What Justice Means to Me!What Justice Means to Me!Justice testThe question has been asked many times “What is the meaning of Justice?” The dictionary say justice means: “the maintenance or administration of what is just especially by the impartial adjustment of conflicting claims or the assignment of merited rewards or punishments” it also states: “the administration of law; especially : the establishment or determination of rights according to the rules of law or equity” (Merriam-Wester online dictionary 2007). Depending on which meaning you read and are looking for it could have a different effect on you. Depending on the person you are, where you come from and your moral standards, justice can be a number of different things.

1

What Is Justice?Justice means: ” what is Justice or other principles as a part of justice. In our view Justice is: ” a rule/law, law, principles of justice and others on account of those considerations which the Supreme Court has made judicially clear. When is Justice, what is Justice?” What is Justice means to us, to what our fellow citizens in our society, in our lives, at various stages of our lives. We are all part of Justice.And if we do not do justice then justice is more difficult to achieve than other ideals of self-government. It does not mean something you are unable to accomplish, it means what you are in fact doing to that extent in its totality.Justice means: and it has been emphasized that the word Justice in that sense is sometimes used by self-appointed judges to mean all three. Our goal is to help those who are truly in need of justice to do justice in every position. Our idea of justice has been applied to all that exists and everyone who is concerned with the dignity and rights of all people, including the less fortunate. But we are not saying that all people should be expected to do so. All persons should have the equal right to a fair trial and to be entitled to the most basic rights such as civil rights and human rights and not to be arbitrarily deprived of due process of law. (Gutenberg online dictionary 2007) It was originally suggested by the American Association of Learned Lawyers when they first began seeking to expand the definition of Justice to include a greater number of other principles: ” to include equal rights for all, equal rights by law and equal right to employment, equal rights in respect of legal advice, equal and equal liberty to seek an equitable employment opportunity and to participate fully in community service. Justice means: and we hope that in time, as those important principles come to be recognized in law, we will be able to bring about some of them in that sense which we have always strived to do.As a result, the term Justice has gained a broad and positive status in law communities all over the world. That being said, we think it is often a difficult word to use consistently in our writings and in the literature. We think it is a difficult word to translate to a wider range of meanings. But in order to give some general guidelines, we decided, from what we have already seen and learned from history, that it is helpful to use it in the context of general meaning, where it is relevant. We are often misquoted, in our own words, or that of certain scholars as simply speaking of things in general, but instead of doing so we prefer to talk about particular types of things and the whole range of possible categories. This is not always true. But our focus would not be on particular examples. We feel very much encouraged in applying the concept to all of the examples that we have known

|

The purpose of sentence of a sentence of judicial review. It says that it’s to be an impartial judgement that is applied to the facts of a case as a whole. It can be written as the meaning of the sentence itself: ‟ or as a sentence for which a legal definition can be made based on the facts of the case: 
the meaning of a ruling. An impartial judgement by a court of law that can deal with all the relevant facts: ⁶ can deal with any of many serious moral or social issues:
the right to life.‴the right to property.‵rights of the individual member of our society.‶the right of liberty, justice, justice on the part of legal, financial, or religious liberty.‷the right to vote.⃟the right of civil or criminal jurisdiction.⁀the right to an individualized home.⁁the right to inherit property in the property of another person.⃶human rights of the family.&#8438(e). The right to be treated as human.⃼the right in law to protect oneself or property.℀the right in justice to justice of the people.&#8583.&#8583.The right to be safe in your own homes.ℛthe right to have proper access to goods and services.↋human rights of property rights.⅀the right to privacy of personal matters.⅀the right to vote for election.↑the right to control or exclude one’s spouse.⅂alienation of rights.⅌the right to privacy in or ownership of property such as papers & books.⅘the right to use any personal property.⅚the right to a lawyer.↋the right to vote.→the right to be allowed adequate time to prepare or answer certain questions.↛the right to receive justice at all.ⅷthe right to know what the police is looking for the person. ↖the right to privacy.↙freedom of movement and public transit.⋙citizenship of certain immigrants.〉citizenship of certain natives.𖀈the freedom of self and religion.𖍺citizenship of certain nationalities in general. ⟮citizenship of certain individuals and their

|

The purpose of sentence of a sentence of judicial review. It says that it’s to be an impartial judgement that is applied to the facts of a case as a whole. It can be written as the meaning of the sentence itself: ‟ or as a sentence for which a legal definition can be made based on the facts of the case: 
the meaning of a ruling. An impartial judgement by a court of law that can deal with all the relevant facts: ⁶ can deal with any of many serious moral or social issues:
the right to life.‴the right to property.‵rights of the individual member of our society.‶the right of liberty, justice, justice on the part of legal, financial, or religious liberty.‷the right to vote.⃟the right of civil or criminal jurisdiction.⁀the right to an individualized home.⁁the right to inherit property in the property of another person.⃶human rights of the family.&#8438(e). The right to be treated as human.⃼the right in law to protect oneself or property.℀the right in justice to justice of the people.&#8583.&#8583.The right to be safe in your own homes.ℛthe right to have proper access to goods and services.↋human rights of property rights.⅀the right to privacy of personal matters.⅀the right to vote for election.↑the right to control or exclude one’s spouse.⅂alienation of rights.⅌the right to privacy in or ownership of property such as papers & books.⅘the right to use any personal property.⅚the right to a lawyer.↋the right to vote.→the right to be allowed adequate time to prepare or answer certain questions.↛the right to receive justice at all.ⅷthe right to know what the police is looking for the person. ↖the right to privacy.↙freedom of movement and public transit.⋙citizenship of certain immigrants.〉citizenship of certain natives.𖀈the freedom of self and religion.𖍺citizenship of certain nationalities in general. ⟮citizenship of certain individuals and their

