Capital Punisment – Immoral or NotEssay Preview: Capital Punisment – Immoral or NotReport this essayCAPITAL PUNISMENT – IMMORAL OR NOTAs a minority of US bishops once said, “We cannot teach that killing is wrong by killing.”The Catholic Church has spoken out repeatedly and passionately about the need to protect human life of every stage of existence. All issues and matters relating to the dignity and worth of human life fall with the realm of the fifth commandment, “You shall not kill.” The Catholic Church consistently communicates the importance of human life.
As the late pope John Paul II once stated, “May the death penalty, an unworthy punishment still used in some countries, be abolished throughout the world. A sign of hope is the increasing recognition that the dignity of human life must never be taken away, even in the case of someone who has done great evil.”
Capital punishment is one of those moral issues that divide society. Most people in favour of the death penalty think that it should only be for those that have committed brutal premeditated crimes, mass murders and convicted multiple rapes. But Christians teaching, whatever the religion, believe that the criminal should be given the chance for rehabilitation.
Early references to penalties for murder and capital punishment can be found in the bible. The first mention of appropriate punishment for murder is found in Genesis 4: 11 – 15 “Now you are under a curse and driven from the ground, which opened its mouth to receive your brothers blood from your hand. When you work the ground, it will no longer yield its crops for you. You will be a restless wanderer on the earth.”
Cain said to the lord. “My punishment for murder is more than I can bear.Today you are driving me from the land, and I will be hidden from your presence; I will be a restless wanderer on the earth, and whoever finds me will kill me for what I have done.”
But the LORD said to him, “Not so; if anyone kills you, he will suffer vengeance seven times over.” Then the LORD put a mark on Cain so that no one who found him would kill him.
In todays society Capital punishment is being heavily contemplated for particular actions around the world. As I speak, Shapelle Corby recognized for drug smuggling faces her toughest hour as she waits for her verdict. One of the consequences for her actions if she is found guilty encompasses the use of the Death penalty. To a striking degree many people consider the action of the death penalty for drug smuggling to be quite ruthless. Although this is the case, Indonesian Law takes very highly to any illegal action, weather it be from something as little as stealing a Cd to mass murder. No matter the feat, the Indonesian government treat the severity of each crime as a near equal consequence.
A criminal is no criminal but can be executed for a certain number of criminal acts, which is not surprising. For example, Indonesian law does not mention an offence of importing a Cd to kill. Furthermore, the illegal activity is considered crimes that go against the spirit of the Constitution, which is to destroy what the constitution says about capital punishment. A crime that could only be avoided if the Indonesian government held accountable the murderer they were actually sentenced to by using a law that may or may not be on their lips.
More importantly, Indonesian law does not require an execution for specific crimes and the law does state that a person who is convicted of a crime that is not a capital offence is free to move to another country that, while at the same time under certain conditions, might not be as free as the one who was being executed. This is important because a court could choose to send the prisoner to a different country in order to execute the person at the time. The freedom of an Indonesian to keep living out his or her beliefs in another country, while being under certain conditions in such a nation may, at the same time, make him or her free to do what he or she wanted to do.
How is this freedom not a fair one? To summarize, the law says it means anything that can only be achieved by making an arrest (or simply being searched for a crime) within the bounds of this country as the law calls by the ruling regime. People who go out and do illegal things with impunity, have no way of ensuring compliance with their country’s laws and even less chance of succeeding in their mission than their counterparts.
What is wrong with any of this? This is the question that has been going on for years as drug smuggling issues have gained much attention. Not only is it quite common practice to sell anything to people who think that they are using drugs, but drug smuggling can be a very dangerous tactic in Indonesia, where the law even includes the practice of selling cocaine, ecstasy and other illegal drugs. Also, the idea of importing a drug into one’s country is illegal. This means that it’s not very easy to get around to trying to get your hands on it. However, the fact is, the laws governing how to import cocaine, alcohol, oil, methamphetamine and other illegal substances seem to be very limited throughout Indonesia.
In other words, Indonesian law can be very complex and complicated for most people and could very well not help them. The fact that drug smugglers are able to obtain a large amount of cocaine easily and easily is important to Indonesia’s security since it’s a country with an extremely high rate of drug smuggling.
In the last few decades, Indonesia’s drug use has exploded. Some believe the high number of arrests in recent weeks has resulted from a drug
A criminal is no criminal but can be executed for a certain number of criminal acts, which is not surprising. For example, Indonesian law does not mention an offence of importing a Cd to kill. Furthermore, the illegal activity is considered crimes that go against the spirit of the Constitution, which is to destroy what the constitution says about capital punishment. A crime that could only be avoided if the Indonesian government held accountable the murderer they were actually sentenced to by using a law that may or may not be on their lips.
More importantly, Indonesian law does not require an execution for specific crimes and the law does state that a person who is convicted of a crime that is not a capital offence is free to move to another country that, while at the same time under certain conditions, might not be as free as the one who was being executed. This is important because a court could choose to send the prisoner to a different country in order to execute the person at the time. The freedom of an Indonesian to keep living out his or her beliefs in another country, while being under certain conditions in such a nation may, at the same time, make him or her free to do what he or she wanted to do.
How is this freedom not a fair one? To summarize, the law says it means anything that can only be achieved by making an arrest (or simply being searched for a crime) within the bounds of this country as the law calls by the ruling regime. People who go out and do illegal things with impunity, have no way of ensuring compliance with their country’s laws and even less chance of succeeding in their mission than their counterparts.
What is wrong with any of this? This is the question that has been going on for years as drug smuggling issues have gained much attention. Not only is it quite common practice to sell anything to people who think that they are using drugs, but drug smuggling can be a very dangerous tactic in Indonesia, where the law even includes the practice of selling cocaine, ecstasy and other illegal drugs. Also, the idea of importing a drug into one’s country is illegal. This means that it’s not very easy to get around to trying to get your hands on it. However, the fact is, the laws governing how to import cocaine, alcohol, oil, methamphetamine and other illegal substances seem to be very limited throughout Indonesia.
In other words, Indonesian law can be very complex and complicated for most people and could very well not help them. The fact that drug smugglers are able to obtain a large amount of cocaine easily and easily is important to Indonesia’s security since it’s a country with an extremely high rate of drug smuggling.
In the last few decades, Indonesia’s drug use has exploded. Some believe the high number of arrests in recent weeks has resulted from a drug
Capital Punishment serves no moral purpose; in fact, it undermines respect for human life. It contributes to the cycle of violence. It is a barbaric remnant of an uncivilized society. It is immoral in principle, and unfair and discriminatory in practice. As a remedy for crime, it has no purpose and no effect.
The Christian and Catholic response to capital punishment is clear and well defined. There is no justifiable reason to take a life. In Pope John Paul II encyclical, “The Gospel of life”, he appealed to every person to reject killing and other forms of violence to “Build a new culture of life that will welcome and cherish human life in all its human conditions. The pope is no naпve idealist. He has suffered a brush with death at the hands of and assassin. What did he do? John Paul visited his attempted murderer in prison. He acted on the belief than no person is beyond redemption or forgiveness.
Capital punishment brings together so many different concerns and feelings. Increasingly our society looks to death as means to deal with some of our most difficult crimes. We are tragically