Essay About Master’S Degree And Time Span

Different German Universities in 1999
LOCATION Different German universities in 1999ASSESSMENT OF THE ARTICLEproblem statement-problem was not clearly visible to the average reader-it required several readings to establish why the researchers felt this study needed to be done. -It was limited to the researchers’ capabilities and resources.related research and literature review-The author cited clear review of literature. -provides related literatures that relevant and sufficient to the study.-there are connection between the present study and the previous research and theory- coinciding with the present study to examine multiple indirect Big Five influences via serial mediation mechanisms in a longitudinal design- contributed to the overall understanding of the subject and to the reasoning for establishing the problem statement.objective-the study more specific and parellel to objective-The author’s objectives were answerable by testing null hypotheses. -hypotheses were testable and served to help explain the problem. -hypotheses clearly flow from the problem statement. procedures-properly adapted to the kind of study proposed-it is coinciding with the main objective of this research-procedures described well enough to allow replication of the study. population and sample-The population of interest defined and  used was adequate. -the study focused on master’s degree in science-so it cannot be generalize to other field of master s degree students.  -it cannot be simply generalized for students with other domains.design-contributing to a more complex -a more process-oriented understanding of their influence of individual differences on career outcomes within unselected samples of profesional-Crystal-clear independent and dependent variables-Design plans took into an account of all hypotheses l.-time span of 4 years where this is an advantage to have measured personality and the motivational variables at different times data and instrument-methods used to gather the data for this article were clearly explained. -The instruments adequately described-The instruments and development were explained clearly, – the reliability coefficients of all possible tests were given.-descriptive statistic used appropriate for summarizing the data. -the statistic been interpreted appropriately for the level of measurement of the data. -Operational definitions used to given for all crucial terms in the hypothesesanalysis-clearly summarized what he found in his analysis.   -Results support a process-oriented approach to the influence of personality on career outcomes-The author is justified in the conclusions that he makes based on the study he conducted. -The findings were well organized, sectioned, and reported objectively. -The tables were well organized but, due to the difficulty of the statistical tests employed, would not stand alone to the average reader.-Fully understand of the limitation in their study