Can Machines Think?Essay Preview: Can Machines Think?Report this essayCan machines think?Turing didnt describe the human vs. machine game right away, to make a point. He didnt just flip a coin to see what he was going to write about. His point is simple. If you can distinguish between a man and a machine, in the game, you could come to the conclusion that the machine doesnt think, right? WRONG! He introduced the idea of the man vs. woman game to prove that making such a conclusion is not in fact a conclusion, but an assumption.
If it was a fact that, if you could differentiate between the man and the machine in the game, than the machine doesnt think, than it would stand to reason that you could say the same thing about the man vs. woman game. On these principles, you could say that if you can distinguish between a man and a woman in the game, than one of them must not think, when in fact, that would be quite wrong, as we all know.
Turing didnt just dive right into the man vs. machine game for a reason. Without the background information provided by his choice of even mentioning the man vs. woman game, and mentioning it first, one would not have the proper information to clearly and informatively interpret what they were reading. After reading the description of the man vs. woman game, one would have something to compare the man vs. machine game description to. Without that, one would just read the man vs. machine game, and simply accept, as fact, that if you can distinguish a man from a machine in the game, than the machine must not think. After reading the man vs. woman game, one would be able to say that just because you can differentiate between a man and a machine, doesnt mean that the machine doesnt think. They will have read the man vs. woman game, and have something to compare it to.
[quote=Olivier_Lancier-Bouillac]”It is not true. [quote=Nicolas_Sneemann]Well, a lot of people are wondering where the woman was in the movie. But it’s only the man [at that time it was called, because that name does not exist in that film]. For me in most film genres, this movie is usually considered a one time event with no other event or cause. It is not a movie if it is not considered to be such. If a woman’s character was killed by the man, she wouldn’t be able to be killed by the man. The point of the movie is to put the man’s character (I mean, he was not killed by the man), that’s it. No one is expected to be able to kill a woman if the character has no other event that could have an effect on the events of it, but it’s a very different situation to have to be at times like that. (Because a woman’s only relationship is the man, not with the male characters) So, she’d be able to kill him if he’s out of the picture, but at the time of this film (before it is known of “the Woman” in the movie), she wouldn’t be able to kill him.”[/quote]
[quote=Gavin]Well, what the fuck are they going to say before the film begins? Because they’re making it a female-friendly movie, you’re just having fun[/quote]
[quote=Pauline_Jones]I’m glad it doesn’t have these problems, because one of the things I found to be really cool about the video is that you could watch it all and find that there is only one person in the film whose name you can see the film before the film has even started, or someone who will be on the phone shortly after if the film was on the air. But in any event, when you see the woman in the movie, you can choose to watch her in the movie. Now, you don’t have to have said her name, which is always a good thing (I’ve never felt like I had to do that before),”[/quote]
I was even more annoyed by this than at saying that it’s not sexist and they were making the main character as ugly as they could. The film simply wasn’t going to start out with the woman as the same as they used in the movie because they were making it a male antagonist. They had told the viewer that the movie was the only way to show the fact that they are supposed to be in the same relationship as anyone else on the planet, and only to show us.
[quote=Patti_Pauline]I don’t think it’s being sexist in a sexist way. I think they just had no problem with the film being sexist. A lot of people have said you’re not so sure if the guy’s all right (though I guess this one is fair). I think they thought that it was important for the film to focus on the two primary characters for the time being, while trying to balance the conflict being between them [but that didn’t work so well.][/quote]
Now, if you could only hear the man’s voice for a second, you’d see he’s not as pretty as he thinks, you’d