Robert E LeeEssay Preview: Robert E LeeReport this essayAbstractThis paper theorizes the prevailing social environment that each character lives in leads to their transition from being resolute to irresolute individuals determined to make beneficial or detrimental changes in their lives. The author points out, in one of the five literary works, that in “The Bluest Eye,” Morrison creates the character of Pecola Breedlove, a black American in 1940s American society, in whom the readers can see her internal conflict, torn between accepting being a black American and aspiring to become a white American, hence her preoccupation to have the “bluest eye(s)”. The paper relates, in the last of the five works, that Dmitri Gurov in “Lady with the Pet Dog” by Chekhov demonstrates a change in character for the benefit of romantic love when he finally admits to himself, once in his life, he needs a woman who will not only satisfy his physical needs but also his emotional need to understand him and to feel for him as a man and partner in life.
From the Paper:“Literary works have become significant artifacts for readers because of the similarities and almost-real depictions of the lives of its characters in a particular period and event in human history. Analyses of literary works include, among others, looking into transitions or changes that occurred within a characters personality or behavior throughout the story. This conscious effort to illustrate changes in characterization is vital to the development of the story, since literary works ultimately mirror the reality that it is through human acts that humanitys fate changes over time. That is, an individuals interaction with his/her society inevitably leads to a change in his behavior, and vice versa.”
”
I think the use of literary works in the late nineteenth or early twentieth centuries was due in part to the rise of the American literary scene. In those days, American literature provided a more expansive and nuanced picture of the lives of different types of people, characters and locations. More than that, they were also often the product of the social and cultural processes that affected the lives of authors in those period.„
‟
In short, what we see today has to do with these modern literary and philosophical changes in American literature.„
†
‡
•
‣
․
‥
…
&”‧
#8233;
₳
₴
₵
While an essayist like me has some respect for literary works’ ability to explore the world, my main priority is to show that they do not truly illuminate the world that surrounds us when it is in reality our own. I agree with my colleagues that the work of writers is, without a doubt, the world’s largest and most important source of information to mankind.
₵
Our approach to modern American literature is not to simply look into what people wrote or read and say, but to consider the lives that gave them the power to accomplish these effects. For example, consider the early nineteenth century.₶
₶
₶
‵
₶
₶
₸
₺
₺
&