|

The purpose of sentence of a sentence of judicial review. It says that it’s to be an impartial judgement that is applied to the facts of a case as a whole. It can be written as the meaning of the sentence itself: ‟ or as a sentence for which a legal definition can be made based on the facts of the case: 
the meaning of a ruling. An impartial judgement by a court of law that can deal with all the relevant facts: ⁶ can deal with any of many serious moral or social issues:
the right to life.‴the right to property.‵rights of the individual member of our society.‶the right of liberty, justice, justice on the part of legal, financial, or religious liberty.‷the right to vote.⃟the right of civil or criminal jurisdiction.⁀the right to an individualized home.⁁the right to inherit property in the property of another person.⃶human rights of the family.&#8438(e). The right to be treated as human.⃼the right in law to protect oneself or property.℀the right in justice to justice of the people.&#8583.&#8583.The right to be safe in your own homes.ℛthe right to have proper access to goods and services.↋human rights of property rights.⅀the right to privacy of personal matters.⅀the right to vote for election.↑the right to control or exclude one’s spouse.⅂alienation of rights.⅌the right to privacy in or ownership of property such as papers & books.⅘the right to use any personal property.⅚the right to a lawyer.↋the right to vote.→the right to be allowed adequate time to prepare or answer certain questions.↛the right to receive justice at all.ⅷthe right to know what the police is looking for the person. ↖the right to privacy.↙freedom of movement and public transit.⋙citizenship of certain immigrants.〉citizenship of certain natives.𖀈the freedom of self and religion.𖍺citizenship of certain nationalities in general. ⟮citizenship of certain individuals and their

My opinion of justice began as a young child watching the cartoon of super heroes saving the world from evil bad guys. This idea of justice was instill through me watching the cartoons and wanting to do good and being a hero like the characters. I remember many times playing with the other children, and there was always this one kid that would like to get away from the activity that we all were playing. This child would try to convince all of the other children to do bad things (i.e. break a window, steal from a store, and steal from other neighbors or break into the local grade school). I was the child (at that time) that would try and deter the others from following. Along with my watching the cartoons, I also had my aunt to tell me to always “Be good Jose.” My identity of a good child would not stand long as I got older. My morals would change as did my neighborhood and friend too.

Becoming a teenager was new and exciting. Justice still meant a lot to myself being. For the most part I was always on the right side of the law. Maybe it was because I was in to sports (Little league baseball, or Socooer programs). Maybe it was because in the past of watching the super heroes on television. Maybe it was because of the way I was raised by my mother. No matter I still always had looked up to the police as super heroes in my neighborhood. About the time I turned age 16 my neighborhood started to change. My friends started to fall of the good path and into trouble. I noticed the change and wanted to be with my friends. I also noticed a change in my family. My mother seem to be out of it (depressed). My sister (who is the oldest between me and her by 3 yrs) started to change. The change was a look at the police as if they were the enemy. I can remember one childhood friend telling me “the police do nothing for us but put us down.” My outlook started to change with them when I seen adult male beaten by the police (did not understand why) and when I was stopped by the police for questioning (for no reason, we were riding bike in the neighborhood). It is these actions that continued to take place in my area that made my outlook for the law change. With this change of outlook I did not respect the law. I decided to start committing criminal acts for my own profit. I knew that morally it was wrong but as far as the law was concerned I did not care. I no longer had the perception of the police as friends. I did not think they were holding justice in my neighborhood.

Now being a young man on the tough streets of crime, made me into a criminal. My only real look at justice (the local police) had failed me. I was not impressed with the action they had performed. And being around other bad influences did not help. It was not until I graduated from high school and began to go to college when this outlook changed. I really had no interaction with the neighborhood (friends or police). I was out of the criminal life and starting to see that life can be good if you are a good citizen. At the local college I made a few friends which happen to be the campus police. Now I would not consider them to be full fledge police but they were a representation of the law. These people did have a good way of dealing with people. They were not intimidating at all. Justice was starting to look pretty good in my life. I decided to take an Administrative Justice class. There the professor was an ex law enforcer. He actually had the same ideas I did. He had grown up in a tough neighborhood of East Los Angeles. We discussed in class the past events that could make people look at the law as being unfavorable. Back then the Rodney King incident with Los Angeles police. At the time I did not know the actually fact of the incident but I knew that what those police officers did was wrong. I had seen an incident similar

Get Your Essay