FreedomFreedomFreedom is a word we use to describe certain things that we are allowed to do. We are free to vote, free to speak freely, & free to practice any religion, but these do not give us the same kind of freedom as one gets from fulfilling ones duty. We teach our children The Principle of Human Freedom. We teach our children that to be free to choose we must accept responsibility for our choices. To accept responsibility for our choices means we accept our current condition of life or we choose to change it. As we make our choices in pursuit of Life, Liberty and Happiness; we recognize we must work hard and earn our own way. As we compete to improve our lives we must treat our fellow Human Beings with Dignity, Respect and Fairness. In return we expect to be treated also with the same Dignity, Respect and Fairness. Human Beings are the most precious
{End}
{End}
1-2-3.1.1. Humanists are also human anarchists. In fact, they often do quite a good job of explaining the philosophical foundation of libertarianism. They argue that while both humanism and free speech are useful, they also apply a dangerous set of ideological and historical limits to our freedom to live our lives. Thus, even libertarians are prone to “diversity” when they are aware of this. In this light, humanism is, in practice, a mixture of various different ideologies. However, within each community, or within individuals, the social order, or any other society, is very much a collective. Anonymity, free speech, a basic right to property, individual liberty, and freedom of religion are all essential elements. By creating a social order that is consistent with the fundamental principles of humanism, humanists are able to build on the foundations of humanism to make a world they can live on, and thus live on.
2-3-4.1.1. Humanist anarchism seeks a political and ethical structure that includes non-violence and humanist philosophy. It rejects the traditional political system, and seeks a model within which a community is led by anarchists, in a natural environment where cooperation and cooperation between community members is maintained. It focuses on building a cooperative humanist society, rather than seeking a society where individuals and groups live happily in harmony through mutual cooperation and mutual responsibility.
2-4-3.1.2 Humanist anarchism wants to create a society where personal liberty extends its reach not through direct coercion, but through social and judicial equality. In this way, the humanist philosophy can be used to provide the basis for a society that focuses on justice, equality, and human rights. Humans are free to think and live freely, as in the social system of socialism. However, in a society structured around mutual and mutual protection, they are free to make those choices. Humanists have long argued that social justice and human rights require a moral framework to be developed. Thus, without such a framework, the humanist philosophy is essentially a political and economic theory that is based on violence and other forms of violence, such as murder, pillaging, and the like. Thus, humanists reject traditional political systems, as exemplified by the political system of social democracy which does not allow for an abstract moral framework to be developed for human life. Humanists do not believe that human beings are limited beings or that there are any ethical precepts or values which can substitute for the universal human need to live as part of a community.
3-4-3.1.3 Humanist anarchism is a philosophy of living without a set of economic laws, like tariffs. Without such a set of laws, free people are helpless in a society ruled by the state and those that possess the means to achieve their aims are subject to confiscation. This means that the only way for a given individual to achieve his full potential after living their life independently in a society where economic and social rules were respected and people were encouraged to live in harmony is through natural, non-violence and a voluntary system of social organization. Without such a system, an individual would remain powerless to fight against the threats of violence and other forms of violence, and no political or economic system would exist to prevent and address