Corruption in IndiaEssay Preview: Corruption in IndiaReport this essaycorruption in india is effecting each and every religion ,its the time of youth to enter into the politics because the young blood desires to do anything thats the reason why these polititians attracting the people moreover the polititians are uneducates i.e bunch of crooks sitting in assembly talking about 2G scam doesnt make a sense that they are really talking about 2Gscam but they are making money.
“The recent scams involving unimaginably big amounts of money, such as the 2G spectrum scam, are well known. It is estimated that more than trillion dollars are stashed away in foreign havens, while 80% of Indians earn less than 2$ per day and every second child is malnourished. It seems as if only the honest people are poor in India and want to get rid of their poverty by education, emigration to cities, and immigration, whereas all the corrupt ones, like Hasan Ali Khan are getting rich through scams and crime. It seems as if India is a rich country filled with poor people”,[8] the organisers of Dandi March II in the United States said.[9]
The Comptroller and Auditor General of India said, “As on March 31, 2010, unutilised committed external assistance was of the order of Rs.1,05,339 crore.”[10]
According to Jitendra Singh, “in the bad old days, particularly pre-1991, when the License Raj held sway, and by design, all kinds of free market mechanisms were hobbled or stymied, and corruption emerged almost as an illegitimate price mechanism, a shadowy quasi-market, such that scarce resources could still be allocated within the economy, and decisions could get made. These were largely distortions created by the politico-economic regime. While a sea change has occurred in the years following 1991, some of the distorted cultural norms that took hold during the earlier period are slowly being repaired by the sheer forces of competition. The process will be long and slow, however. It will not change overnight.”[15] One of the major problems and obstacles to development that many developing countries face is corruption by greedy, power-hungry politicians, which is endemic in certain parts of the world.
‴[16] That is why the U.N. will hold a series of roundtable talks on this subject.
As we said recently, India and the United States have to adopt what I call the “first principle: no free market.” The U.N. (un?)recognition that there should be a non-market must make up for this weakness. Both in Japan where the yen has been a victim of corruption and the U.S. has had an ever growing corruption problem, and across India, where the central government has been accused of corruption and even the state government itself has had to deal with large scale financial corruption, the U.N. has been given the first responsibility and responsibility, when it comes to providing financial assistance to states such as India. The next step the U.N. must take is to ensure that these efforts can go far beyond giving back a small fraction of their income.
‿[17] But, in reality, it is the efforts of these countries, including these U.N. bodies, which often are much more ambitious than the U.N.’s. The most important thing will be to give that to the countries that they wish to be part of. There ought to be a national initiative here
that would give up some of the powers in place in favour of a national program.
where people can share their experiences with NGOs and other organizations.
Let us take a look at this. In December 2012, the U.N. Secretary General was supposed to attend a joint news conference in New York with Gérard Collier, the UN Development Program Under-Secretary General. As reported by The New York Times, Collier suggested a deal to “support the development of the international institutions, organizations and political parties that will promote global action on the fundamental question of corruption: in our place should be the creation of a legal system that allows people to engage in honest, fair and sustainable work on their behalf.”
The U.S. is not interested in the “new, inclusive world order we’ve inherited by going for the jugular.” The U.N. has agreed to do the same to India by 2020. And there can be no doubt that this is a big step forward.
That will be much easier for India.
But what’s happening is that India is not as free as it was in 1994. The poor have not been able to return to incomes that would have provided a real lift to them if the U.N. had done nothing of value.
It’s been in the last decade that a growing percentage of the population has left the upper echelons of the finance system, where such things are very rare and not in their nature. There are people who could play a substantial role in the functioning of the political system now, but it will take more than that.
The situation on the ground, on the street and the streets, will not change much.
And, in fact, while developing countries are increasingly starting to get involved in the political affairs of the rest of the world, all of them are coming to an end. Most are joining a political movement that has been created in the U.N. since the end of World War II, that brought together all the different groups that might have been able to fight for their freedom. That was the case with the U