Puritanism and PragmatismJoin now to read essay Puritanism and PragmatismAlthough they lived on the same continent, John Winthrop and Benjamin Franklin lived in very different worlds. These men are similar in some respects, but overwhelmingly they are different. For example, John Winthrop and Benjamin Franklin can be considered leaders in their time frame. Winthrop led the Puritans; Franklin led his country to war. Both men also possessed many of the same virtues such as patience and work ethic. Despite these similarities, John Winthrop and Benjamin Franklin had a different style of living and a different philosophy of life. These differences are most notable in regards to religion, economics, and science.
They shared some ideas and opinions of the time, but they never had to go on much to learn from each others. These ideas and opinions are reflected in a wide range of works ranging from the Bible to the Bible Prophets to the Greek Mythology, history, religion, history books to a variety of philosophical approaches. It is well worth watching as these ideas and opinions are reflected throughout the writings and history of both men.
It is also interesting to note, that neither William Daley or Joseph Bancroft ever spoke or wrote the same language.
The Book of Mormon is a well written, well documented and very popular religious history, especially in this country. These books are filled with interesting information, facts, and statistics. As much as it does cover a wide variety of subjects, it does not have a uniform set of laws or official statements. The same is true of this book, with numerous references to law, customs, laws of the land, and many other facts that you won’t want to miss.
In the fall of 1856, William Daley, a Mormon, died having written a book on history and Mormonism, the first known Mormon missionary activity to his native land. This book was published in November of 1850. William Daley’s writings, called The Mormon Book of Mormon was a popular publication for Mormons around the country and a staple of all Mormons, even though it was written mainly for Mormon Americans. For those looking for information concerning one of the founding fathers in the world on any form of religion, I highly recommend this list to you. I am not an expert on religion but I think it would be helpful to read the book in its entirety.
The Book of Mormon was a popular Mormon religious history, with a general outline of Mormon history and the early period of its religious history. The most prominent features of the Book of Mormon are:–
1. History of the Old World–
In all of these works, there is a broad overall historical and historiographical information that is presented that is well-known, well researched, and well researched.
2. Religious History–
Both Daley and Bancroft have written their own religious history books and are very good at presenting material as well as historical background to an understanding of their own history. These historical and historical backgrounds will not only stand in stark contrasts to many of their material predecessors, but also have a good deal of depth to them.
3. History of the Church–
Both Daley and Bancroft do a very good job presenting the actual LDS Church history from a personal point of view. It
Perhaps the greatest difference between Winthrop and Franklin was their view of religion. Winthrop, a devout Puritan, governed Massachusetts Bay. Every aspect of life in a Puritan colony revolved around religion. The most important thing in order to establish Winthrop’s “city upon a hill,” “was the need for the people to obey their governors and for the governors to obey God. If they did, God would adopt and protect the wilderness colony as He had the ancient Jews” (Nash & Graves 31). Puritanism reflects the notion of pre-destination, indoctrinated by Calvinism, in which there are only two kinds of people: the elect and the non-elect. The elect were the people, usually ministers and high-ranking officers, who have been chosen by God to go to Heaven. The non-elect then, were the people who were not chosen. Franklin was not a Puritan. He believed that good deeds could earn one’s way into Heaven; thus, he did not accept pre-destination. Franklin’s view of religion was not, “the worship of God or even salvation, but humankind’s well-being on earth” (57). Certainly, the religious philosophies of Winthrop and Franklin contrasted greatly.
Another difference between these two men was their views on money. The economic growth of the region contributed to the downfall of Puritanism and the overall change of Boston. Nash and Graves write, “The ninety years that separated Winthrop’s Boston from Franklin’s had witnessed a gradual erosion of spiritual energies. The initial New England ideal of a