Empiricist Vs. Rationalist
Join now to read essay Empiricist Vs. Rationalist
Empiricist philosophers such as John Locke believe that knowledge must come from experience. Others philosophers such as Descartes believe that knowledge is innate; this way of thinking is used by rationalist. In this paper I will discuss the difference between Descartes rationalism in his essays “The Meditations” and Lockes empiricism in his essays “An Essay Concerning Human Understanding”. I will then lend my understanding as to what I believe as the ultimate source of knowledge.
Locke discards the suggestion of innate ideas. Locke believes that if we always had innate ideas, it would be impossible for us not to perceive or be aware of them. He believes that if there were innate ideas then they would be universal ideas present in everyone (universal ideas are the principals that all humans agree on). He uses the case of children to prove that not all ideas are universal and innate by stating that if they were then everybody would have them when they were born, and it is obvious that children do not have universal ideas “children cannot be ignorant of them: infants, and all that have souls, must necessarily have them in their understandings” (Locke 92).
Like all empiricists, Locke believes that knowledge comes from experience. He believes the mind to be a blank canvas and that ideas get into our minds through sensations, perceptions and reflections. “Let us then suppose the mind to be, as we say, white paper, void of all characters, without any ideas” (Locke 96). Locke believes that reflection (when we perceive our own mind) and sensation (sense perception) are the only two ways that ideas can come into our minds. This is where experience comes into the picture; Locke believes that everybody gains ideas through sensation experiences. Sounds, colours, and touchable qualities come into the mind through our senses. In order to have an idea of something (such as the colour red); you must first have an experience of it. Lockes explanation for the different levels/degrees of knowledge is that people have different types and kinds of experiences. Some people might have more intense or even just more of an experience; also some experiences might affect people greatly or very little.
Descartes as a rationalist believes that knowledge comes from the mind alone. During the First Meditation, Descartes came to the conclusion that there must be some kind of evil deceiver that “leads him to a state of doubt” (Descartes 77). Descartes starts out with the fact that distant sensations are subject to doubt and uncertainty. He then goes on to try and cast doubt onto close sensations. Descartes starts off by stating that close sense perception must be certain because we are not crazy, and only a insane person would doubt what was right in front of them. Descartes then uses the dream argument to cast uncertainty on close sense perception because “they are as lively, vivid and clear as reality is when we are awake” (Descartes 76). Descartes then states that geometry and math are certain. “For whether I am awake or sleeping, two and three added together always make five, and a square never has more than four sides; and it does not seem possible that truths so apparent can be suspected of any falsity