China and United StatesIn this article you will find out how two different countries argue about how much money they make in the same products as Apple and IBM. I peak this article because I never thought that two countries will argue bout the same products or how much money the countries will make for the same. I read Chapter I of the book an as soon I was done reading I understood what International Marketing means. This article is about how China and United States argue about increasing or decreasing in shipment and profits.
The indifference about two countries and how over pass the global economy:China Overtakes U.S. as Largest Market for PCs*China vs. United Stated*Personal computer shipments between China and USA*The difference between Apples computers and IBM, and HP*How China was the biggest largest computer market*Worlds market for tablets will exceed 230 million units by 2015China Overtakes U.S. as Largest Market for PCsFirst Cars, Now Computers — Move Underscores China as Important EconomyPublished: August 23, 2011Lenovo Chairman Liu ChuanzhiChina probably overtook the U.S. as the largest personal-computer market last quarter, after three decades of American dominance in an industry pioneered by Apple and IBM.
•
* The U.S. and China are the biggest two customers of mobile gadgets. The United States is considered the dominant country, while China is the fastest growing of other countries. This reflects the strong trade policy between the U.S. and China and their use of third countries as a vehicle to drive market share and share and influence.China has developed rapidly to accommodate growing market and demand and will continue to do so for the foreseeable future.The total volume of a third country’s demand will be greater in three years than that of U.S. markets combined. (As of the end of the 2010-11 financial year, China’s total volume of the third country’s ecommerce had increased by 6.7 percent to 21.5 million.)By adding a third country, these products will have increased demand, especially for Chinese consumers. This should not be considered as a negative.China is also in a very good position and it can continue to add customers as it does. More and more companies, especially those in China, are opening in Asia or the Middle East (especially in China). China should consider its own international market and international market environment to help to provide access to China’s global ecommerce market.One factor the U.S. needs is to create international competition and develop its own strong mobile app presence.China’s market share in smartphone app downloads, including China Mobile, is growing dramatically, but growth has slowed across all regions of the globe. This represents a problem for the U.S. because it will need to adapt its mobile mobile penetration more and more effectively to compete in a rapidly changing market environment.If the U.S. can become an international player, it will need to adapt its mobile device offerings to serve a growing number of needs in the emerging market. It can also choose more local partners, like Google, rather than rely on a small-group monopoly in Asia, where it is very likely to win.This situation is extremely complex, but it’s probably not a bad move because it offers Chinese mobile players in the smartphone app market some unique opportunities to take advantage of this new opportunity. That is, if companies in China can establish strong local partners, you have to compete with U.S. players, not with Chinese competitors.It would become even more important for Beijing to create a strong national network of mobile operators and their local partners to compete effectively with their local competitors in their own field of supply.The U.S. is more flexible than other countries on the mobile handset market because it doesn’t rely on U.S. companies to carry more than the market share. Instead, in many cases, you can leverage its mobile system for a high volume of applications
* The U.S. and China are the biggest two customers of mobile gadgets. The United States is considered the dominant country, while China is the fastest growing of other countries. This reflects the strong trade policy between the U.S. and China and their use of third countries as a vehicle to drive market share and share and influence.China has developed rapidly to accommodate growing market and demand and will continue to do so for the foreseeable future.The total volume of a third country’s demand will be greater in three years than that of U.S. markets combined. (As of the end of the 2010-11 financial year, China’s total volume of the third country’s ecommerce had increased by 6.7 percent to 21.5 million.)By adding a third country, these products will have increased demand, especially for Chinese consumers. This should not be considered as a negative.China is also in a very good position and it can continue to add customers as it does. More and more companies, especially those in China, are opening in Asia or the Middle East (especially in China). China should consider its own international market and international market environment to help to provide access to China’s global ecommerce market.One factor the U.S. needs is to create international competition and develop its own strong mobile app presence.China’s market share in smartphone app downloads, including China Mobile, is growing dramatically, but growth has slowed across all regions of the globe. This represents a problem for the U.S. because it will need to adapt its mobile mobile penetration more and more effectively to compete in a rapidly changing market environment.If the U.S. can become an international player, it will need to adapt its mobile device offerings to serve a growing number of needs in the emerging market. It can also choose more local partners, like Google, rather than rely on a small-group monopoly in Asia, where it is very likely to win.This situation is extremely complex, but it’s probably not a bad move because it offers Chinese mobile players in the smartphone app market some unique opportunities to take advantage of this new opportunity. That is, if companies in China can establish strong local partners, you have to compete with U.S. players, not with Chinese competitors.It would become even more important for Beijing to create a strong national network of mobile operators and their local partners to compete effectively with their local competitors in their own field of supply.The U.S. is more flexible than other countries on the mobile handset market because it doesn’t rely on U.S. companies to carry more than the market share. Instead, in many cases, you can leverage its mobile system for a high volume of applications
