Advantages Of Collaboration
Essay Preview: Advantages Of Collaboration
Report this essay
Abstract
How does one successfully obtain assistance from individuals in other departments within the same company? It is important for departments to collaborate. Departments collaborate in both formal and informal settings. In this study it was established that companies continually trade off product quality, speed of delivery, and its associated costs to the provider and customer. The collaboration method of choice depends on the issue to resolve and the duration of the project at hand. The reasons why departments impede knowledge sharing were reviewed. Ways to encourage collaboration were addressed. A specific example using the Material Management and Accounting System as a way that information is shared across departments was explored to show the necessity of sharing information amongst departments.
Interdepartmental Collaboration
Introduction
Organizations are under increasing pressure to collaborate in order to improve performance. While collaboration is a popular, seemingly uncontroversial concept it often is difficult to implement. How does one successfully collaborate with individuals in other departments within the same organization? While collaboration is critical between individuals working within an organization it is especially complicated when the organization is geographically dispersed across sites within a single city, or across numerous states or countries. Lets look at what industry and a researcher say about interdepartmental collaboration.
Jason Compton wrote in Customer Relationship Management CRM Magazine, “Without collaboration across departments, and the ability to cross stovepipes with customer information, a successful CRM strategy is impossible,” says Liz Shahnam, a vice president at Meta Group Inc. “Many of the failure rates that have been quoted in the media are really not a failure of CRM technology or even CRM projects, its a failure of the organization to communicate effectively across the enterprise.” To survive in an increasingly competitive business environment, enterprises must collaborate effectively and coordinate customer processes across as many functions and business processes as possible, analysts and industry executives say” (Shahnam as stated in Compton, 2002, 1).
Additionally Luo stated in his article on Cross-Functional Coopetition that, “Scholars in marketing and strategic management argue that knowledge transfer across functional boundaries is critical for numerous outcomes, including new product success, organizational learning and overall firm performance” (Luo, Slotegraaf, & Pan, 2006, 67). Before knowledge can play a critical role the firms market knowledge must be transferred or disseminated across departments (Luo, Slotegraaf, & Pan, 2006, 67). This transfer of knowledge across functional boundaries can be rather difficult and complicated (Luo et al.).
Ways to Collaborate
There are a finite number of ways to collaborate. These include from the most formal to the least formal way via data input to established systems and processes, such as Material Management and Accounting System (MMAS) which will be discussed later; writing in the form of contracts, letters and email; and through discussion face-to-face in both group and individual settings. The way one chooses to collaborate depends on the duration of the project at hand.
We continually trade off product quality, speed of delivery, and its associated costs to the provider and customer. The collaboration method of choice then depends on the issue to resolve. If the issue is a one time or ad hoc request then using an informal method is perhaps the media of choice. Collaboration takes time and with good informal networks in place the informal network can be much quicker to respond than taking time to receive a formal response. On the other hand, when attempting to answer questions that will be answered repeatedly it is beneficial to build an infrastructure in the form of a system to speed the consistent and accurate response to a given set of question. One is able to query a system for some piece of required knowledge. Some excellent systems have such a good interface the user gets a sense of being one with the system or the system anticipates the user needs. The system is described as being intuitive. Building an infrastructure costs resources. An analogy may be useful here comparing whether you are building a residential house of wood or a commercial building of steel, also the Brothers Grimm childhood story, “The Three Little Pigs” comes to mind and their houses built of straw, twigs and brick.
Organization
This research discussion will address some of the benefits both employees and companies yield when collaborating. Next, we will look at typical reasons why departments may be reluctant to assist others. We will then look at ways to encourage collaboration between departments. Finally, we will explore ways departments bring specialized knowledge to the organization.
Even though departments can be reluctant to assist others without specific knowledge in the ways they benefit because of their own time and resource limitations, unrelated departments should collaborate with one another to be a more effective organization. Better deliverables are produced when using expertise from different departments within the company and different departments are able to bring specialized knowledge from its breath to benefit the organization.
Benefit to Organizations
Better use of People
Although a project may be on target with respect to scope, cost, and schedule, a successful project manager realizes that people issues can have a profound effect on the ultimate success of that project and other projects that may follow. Project performance may be judged on people issues such as trust, team spirit, morale, responsiveness, punctuality, customer focus, communications, teamwork, conflict resolution, integrity, honesty, sociability and flexibility not to mention cost and quality performance indicators (Rad 2002).
With the understanding of the importance of departmental interaction and the sharing of information we find better decision making takes place when employees take ownership. When information is shared, the workplace becomes a more interesting and fun place to be. Diversified ideas are considered to improve decision making outcomes. Employee engagement relates to their situation within the organization, the perspective from their vantage point and collective experience. For example,