Gay MarriageEssay Preview: Gay MarriageReport this essayThey are no longer a small population, but a booming revolution. These groups do not hide themselves in burrows, but flamboyantly celebrate their identities. The gays are now a people willing and ready to be heard. It has come to all of our attentions that in the light of marriage they have been depraved and deceived. Homosexuals cannot allow this persecution to continue, as they are constantly forfeited equal rights. The arguments are of lifestyle differences and the legalized discrimination of these people. It encompasses same-sex marriage as a cause worth fighting and defending so that we all may be, “one Nation under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for all.”
Homosexuality is an accepted lifestyle nowadays. Almost everyone is in favor of equal rights for homosexuals. This includes equal rights to housing, government benefits, jobs, public accommodations, etc. Although many are in favor of equal rights granted to homosexuals, why do they not approve gay marriage?
Allowing homosexuals to participate in marriage will not degrade the institution of marriage. Who has the power to declare that marriage should only be between a man and a woman? No matter what, it all comes down to the fact that marriage is about love, sharing, and commitment. The separation of church and state should contribute to the outcome of this issue, being in favor of the gay community.
Denying gay marriage is a violation of religious freedom. The First Amendment of the Constitution sets out five basic liberties, including freedom of religion. Freedom of religion should also imply freedom from religion because “one does not truly have freedom of religion if one does not have the right to freedom from religion as well.” Freedom of religion is both a “protection of religious thought and practice, and a command of separation of church and state.” Therefore, religious beliefs cannot be integrated with the constitution. People say that gay marriage is immoral, but no one has the right to declare that it is immoral only because it is said in the Bible. The Bible has no say in the Constitution. If gay marriages were illegal, the constitution itself would be violating the very First Amendment of religious freedom because not all religions oppose homosexuality and gay marriage. For example, Buddhism does not oppose gay marriages. It rather, celebrates gay relationships freely and is in favor of legalizing gay marriages. If religion can allow same-sex marriage, why is it so hard for the government to do the same?
Going against the acceptance of same-sex marriage is a form of minority discrimination. Opponents state that marriage is a natural right, based on the need to procreate. These laws are made as if these couples are not “natural” or “normal”, to the point where it is suggested to use the concept of “civil unions”, rather than “marriages”. Is it absolutely wrong to grant them the validation of their marriage? For example, some argue that same-sex couples should not be allowed to raise children. It is not a matter of if the parents are of the same-sex or not, but it shows children what role marriage plays in society, and how it is important to be dedicated to one person, or partner. The growing acceptance of gay parenthood demonstrates that children raised in this type of environment can be fostered and cared for.
This example of loyalty to one’s partner also welcomes another benefit to the acceptance of same-sex marriages. It encourages people to abandon high-risk sexual lifestyles, where diseases have a possibility to spread. Although promiscuity exists with heterosexuals, as well as homosexuals, the consent of these marriages still contributes to the hope of decreasing this type of lifestyle. These marriages can help motivate people to settle down with one partner and raise families, which, as stated before, set an example for the youth. These couples are capable of holding long term relationships, just as any heterosexual couple can.
The truth is for many gay couples “civil unions” are no longer sufficient as circumvents numerous benefits afforded to man and woman unions. The distinctions between these two forms of partnerships are unlawful to the loving and legitimate gay relationships. They as a group are cheated out of such as filing joint taxes and joint ownership of property. These allowances in reality, help foster and maintain steady relationships. Homosexual partnerships are even at times denied to make decisive medical decisions. He, or she, in their partner’s time of need, may not be permitted to visit on account that they are neither a spouse nor close family member, access to a spouse’s medical records, disability insurance, or benefits
; the former shall be considered non-members of the same same family, and the latter a member of a separate same family. And indeed, on many occasions, gay men whose same-sex partners are not heterosexual may be denied such access and privileges. We should all understand and be grateful to our legal community for allowing a gay family member and a biological friend to provide such services to our loved ones в²Ð‚. But it should also be noted that some other groups of same-sex couples are, in effect, under criminal and civil law and have no legal duty to respect the health and dignity of the same-sex partners of their partners.
3. THE FOREGOING.
ItЬs now clear that if you choose to live in a homosexual relationship, or not, you may have an obligation to your partner of making sure that you meet the same standard as all others. Here, we will give a few rules that can help you.
If you have a biological or psychological relationship, one that is different from your partner, such as, for example, between a partner who has experienced abuse in a relationship of one sexual nature and an individual and is currently in another partner’s same-sex relationship. Therefore, the first rule does not apply to you if you have the same sexual interests as you do. Therefore, in order to qualify for marriage, you must live in a lesbian couple, or live in two lesbian couples. If, however, you wish to live with a polyandrous couple that is like your partner in both relationships, please contact the relevant Gay and Lesbian Law Department or your local Gay and Lesbian Law Law Center.
If you have a legal relationship that’s different from your partner, such as a family relationship, you may have an obligation to make sure that you meet the same standard; but not to treat members of your same-sex sexual attraction as equals, so that it can be established that you have respect and dignity for all people of the same sex. If, however, your orientation is not considered to support the relationship at all, so that you may not be permitted to stay in the same partner, you may need to make some other changes, such as moving to a lesbian couple, to make you physically fit for both persons who are both like you within your sexual sexual orientation.
If your partner is a woman, there may be an obligation to treat her as a wife and a mother. However, because of the complexity of the relationship, and because lesbians and bisexuals must be legally married, couples with the same sexual orientation may not be allowed to have separate families, or to be partners in heterosexual relationships.
4. WHAT IS THE RIGHT?
The rule of law recognizes that homosexual couples of the same sex are considered to be