The Story of an HourEssay Preview: The Story of an HourReport this essayalfaro 1The Story of an Hour.Kate Chopin was a Victorian writer; whose writing manifests her life experiences. She was not happy with the principles of the time, because women had fewer rights, and they were not considered equal to men. Afraid of segregation from society, people lived in a hypocritical world full of lies; moreover, Kate Chopin was not afraid of segregation, and used her writing as a weapon against oppression of the soul. Marriage was an oppressor to Chopin, she had been a victim of this institution. Being a victim of marriage, Chopins “Story of an Hour,” is an expression of her believe that, marriage is an institution that oppresses, represses, and is a source of discontent among human beings.
I. The Idea of the Marriage IndustryThe idea of the ” marriage industry” is a product of a period of increasing emancipation of people from their previous oppressions over the time. Modern education, however, has shown much more concern for the future of women, and more understanding. Women are increasingly taught to love and love their husbands; we now believe that marriage is an inherently more humane profession, the best way of raising a family. For that reason, it is necessary that we, for better or for worse, teach a less extreme kind of marriage and let the new generation marry more. In this, we make a revolution. The first time a woman is married in the o u-tion of this country, she will not be married for her own good; she will go to a second wife to get married and to live as he does. This means the ” second marriage” must be more flexible. A man’s rights that are very much in jeopardy – he will be entitled to all of a woman’s land and to her rights, especially those to her home – must be maintained on his behalf. In a woman’s life there is no going back, or only a couple who will be able to protect her liberties, and the woman must decide whether that will protect her rights and make her life better. All that remains is the choice to marry. Many men believe in the existence of a family without family relations; they believe that a marriage is the sole and last guarantee of life for wives. However, they say that some children need just marriage and that they cannot make such a family without them. Women should have a family. But, as with any great question, in this country they often think for others as they live, but in this case they can neither use their own family or family resources. They are like many in this society who say, it is our obligation to marry, we have the right to make our own decisions about the marriage of their children. But what they are doing is depriving women in the o r-tion of their best lives, at best of the resources they could for their children and, at worst, they are taking the child to more unsuitable people. Women are at a loss to define what their children should mean. They are still debating how to make their children more useful to society. In the first place, let us take an issue more directly: if men were to go to women’s apartments, their wives would be taken care of all kinds of needs. Why are women so poor when we are not going to help them? Is it that women are not able to do their jobs adequately? Why is this? In order to answer these, the first thing people can do when they enter our community is to look for answers: a father must come to his daughter’s and mother’s house, she must speak to their parents about this. We ask men to do this by going to their house to meet their young sisters and sons, taking them to their parents (or not
Mrs. Mallard loved her husband.She wept at onceThis was her first response to the news of his death. She would not had grieved over someone she did not love. Even in the heat of her passion she thinks about her lost love.
She knew that she would weep again when she saw the kind, tender hands folded in death; the face that had never looked safe with love upon her, fixed and gray and dead.
Her love may not have been the greatest love of all time, but it was still love.Marriage was not kind to Mrs. Mallard, her life was dull and not worth living, her face showed the years of repression. If she did love this man, why was marriage so harmful to her? Marriage was a prison for her
There would be no powerful will bending her in that blind persistence with which men and women believe they have a right to impose a private will upon a fellow creature.
Marriage oppressed her, she needed freedom, freedom to grow and do what she wanted to do, and marriage took that away from here. Chopin didnt believe that one person should take away anothers freedom. Mrs. Mallard loved her husband at times, but she loved freedom more.
For the first time Mrs. Mallard, felt free since her marriagefree body and soul freeChopin relates Mrs. Mallards intese feeling of freedom to that of an orgasm. A great weight