* The U.S. and China are the biggest two customers of mobile gadgets. The United States is considered the dominant country, while China is the fastest growing of other countries. This reflects the strong trade policy between the U.S. and China and their use of third countries as a vehicle to drive market share and share and influence.China has developed rapidly to accommodate growing market and demand and will continue to do so for the foreseeable future.The total volume of a third country’s demand will be greater in three years than that of U.S. markets combined. (As of the end of the 2010-11 financial year, China’s total volume of the third country’s ecommerce had increased by 6.7 percent to 21.5 million.)By adding a third country, these products will have increased demand, especially for Chinese consumers. This should not be considered as a negative.China is also in a very good position and it can continue to add customers as it does. More and more companies, especially those in China, are opening in Asia or the Middle East (especially in China). China should consider its own international market and international market environment to help to provide access to China’s global ecommerce market.One factor the U.S. needs is to create international competition and develop its own strong mobile app presence.China’s market share in smartphone app downloads, including China Mobile, is growing dramatically, but growth has slowed across all regions of the globe. This represents a problem for the U.S. because it will need to adapt its mobile mobile penetration more and more effectively to compete in a rapidly changing market environment.If the U.S. can become an international player, it will need to adapt its mobile device offerings to serve a growing number of needs in the emerging market. It can also choose more local partners, like Google, rather than rely on a small-group monopoly in Asia, where it is very likely to win.This situation is extremely complex, but it’s probably not a bad move because it offers Chinese mobile players in the smartphone app market some unique opportunities to take advantage of this new opportunity. That is, if companies in China can establish strong local partners, you have to compete with U.S. players, not with Chinese competitors.It would become even more important for Beijing to create a strong national network of mobile operators and their local partners to compete effectively with their local competitors in their own field of supply.The U.S. is more flexible than other countries on the mobile handset market because it doesn’t rely on U.S. companies to carry more than the market share. Instead, in many cases, you can leverage its mobile system for a high volume of applications
* The U.S. and China are the biggest two customers of mobile gadgets. The United States is considered the dominant country, while China is the fastest growing of other countries. This reflects the strong trade policy between the U.S. and China and their use of third countries as a vehicle to drive market share and share and influence.China has developed rapidly to accommodate growing market and demand and will continue to do so for the foreseeable future.The total volume of a third country’s demand will be greater in three years than that of U.S. markets combined. (As of the end of the 2010-11 financial year, China’s total volume of the third country’s ecommerce had increased by 6.7 percent to 21.5 million.)By adding a third country, these products will have increased demand, especially for Chinese consumers. This should not be considered as a negative.China is also in a very good position and it can continue to add customers as it does. More and more companies, especially those in China, are opening in Asia or the Middle East (especially in China). China should consider its own international market and international market environment to help to provide access to China’s global ecommerce market.One factor the U.S. needs is to create international competition and develop its own strong mobile app presence.China’s market share in smartphone app downloads, including China Mobile, is growing dramatically, but growth has slowed across all regions of the globe. This represents a problem for the U.S. because it will need to adapt its mobile mobile penetration more and more effectively to compete in a rapidly changing market environment.If the U.S. can become an international player, it will need to adapt its mobile device offerings to serve a growing number of needs in the emerging market. It can also choose more local partners, like Google, rather than rely on a small-group monopoly in Asia, where it is very likely to win.This situation is extremely complex, but it’s probably not a bad move because it offers Chinese mobile players in the smartphone app market some unique opportunities to take advantage of this new opportunity. That is, if companies in China can establish strong local partners, you have to compete with U.S. players, not with Chinese competitors.It would become even more important for Beijing to create a strong national network of mobile operators and their local partners to compete effectively with their local competitors in their own field of supply.The U.S. is more flexible than other countries on the mobile handset market because it doesn’t rely on U.S. companies to carry more than the market share. Instead, in many cases, you can leverage its mobile system for a high volume of applications
Personal-computer shipments in China rose 14% to 18.5 million units during the second quarter, the first time they surpassed the number in the U.S., where they fell 4.8% to 17.7 million, Bryan Ma, an analyst at research firm IDC, said in an interview today. On a full-year basis, China will likely pass the U.S. in 2012, he said.
RELATED STORIESHP Moves Part of Trend Where Businesses Bank on Services, SolutionsLargest PC Maker Eschews Low-Margin, Commodity CategoriesThe estimates highlight the growing importance of Chinas consumers to the global economy after the country passed the U.S. in 2009 as the largest auto market. Hewlett-Packard, the worlds largest PC maker, indicated this month it may pull out of that business, while Chinas Lenovo Group posted quarterly profit that almost doubled.
“This was going to happen sooner or later, just like with the car