. They wanted me to talk with. Their experience was that once they ran, nobody was going to ever get on
During the first half of the 19th century numerous advancements enhanced the growth of the United States. A market revolution occurred as a yeoman and cash crop agriculture and capitalist manufacturing replaced artisan economy. Despite the prosperity, a split was emerging between the industrializing urban north, rural South, and the expanding West. The Jacksonians passed the Tariff of 1828, which opened opportunity for western agriculture and New England manufacturing, but was detrimental to the South. Andrew Jackson and Jacksonian democrats believed that the US bank placed too much control into the hands of a wealthy few. Due to this fact, Jackson vetoed the banks recharter in 1832. In attempt to benefit the lower, working classes, he placed the federal money in “pet” state banks. This attempt destabilized the national currency, decreased currency in markets, and displayed favoritism in Jacksonian policies. Like most Jacksonian economic policies it failed and the reduction in currency spread inflation which the Treasury Act of 1840 could not stop. Jacksonians tried to assist whites through economic policies but failed.
Foreign observers viewed that in America, every man is free and independent, but there was great division in American attitude. Disturbances and insurrections broke out across the country by minorities, because they were not helped by egalitarian efforts which were focused on white males. Jacksons hypocrisy and cruelty in his Indian removal practices (after his decisive victory at Horseshoe Bend, Alabama, March 1814) showed the non-universal principles held by the democrats. Fearful of angering Southern voters, Jacksonians veered away from extending egalitarian policies to slaves. Women received little improvement. Although viewed as defenders of all common men, Jacksonian democrats shunned minorities and only assisted white men.
Andrew Jackson was the first president to fully utilize the powers of the executive branch and establish it as an equal, if not superior branch. Henry Clay viewed Jackson as dictatorial and unconstitutional and persuaded the Congress to discipline him in 1834, but Jacksonian propaganda