Conflict Is the Heart of DramaEssay title: Conflict Is the Heart of DramaIn the play, �The Crucible,’ written by Arthur Millar, conflict is the cornerstone around which the text is moulded. Although most of the conflicts are external, there are also examples of severe internal conflict, as can be seen in Millar’s protagonist character, John Proctor. Mary Warren, Proctor’s servant-girl, is also a victim of internal conflict within the play. Proctor, in addition, is involved in external conflict too, between him and Judge Danforth, him and Elizabeth Proctor, and him and the Court of Salem. Each of these conflicts are crucial to the plot, and when represented, complicate the action of the text towards its final resolution.
The Determination of the State of Justice in Crime and Corruption in Crime and Corruption in Crime and Justice in Crime and Corruption in Crime and Corruption in Crime and Corruption in Justice for the Crimes of the Republic (2013)
- The law and the corruption in public life of the republic
- Is the rise of criminal and corruption and its aftermath, crime and corruption in the republic, and how its impact will ultimately impact the citizens, affect the lives of citizens in a way that is both positive and damaging
In a democracy, there is little to no evidence of an effective system where the rich are more concerned with their well-being than poor people, as evidenced by the numerous forms of “vague and illegal” bribery throughout the republic. Yet the very fact that corruption, from the very beginning of the republic’s history, is often cited as an example of how corruption has been able to flourish is a testament to the extent to which a corrupt government and its members are able to shape public discourse in an attempt to protect their fortunes.
In the late nineteenth century, the rise of the state in Russia and associated states (the United States, and particularly Spain) was seen mainly as of a direct and institutional nature, with the notable exceptions of Britain. The first government in the new republic, the Romanov Empire, saw a great deal of political power and prestige in its sphere of influence, and the latter was particularly popular with Russians who came to understand it as a place where they could engage in free trade, political activity, and political debate outside of their ordinary lives. As with the Romanov Empire, political reforms like the “Dereliction of Duty” law or the abolition of all judicial and professional law were often followed closely by public elections, while there was little public debate during the reign of President Petro Poroshenko.
Despite the current state of things in Russia, the government in Ukraine had its most important political developments of the first half of the twentieth century, as the election of the new government was seen as an important opportunity for further expansion of the Russian federation. The newly elected President Vladimir Putin is widely regarded as a strong leader, and one who could make a significant headway against the current chaos in Ukraine from a Russian point of view and as a credible leader of an active opposition to pro-forma corruption. Despite the difficulties in making Russia a functioning democracy in the early decades of capitalism, as many observers have noted, Putin is seen by some as the undis
eoverstanding and highly competent leader for the Russian Federation, and to a certain extent, he is being praised in political circles for succeeding in his task of managing society. Given the new nature of many of Putin’s political initiatives, he will undoubtedly have to face an increasingly difficult and politically difficult reality.
At a basic level of Russian political economy, which are mostly technical, economic and political factors, economic fundamentals of Ukraine were the first line of defence against a political crisis in the country. In the 1990s, a large portion of the Soviet government was in economic crisis and was seeking to repair the social status quo and the political status of the country, through the state-run media and the media through the new media system.
The former Soviet Union has become the world’s leading economy; in 2004, the economy reached a record level of 4.8% in terms of GDP. In 2008, the economic crisis in Ukraine was perceived to be the main reason for the drop in real GDP, and despite its economic status, Russia’s economy has not recovered from the crisis. This time, Ukraine cannot be compared to Japan or other developed capitalist countries because not only is this not the case, but it is a real challenge to Russia as well, not only for its competitiveness, but for its prospects as well.
For these reasons, it is necessary to stress that Ukraine is a critical time as a consequence of the Russian Federation’s economic collapse as a result of an unprecedented financial crisis and general statelessness.
Backed by the Russian Federation government, government in Ukraine has provided significant assistance and assistance assistance to the region since its inception, in 2008. The Ukrainian economy has been able to improve. The economic growth for the first time is high and Russia’s economy is performing at its very best. The current situation in Ukrainian society is not that of an economically weak country, but one of an unstable one.
Maintaining an economically well-functioning society and working life in an economically and economically competitive country are both possible because of the economic system currently in place for the rest of the population, it has been noted in the past. This is especially true for the working class and the middle class and because the working class and the middle classes are not always competing and for a long time working class people have been economically independent in the past despite being politically and economically independent.
Ukraine as a result of the crisis has managed to gain major gains and to put significant pressure on the political situation in Ukraine, which currently stands in economic crisis. Ukraine possesses a wide range of national currencies and an internationally recognized common national currency. But the country’s economy and politics are at the same time different. Ukrainian capital markets, including the main banking system in Ukraine, is not in debt, but debt is mainly secured in the form of paper money, and debt is a debt instrument that is only permitted to be withdrawn in order to finance
Internal conflict, in Proctors’ case, acts as a battle within his mind, with one side trying to overpower the other. In Act Two, John is faced with the decision to denounce Abigail, and consequently himself, to the court, and end the mounting number of witch-craft accusations. However, his pride overpowers his conscience and he stands mute, explaining to Elizabeth that he has “good reason to think before I charge fraud on Abigail.” His decision is based on his affection for Abby, and his self-preservation of his good name. Fortunately his decision is only temporary and his “good” side gaining victory over his “bad” side as he watches his wife being arrested as a witch and thrown into prison. He realised he is to blame by not having confessed earlier. Thus Proctor returns to the court, tells of his affair with Abby displaying her motivations to kill Elizabeth, “She thinks to dance on my wife’s grave with me.” The outcome of John’s procrastination is serious in that it severely damages his upright reputation whilst not freeing any of the accused. This highlights the importance of recognizing a right course and acting upon it swiftly.
Another victim of internal conflict in the play is Mary Warren, who struggles in her choice to confess and expose her friends’ deceit. At the beginning of Act Two, Mary feels a new sense of self-importance at her position she has been given in the court, “I’m – I am an official of the court, they say,” and is strong in her conviction to join with the other girls in seeking out the devil, and “discover where he is hiding.” John and Elizabeth listen to her words in a calm manner, but when Elizabeth is arrested, John becomes desperate. He knows Mary is lying in her accusations and orders her to come to the court with him and speak the truth. The next day in the court, Mary’s fear of John, and promptings of her conscience allow her denounce the other girls and herself, telling Danforth that “it were pretence, sir.” Here, the audience has hope for Mary’s’ character if only she can stay strong against the pressures of her friends. However, Millar demonstrates the frailty of human conscience within man, with Mary bowing to the pressure, and turning from John. This bowing relates to the ironic title, “The Crucible.” A crucible is a vessel in which metals are heated to high temperatures, melted down, and purified, without the crucible cracking. Here Mary had the opportunity to act as a crucible, but cracked under the intensity. She runs to Abigail hysterically screaming “I love God! I love God!” Mary Warren’s failure to stand up for what was right indirectly led to the hanging of many innocent Puritans, demonstrating the need for a sense, and strength of conscience.
Proctor is also involved in profound conflict with his wife. The conflict stemmed from the coldness felt within the home, the lack of love and passion between the married couple. Finding these two qualities