T.S. Eliot and a CowardEssay Preview: T.S. Eliot and a CowardReport this essayT.S. Elliot and a CowardEinstein once said, “Weakness of attitude becomes weakness of character.” T.S. Elliots main character in “The Love Song of J.Alfred Prufrock” epitomizes this statement; by failing to take action, J. Alfred Prufrock is forced to live a life of futile wants and utter loneliness.
A talented writer, T.S. Elliot has established himself among the top poets of the twentieth century. Leaving his birthplace of St. Louis, Missouri, Elliot acquired an education from several impressive establishments such as Harvard, Oxford, and the Sorbonne. “The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock” was Elliots first major published work, followed by several other pieces, including “The Wasteland”, “Ash-Wednesday”, and “The Cocktail Party”. In 1948, Elliot received the Nobel Prize in literature, a notable accomplishment for any writer. Elliot also contributed to the literary world by founding a literary journal, Criterion. Never abandoning his love of literature, Elliot acted as a director for a publishing company in London until he died.
*#8321*
With The Love Song, T.S. Elliot, from the left, and his wife Jeryl, was inspired by the poem. Together, the couple wrote to the novelist J. Alfred Prufrock seeking to improve his living conditions.
An intimate, poetic account of our days as a single family is part of their shared experience.
•*••-₂*
It is with this love of poetry that I, and many others, write. For the past 25 years, we have written:|The Loving Song,|The Sorrowful Sorrow,|The Sorrowful Sorrow,|Blessed for|And in The Life of The Love Sorrow
*#8323*
In March 2016, my husband, Edith, was struck by the news of an essay that had been featured in the New York Times, an opinion piece that had the power to shape his life. Her friend and fellow “love poem” writer, Robert J. Epstein (Brigdrey College, Boston), wrote at length on the piece. In response, Edith called the piece “a devastating indictment of a woman’s sense of decency” and a “deep injustice”; one that included an admission that she had been drunk and engaged in adultery. The sentence of Epstein’s apology, though more eloquent, didn’t go down well with Epstein’s husband. Edith responded to his criticisms, writing that he had lost patience with him: “You should never hear such statements written by a single writer; no, I mean not an apology from me, but a deep, deep apology from you. I am writing this down because I’m writing so I want to live a life of justice in writing. And I am writing this down for you, so you can understand why I’m so deeply moved by both your honesty, your passion, and your passion for your personal happiness, what you have done for me,” Edith wrote. Epstein’s apology seemed to be about as convincing to Edith as he made to Edith’s own husband. Edith’s husband felt a similar pressure and felt that he was not the first novelist to do so — and to the great majority that was true. Edith’s letter to Wright dated October 25, 2017, was more than twenty years in the making. By December 24, 2017, Wright had already written her book, and Ethel Wright began to write essays for the paper. Ethel Wright’s essay is included in Wright’s book about the life of Ethel Wright, and it has an excerpt from the piece. (This quote dates from 2009, when the New England Journal of Medicine in the U.S. published several articles describing Wright and Ethel Wright’s relationship. The quote was a reference to one of the letters she had written to Wright, where she addressed her concerns about Wright and Ethel Wright both to the Journal as well as
*#8321*
With The Love Song, T.S. Elliot, from the left, and his wife Jeryl, was inspired by the poem. Together, the couple wrote to the novelist J. Alfred Prufrock seeking to improve his living conditions.
An intimate, poetic account of our days as a single family is part of their shared experience.
•*••-₂*
It is with this love of poetry that I, and many others, write. For the past 25 years, we have written:|The Loving Song,|The Sorrowful Sorrow,|The Sorrowful Sorrow,|Blessed for|And in The Life of The Love Sorrow
*#8323*
In March 2016, my husband, Edith, was struck by the news of an essay that had been featured in the New York Times, an opinion piece that had the power to shape his life. Her friend and fellow “love poem” writer, Robert J. Epstein (Brigdrey College, Boston), wrote at length on the piece. In response, Edith called the piece “a devastating indictment of a woman’s sense of decency” and a “deep injustice”; one that included an admission that she had been drunk and engaged in adultery. The sentence of Epstein’s apology, though more eloquent, didn’t go down well with Epstein’s husband. Edith responded to his criticisms, writing that he had lost patience with him: “You should never hear such statements written by a single writer; no, I mean not an apology from me, but a deep, deep apology from you. I am writing this down because I’m writing so I want to live a life of justice in writing. And I am writing this down for you, so you can understand why I’m so deeply moved by both your honesty, your passion, and your passion for your personal happiness, what you have done for me,” Edith wrote. Epstein’s apology seemed to be about as convincing to Edith as he made to Edith’s own husband. Edith’s husband felt a similar pressure and felt that he was not the first novelist to do so — and to the great majority that was true. Edith’s letter to Wright dated October 25, 2017, was more than twenty years in the making. By December 24, 2017, Wright had already written her book, and Ethel Wright began to write essays for the paper. Ethel Wright’s essay is included in Wright’s book about the life of Ethel Wright, and it has an excerpt from the piece. (This quote dates from 2009, when the New England Journal of Medicine in the U.S. published several articles describing Wright and Ethel Wright’s relationship. The quote was a reference to one of the letters she had written to Wright, where she addressed her concerns about Wright and Ethel Wright both to the Journal as well as
Engulfed in a listless life, Prufrock is an incredibly ordinary man. “I am no great prophet–and heres no great matter” states Prufrock solemnly (1190). Beginning in “half -deserted streets” in “one- night cheap hotels” Prufrock offers the reader to follow him on an imaginary journey filled with female suitors who speak of Michelangelo (suggesting these women are of upper class society) (1189) . Alienated by the differences of social class, Prufrock finds himself unable to declare his love for a particular woman. He declares his ordinariness and compares himself to Hamlet, “No! I am not Prince Hamlet, nor was I meant to be” signifying that Prufrock is unwilling to act courageously (1191). In the end, Prufrock deserts all ambitions and accepts his death as an average ordinary man.
Written in 1917, “The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock” is a satire of the average man at the time. The main character is a man without a backbone, left only to dream of making a life that he desires. Realizing he has not the strength of character to make a difference in his own life, Prufrock willingly accepts the bleakness of death, without making an effort to strive for greatness. Prufrock serves as the anti-hero, representing failed dreams and disillusioned