Essay About Journal Article And Good Example

How to Critically Read a Journal Article
The aim of this tutorial is help students gain awareness in how to critically analyse journal articles, to sensitize students to differences in journals and to encourage students to be discerning. For week 2’s tutorial, please do the following: Please read the article “Talent and time together: The impact of human capital and overlapping tenure on unit performance” and complete the Table 1 below.Please read the article “Talent tensions ahead: A CEO briefing” and complete Table 2 below. Table 1. Crtitical Reading of a Journal ArticleArticle referenceHarris, C. M., McMahan, G. C., and Wright, P. M. (2012). Talent and time together: The impact of human capital and overlapping tenure on unit performance. Personnel Review, 41 (4): 408-427. Journal/outlet website addressAim What is its main aim, the problem it addresses, &/or the contribution it seeks to make?To find out if there is a relationship between human capital and job performanceDoes it specify its research questions and/or objectives?Yes, in the abstract and objectives section.PerspectiveWhat is the author’s perspective? To prove there is a clear direct correlation between HC and performance. A deductive approach.Does the article review literature in the field?Yes it reviews and cites several notable literature.MethodWhat methods are used? How are they justified? They look at winning % , end of year rankings and tenure of players, coaches and team overall.Who are the participants?230 NCAA Basketball teamHow was the sample size arrived at? Basketball was a good example as the human capital directly impacts performance. They used 230 teams that were available to them.How were the data collected?Various, stats and tenure were collected from ESPN and other sources.Does the article discuss (eg) validity and reliability?Yes it critiques its own evaluation of tenure due to red shirt years and transfer of players and walk on recruitsData analysis and resultsWhat statistical or qualitative techniques are used for analysis?Mode, mean, standard deviation, Is it clear how the results are arrived at?There should be a more clear definition of the models used but the tables show this clearly.Findings What are the main findings?That there is a clear influence in the amount of human capital invested and a positive returnDoes the article identify and discuss its own limitations?Yes, in the conclusion it identifies clear limitations of the study.EvaluationDoes it achieve its aims?Yes there is a clear correlation between ‘good’ human capital and performance on the field including coaching tenure. “a positive influence”Strong points?Is done over a season and considers tenure of players as well as quality of recruitment. Coaching tenure is also considered as the main way Weak points?Rivals is a subjective viewpoint, an analyst can be wrong about a player easily despite seeing him or her play.What did you agree with?I agree that a team does better when youj play the players who are performing and a team does better when they work together longer (tenure)What did you disagree with?Using only one set of rankings, the AP sets out a ranking system with the #1 team in the nation being that which won the finals. They could have used several rankings.Basketball skills have no clear relationship with business acumen. What makes for a good quality journal? There’s no simple or single set of criteria regarding what makes for a good quality journal.While we ask you to make use of quality academic journals on this module, you don’t need to limit yourself solely to this type. For the purpose of your assignments, practitioner publications (such as articles on the CIPD website) are also likely to be relevant.It’s important to show that you’re aware that widely differing types of source are available. For example, differentiate between a peer-reviewed academic journal article and an internet article on a consultancy company’s website – you might give more weight to claims published in the former than in the latter.     Note that not all e-journals available via the Library are of the same quality. The following is the kind of information that could help you assess quality. As an exercise, compare what you can find out about the two journals listed below.Table 2. What makes for a good quality journal?Journal/outlet namePersonnel ReviewMcKinsey QuarterlyArticleHarris, C. M., McMahan, G. C., and Wright, P. M. (2012). Talent and time together: The impact of human capital and overlapping tenure on unit performance. Personnel Review, 41 (4): 408-427.Dobbs, R., Lund, S., and Madgavkar, A. (2012). Talent tensions ahead: A CEO brief. McKinsey Quarterly. November 2012. Journal/outlet website address