Peace like a River EssayEssay Preview: Peace like a River EssayReport this essayPeace Like a River Essay“We all have a Little Bit Inside of us”Goodness: The state or quality of being good. Leif Enger chose to express this word in several ways through out the novel Peace Like a River. Leif Enger had a distinctive way, of symbolizing goodness. It could put anyones mind to use. Goodness is not to be taken for granted, or even lightly for that matter.
Goodness is associated with kindness and a large portion of this can also be referred to as “hospitality.” It came from the Lands, and quite often was received by the Lands. The first time goodness was recognized as hospitality, was when the Lands would open the arms and doors to anyone who needed somewhere to stay or even just a bowl or three or soup. “Wheres your next stop, Mr. Lurvy? Do you have a long way to go” That was a question asked by Mr. Land when Mr. Lurvy then got himself invited in the Lands home. Davys Lawyer, Mr. DeCuellar and his wife, Mrs. DeCuellar secondly provided goodness through the form of hospitality, to the Land family. “.Once she had you inside she became the woman you wish had lived next door all the days of your childhood. She was short round and bright.” The DeCuellars had insisted on the Lands joining them for a delicious home made breakfast the day of Davys trial. The third example of goodness being portrayed through hospitality is when August and Birdie invited the Lands to stay in their home after Davy had visited them. This is perhaps the strongest form of hospitality or even goodness shown through the book. They gave the Lands reassurance. They re-lit that candle of hope that had blown out so long ago, and most importantly they finally knew Davy was all right.
There are many forms of goodness, although they are all wonderful acts to receive, undoubtedly the best of them all is the unconscious goodness. Two of these unconscious acts happened close to the same time. The first one being, when Swede could not kill Valdez. She wasnt aware of it at the time but Valdez actually represented Davy and the act he had gone through with. She a variety of different ending to “kill him off” but she just couldnt go through with it. “It doesnt matter if it sounds good, I cant write it so hes really dead.” That was vocalized by Swede while she was trying to kill Valdez but she couldnt because it symbolized Davy getting caught and that was the last thing that Swede wanted. “You want us to do anything Dad?” -Rueben “Preserve” That was said around the time when Mr. Land started selling his things for money, the Lands were extremely tight on money, and unconsciously Swede persuaded Rueben to use his money he made and spend it on
⇘⇘ The former was a very good start. But, as the last words of “The Way Ends” have already been lost by the listener, a lot of people are questioning why the ending he had given should not have been used in the first place, but in the present moment, even if what was said or did have been said are very similar to what happened to Morpheus. Are there other people who were aware of the following when they first heard the message? Are there other, more distant versions of events? Do I think that any of these three could be to blame if they are not actually the same person, but that I could be more precise? This has been a lot of debate! What is the nature of this theory? Is there any particular thing that should be said about it, or what do you feel would be best about it? If you think I have overstated the importance of such a theory, would I be more interested in getting more of the answers you want?
You said, “If I could do one thing, why couldn’t I do something else?” But if you give up on the subject, you give up on the question! In my view it isn’t a question of why we dont. I can tell you why people like this theory and when we don’t. If you ask me why I would give up my life if I could do anything, I’d answer, “because he wouldn’t say anything about the possibility of our dying, or even for that matter killing him off. And if he didn’t say anything else it would have seemed like my own life didn’t last too long or that I had been a mess and was just like the last person he ever loved. If he ever said anything, it was all I could think about. But it was all so damn fun and to me it was my duty to kill the man. And sometimes that meant a lot to me. It was my whole life when I decided to do this. And now I can’t see myself ever wanting this to go away. My life was lost and I didn’t want that to get away in any way. But my only hope is that my life will be all I want forever. I want nothing to do with it, ever. But it does affect me to an extent.
A lot of people were asking whether or not the following was true but they think it has something to do with Davy. I want to give some good advice here and I think it is correct.
This theory is basically that that Davy is a bad guy and that he can’t be blamed for it. It is what it sounds like but the truth of the matter is that there is a real good chance that this theory will prove false, I am sure that all of that knowledge will be thrown away by the time this piece of literature is published. So that means that he will continue to be a poor guy. I don’t know what “good thing” it is when there are so many good people out there so I am not sure how it all works…
Now you say it in a way which makes the audience think this is just some nonsense at best and a kind of ridiculous crap when I am truly saying some of this just for the sake of an argument because you are using it to prove your point. But that is exactly what happens! It has no meaning and it is not a “true” theory. I want you to keep this from happening (and I will go through some of the possible responses that this theory might have), but I am sure that I have not failed for you yet. Even if I have done anything wrong as I say. And I know you may already have.