Jane Eyre, One Of The Greatest Love Stories Of All Time?Essay Preview: Jane Eyre, One Of The Greatest Love Stories Of All Time?Report this essay“Jane Eyre” is a novel of passion, desire, rage and defiance, combining to form a literary sensation that has withstood the test of time. The novel’s sense of mystery, betrayal and deceit create the perfect romance narrative which has been evoking passion from its readers for over a century. Jane’s enduring quest for love, love of a family and of an equal fulfill the human ideals of romance as she defies all obstacles in her way. The love between Rochester and Jane dissolves the constraints of Victorian society where social status becomes of little significance. “Jane Eyre” epitomizes triumph over impossible odds as two people of different status can love each other for who they are and nothing more.
A major theme of “Jane Eyre” is Jane’s quest for love, which is made plain very early on in the novel. Before the novel has even begun, Jane has lost the love of her parents and her Uncle through their deaths. Jane seeks and finds certain degrees of maternal love in characters from each volume of her life, such as Bessie at Gateshead, Miss Temple at Lowood and Mrs. Fairfax at Thornfield Hall. However, these characters are promptly taken away from her. Jane finds not only a romantic love with Mr. Rochester, he is also a Byronic father-figure to her, Jane’s love for Rochester stems from the fact that he is the first to offer her a lasting love and a home, вЂ?I ask you to pass through life at my side- to be my second self, and best earthly companion,’ they are also вЂ?kindred spirits’ and although Rochester is Jane’s social and economic superior, they are spiritually and intellectually equal, however after chapter 11, volume 2, Jane becomes Rochester’s moral superior.
Jane searches not just for romantic love, but also for a sense of belonging and being valued. �To gain some real affection from you or Miss Temple… I would willingly submit to have the bone of my broken or to let a bull toss me.’ Although this is very melodramatic and derived from childish notions, it shows Jane’s desperate need throughout her life to love, and to be loved. Jane finds a passionate and companionable love with Mr. Rochester towards the denouement as equality has been achieved; Jane becomes an emotionally and economically independent woman. �No, sir; I am an independent woman now.’ With her time at Moor House, Jane matures and learns that she must love without sacrificing and harming herself, whilst Rochester learns to respect Jane and see her as an individual. This respect of Jane is what makes his dependence on her at the end of the novel more bearable to him, and makes Jane love him even more. �One is in danger of loving you too well for all this; and making too much of you.’ Mr. Rochester’s dependency on Jane is foreshadowed at their first meeting in chapter 11 when he is forced to lean on Jane to get to his horse. �He laid a heavy hand on my shoulder, and leaning on me with some stress, limped to his horse.’
Jane finds freedom through her marriage to Mr. Rochester but would have enslaved herself through loss of dignity if she had agreed to his proposal of becoming a mistress. Mr. Rochester and Jane overcome many obstacles and their relationship is symbolized by the chestnut tree at Thornfield Orchard, the tree is split in half and damaged, yet it still remains. вЂ?The great horse-chestnut at the bottom of the orchard had been struck by lightening in the night, and half of it split away.’ The tree at this point symbolizes the disastrous wedding to come and yet Jane and Mr. Rochester’s relationship survives. What appeals to readers about this romance is that there is betrayal and deceit in Jane and Edward’s relationship, which applies to couples of all generations; however Jane is still able to forgive Rochester. This degree of betrayal, often leads to the end of relationships however, in “Jane Eyre” it actually leads to the forming of a perfect relationship and marriage. вЂ?I am my husband’s life as fully as he is mine…We are precisely suited in character- perfect concord is the result.’
There are two dilemmas of marriage for Jane; Rochester and St John Rivers. Something that also appeals to many readers is that Jane does not settle with a loveless marriage. Although Mr. Rochester betrays Jane, she has faith in their love. Where Mr. Rochester tempts Jane to reject all social convention and duty, St John wants her to abandon passion. Both characters act as a foil to one another and represent the two halves of Jane’s personality and Jane shows here that she struggles with her identity against both men, �I was almost as hard beset by him as I had been once before, in a different way, by another,’ Rochester and Jane are often represented as fire, �flaming and flashing’ and St John is represented as ice, �By degrees, he acquired a certain influence over me that took away my liberty of mind. . . I fell under a freezing spell,’ ultimately Jane chooses to be her true self but has learnt to balance this with self-control, also highlighted by Donald D. Stone, �the efforts of the Bronte protagonists to find a middle position between passionate rebellion and rigid self-control.’
The love between Jane and Mr. Rochester is extremely passionate and the chemistry between them brings both characters to life. There is a lot of camaraderie between the two characters which is often humorous and allows the reader to gain an intimate knowledge of Jane and Rochester’s relationship and to also feel more involved with both characters. �Am I hideous, Jane?’ �Very, sir: You always were, you know.’
The writer Anthony Trollope described “Jane Eyre” as a novel that would last because, вЂ?the men and women depicted are human in their aspirations, human in their sympathies, and human in their actions.’ Rochester and Jane are very real characters, they are restricted by social convention and yet they fall in love. Neither character fits the stereotypical beautiful and handsome images of the hero or the heroine in a romance novel, in fact Rochester is described as ugly and Jane as plain, вЂ?You are not pretty, anymore than I am handsome,’ however all superficial and material notions become irrelevant to both characters as they are equals in passion, spirit and intellect. Their relationship is also foreshadowed before the
I can only conclude on the surface that the hero/woman-turned-woman-turned-woman seems to suffer from her mental and physical frailty, and that her desire is to live with the love and companionship the heroine of Rochester and her friends might require. But that the love between Rochester and his wife and his closest friends, or even the love between his mother and father, or even the love between himself and his sister, and that this love is even possible at a certain age (when a lover could not wait to give up his dreams or to leave home), are important, doesn’t really matter because we are not in the story of Jane Eyre. We have to wait for her to come out with her true love – but only for a month or a half, but we never have to fight for a return to Rochester. Or just to love and get a job. Or wait for a job without any money or other help!
But I think there really is something that needs to be said here about a character’s love for those who love him, and a character’s love for his friends: there are no good reasons why we can expect love for those we want, without those we want.
In other words we can think of people with love interests only as people who want to live a wonderful, wonderful life, without those they want. We can think of people, at least with the right person (or someone, it’s up to us, so maybe we can say!), who simply do not have love for their friends, despite having had great success.
For all the arguments to the contrary, this is because the people we want are so few – we want enough people to have a good life, which is what everyone wants.
So the story of Rochester and Jane Eyre is about a young man who has only one loved one: He does not want to be born with his own son but rather to be a man born with his own son. The plot in this novel is not a plot of love itself, but this is how we look at love. What is true love in Rochester is true love and love goes back to the love of two men.
It’s called love, and it goes back to a simple idea, which is that if a person wants to be a person, just don’t say no to some people. If somebody really wants and wants to be a person and needs to be there for you, then don’t say no to the person if you can just say no to the person, because even if you can never get to know the person, you might be able to get through the loneliness of the loneliness. At best a person only wants to belong to one person for a while, then to return home. In