Terrorism And Subcultural Theory Of Crime
Essay Preview: Terrorism And Subcultural Theory Of Crime
Report this essay
The horror of domestic terrorism is a problem all Americans should be concerned with, especially since there is a violent subculture in this nation which seeks out and indoctrinates people into their way of life. The crime that I will be focusing on during the course of this paper will be domestic terrorism, specifically hate groups such as the KKK, and various other white supremacy groups. The theory that I will be using to try and explain these crimes will be subcultural theory, but more especially the Subculture of Violence theory provided to us by Marvin Wolfgang and Franco Ferracutti. The reason I will be using his specific subcultural theory is because I feel that it bests describes how the people in these situations are desensitized to the evils they do and then begin to believe that the acts and beliefs are normal, or superior to all other views.
The issue of domestic terrorism has been a fairly recent phenomenon. With little attention given until such acts as the Oklahoma City Bombing and the Unabomber made national headlines. It is because of this that there has been little research done on the area and most of the research there is focuses on the hate groups associated with the acts of violence. A strong force in the domestic terrorist movement is the fervent anti-government stance that these groups internalize. As Mark Hamm wrote in 1997, “I used the term apocalyptic violence to depict not only the astounding carnage witnessed on that day, but also to describe the anti-government counter-culture to which Timothy McVeigh and his accomplices belonged. In this statement he is referring to the assault on the Branch Davidian complex in Waco, TX. It is believed by many that this is the act which pushed McVeigh to bomb the federal building in Oklahoma City. Hamm went on further to argue, “The federal government had created an apocalyptic subculture in the hinterlands of the USA. And that it had done so through its ruthless use-of-force at Waco.”
It is the belief of these groups, most specifically the white supremacy groups that the government is corrupt and run by inferior people, anyone not Anglo-Saxon white, and the country needs to be cleansed. The issue of hate groups has been plaguing this country for many decades but only in recent years have they begun to organize to the tune of committing massive acts of violence and terror. It could be argued that we face a greater risk from these domestic terrorist than that of the foreign terrorists because we can not identify who among us is libel to be a member of these groups. Timothy McVeigh was a prime example of the difficulty in identifying potential wackos; he was a decorated Gulf War I veteran and seemed to be the all-American boy.
These hate groups, like the KKK, Aryan Republican Army, and the Phineas Priesthood, have become very sophisticated in how they recruit and indoctrinate young impressionable people. There is also the push from these groups to recruit military personnel as stated in an essay written by a Lieutenant Commander in the U.S. Navy,
“Right-wing extremists and hate-motivated groups have historically, and are currently recruiting active duty military personnel for several reasons, including: 1) they lend a degree of “legitimacy” and “bravado” to militant groups that aids in the groups ability to recruit civilians, 2) they are trained and are capable of training group members in the use of weapons and tactics, 3) they are useful as an “inside” point of contact for ordinance and munitions thefts, and 4) the military environment fosters a more disciplined and conservative mindset that these groups can exploit and construe to attain loyalties and devotion based upon the racial or religious convictions of the soldier” (Presley 1996).
Wolfgang and Ferracutis Subculture of Violence theory is a theory that gets right to the point and presents its views very clearly to the reader. This theory focuses on subcultures of society and how their members are socialized. “They argued that after being exposed to such an environment, community residents become desensitized to the vicious nature of crime and violence that proliferate in these areas” (Anderson 162). When the members of these subcultures begin to internalize these violent behaviors they become socialized into believing that the violent acts are normal and even acceptable behavior. They choose to cast off the conventional norms of society and put their own set of beliefs in place of those. An important area of their research was in the consideration of those that did not grow up in these violent subcultures. They were considered more pathological than those who were reared in the violent environment.
It is this aspect of the theory that lends itself to the terrorism issue at hand, the majority of people in the white supremacy movements were not raised in that environment. They were seduced by the charismatic hate-mongers that they came into contact with. There are many ways in which people are indoctrinated into their particular