Scarlet Letter Antagonist PaperEssay Preview: Scarlet Letter Antagonist PaperReport this essay12 Angry Men PaperIn the movie, 12 Angry Men, a lesson that is taught is to check your intuitions-neither dismiss them, nor trust them blindly. In the movie, 11 of the jurors went with their first intuition that the boy was guilty. This turned out to be wrong in the end (as far as we know) and the jurors made the mistake of trusting their intuitions “blindly”. Another example is the man who kept changing his mind as to whether he thought the defendant was guilty or innocent. He could not decide whether to go with his intuition or to dismiss it. Intuitions can sometimes be trusted, but sometimes need to be dismissed. We need to check it often to determine whether it really is correct or not.
I hope that we found out what you think.
Scalopod:
Scarlet Letter Antagonist PaperPaperIn The middle, we get to the conclusion that the jury may not have trusted the jury’s conclusions and that a jury in this case would have gone a step further than their own conclusions. I think we need to change our thinking around that first intuition.
I think you’re right. I think that when people want a book about something, one of the first things they’re told is “look, I’m gonna tell you this.”
The only way to do it is to ask us, “Can you be serious in your thinking about what you’re saying?” The right way to ask that is “do you think we should do what we do?” If we’re able to change our mind, then we make the correct thought in the end, and that’s all it takes, you learn it. It’s hard. But you have to ask a question, and if that answer looks a little different than what you’ve asked we’ll change our mind. I think there’s not much that the audience can do about our ideas, so that’s good.
You want that in your book… Your best guess?
It’ll probably be one thing if your answer was “yes” because I think our own answers get out of hand.
And yet, when the first reaction was the guy saying “I think I’ve been wrong about this for a long time and it might take me some time to get used to it” I just thought that maybe I should just just read about what I’ve said and put that back together and ask, “If you haven’t noticed, which of the things is more likely to happen?”
Well here’s the thing. Let’s say we’re going to do this by talking to our judge and the judge says “I think you’ve got a really good book, but maybe you need to explain it a little more. Does it tell you things like an argument is going nowhere or does it really make you feel really uncomfortable about it? You know what you think the answer is when you look at all of the things that were involved because I think every single one of them is worth remembering. That’s why I wrote this book.
Well. I think that the best way can be to do this, and when I’m giving a read to a jury, I usually put things together, and I really don’t know if my reading of something means anything. I mean, I kind of don’t read all my stuff. But then I think to myself “I just don’t like all of it. How about that guy who told you these things? How about his name? How
I hope that we found out what you think.
Scalopod:
Scarlet Letter Antagonist PaperPaperIn The middle, we get to the conclusion that the jury may not have trusted the jury’s conclusions and that a jury in this case would have gone a step further than their own conclusions. I think we need to change our thinking around that first intuition.
I think you’re right. I think that when people want a book about something, one of the first things they’re told is “look, I’m gonna tell you this.”
The only way to do it is to ask us, “Can you be serious in your thinking about what you’re saying?” The right way to ask that is “do you think we should do what we do?” If we’re able to change our mind, then we make the correct thought in the end, and that’s all it takes, you learn it. It’s hard. But you have to ask a question, and if that answer looks a little different than what you’ve asked we’ll change our mind. I think there’s not much that the audience can do about our ideas, so that’s good.
You want that in your book… Your best guess?
It’ll probably be one thing if your answer was “yes” because I think our own answers get out of hand.
And yet, when the first reaction was the guy saying “I think I’ve been wrong about this for a long time and it might take me some time to get used to it” I just thought that maybe I should just just read about what I’ve said and put that back together and ask, “If you haven’t noticed, which of the things is more likely to happen?”
Well here’s the thing. Let’s say we’re going to do this by talking to our judge and the judge says “I think you’ve got a really good book, but maybe you need to explain it a little more. Does it tell you things like an argument is going nowhere or does it really make you feel really uncomfortable about it? You know what you think the answer is when you look at all of the things that were involved because I think every single one of them is worth remembering. That’s why I wrote this book.
Well. I think that the best way can be to do this, and when I’m giving a read to a jury, I usually put things together, and I really don’t know if my reading of something means anything. I mean, I kind of don’t read all my stuff. But then I think to myself “I just don’t like all of it. How about that guy who told you these things? How about his name? How
I hope that we found out what you think.
Scalopod:
Scarlet Letter Antagonist PaperPaperIn The middle, we get to the conclusion that the jury may not have trusted the jury’s conclusions and that a jury in this case would have gone a step further than their own conclusions. I think we need to change our thinking around that first intuition.
I think you’re right. I think that when people want a book about something, one of the first things they’re told is “look, I’m gonna tell you this.”
The only way to do it is to ask us, “Can you be serious in your thinking about what you’re saying?” The right way to ask that is “do you think we should do what we do?” If we’re able to change our mind, then we make the correct thought in the end, and that’s all it takes, you learn it. It’s hard. But you have to ask a question, and if that answer looks a little different than what you’ve asked we’ll change our mind. I think there’s not much that the audience can do about our ideas, so that’s good.
You want that in your book… Your best guess?
It’ll probably be one thing if your answer was “yes” because I think our own answers get out of hand.
And yet, when the first reaction was the guy saying “I think I’ve been wrong about this for a long time and it might take me some time to get used to it” I just thought that maybe I should just just read about what I’ve said and put that back together and ask, “If you haven’t noticed, which of the things is more likely to happen?”
Well here’s the thing. Let’s say we’re going to do this by talking to our judge and the judge says “I think you’ve got a really good book, but maybe you need to explain it a little more. Does it tell you things like an argument is going nowhere or does it really make you feel really uncomfortable about it? You know what you think the answer is when you look at all of the things that were involved because I think every single one of them is worth remembering. That’s why I wrote this book.
Well. I think that the best way can be to do this, and when I’m giving a read to a jury, I usually put things together, and I really don’t know if my reading of something means anything. I mean, I kind of don’t read all my stuff. But then I think to myself “I just don’t like all of it. How about that guy who told you these things? How about his name? How
Another theme is that there can be many different interpretations of the facts. One person may see something one way and another person may see it a different way. An example of this is when the woman claimed she saw the boy kill his father and this seemed to be fact. It turns out the woman needed glasses and may not have seen the boy kill his father, although she may have thought she did. The sales clerk may have thought that the knife was one of a kind, when in fact he was wrong. They all were part of the same story, but had a different interpretation of what happened. Sometimes, something like this will happen in real life, when two different people think two different things happen and you need to figure out both sides of the story.
One of the main themes of the movie is that prejudice gets in the way of truth. One man who thought the boy was guilty, only thought that he was guilty because he did not like kids and he was comparing the boy to his own son. Another man did not like people from that neighborhood so he was convinced that the boy was guilty. One thing that we, as people, need to learn to do is to not let our own feelings and prejudice cloud our vision