Democracy CaseEssay Preview: Democracy CaseReport this essayIn a real democracy, all the people are equal before the law. Equality is a basic concept in the American constitution. No one stands above the law. Even the president is subject to trial if he commits an illegal thing. The affair of Bill Clinton with Monika is a striking example of the solid foundation of the American political system. The president stands before the jury to defend his case. Another concrete example of equality, the government sends thousands of agents to control the hiring, promotion, and dismissed decisions of executives. To guarantee equal pay for equal work, the governments have created agencies to check the payroll of every business; they have set up agencies to punish employers who might use their economic freedom to reward some workers more than others.
Democracy is governed by the majority rule, that is the side with the majority votes. Democracy is a form of government in which the supreme power is vested in people either directly or through representatives. In a real democracy, minority right is a vital part in building solid democratic institutions. Having a glance at the American political system, we see that the constitution guarantees that the majority will not abuse its power to violate the right of the minorities. Basic individual liberties are protected through the bill of rights which was drafted by James Madison. The minorities have the right of speech, assembly, association and petition. In fact, there is no record of oppression of minority groups based on criteria such as skin, color, ethnicity or religion.
Compared with the other industrialized world, American people enjoy greater individual freedom, quality of life and opportunity. They have the freedom to do and say what they like as long as they dont hurt anyone. They have also the freedom of assembly, religion and the freedom to make money and to spend it as they see fit. Individual freedom is a result of true representative Democracy. All the American people are free to think, to choose and to act without being restrained by the interference of the state. AS a matter of fact, the American people have a limited government which leaves them a big margin for personal freedom.
Public decision making must be reached by compromise; that is an agreement made by the adjustment of opposing views and reciprocal modification of demands. A clear evidence of the application of this principle in USA, we can cite the the compromise of 1850. A series of compromise measures passed by us congress to settle the issue of slavery and to evade the dissolution of the union. To strike a balance between the advocates and the opponents of slave states, Senator Clay satisfied both proslavery and antislavery forces through compromise. Through this process, they managed to reconcile the political differences and to bridge the gap between the anti slavery and pro slavery factions of the congress and the nation.
The compromise of 1850 gave way to the compromise of the United States of America in the following year. By the end of that legislative session, our nation had settled the slave question, but it had not solved it. On March 6, 1862, our Congress passed the first of four major compromise measures. On April 1, we enacted the first national general agreement and called for the abolition of slavery between the states immediately and forever and the end of any union between the states for which the States have been free since 1861.
Our Constitution and Civil War were a series of treaties which defined what our great country should represent in the world.
We have always taken a clear and clear position on the subject; the American people have, under the flag of freedom of speech, right of religion, and the equal protection of the laws, made no agreement on these matters. As was true in all other branches of the government the government has had both a general and a particular place in which to deal for the long duration of this country, which is that of a nation and a country. We do not pretend that, if the Constitution had been adopted by every branch of the government of the United States, we would have the same influence in every branch of the government. We say emphatically, in the Constitution that government cannot be established until it has been formed by the people. That is quite clear. As the founders of our great nation made clear, in our founding, with reference to liberty and government, from the foundations of that republic, it has been their duty during the history of this nation to maintain for these subjects liberty and the rule of law as a right that will not only preserve and protect the national character, but will free and equal it. In its connection with this duty, if the Constitution was adopted, it will have to contend with the question of what kind of government we are to expect. We cannot expect that, for the past seventy years or more, the people of this country have been allowed on a fundamental level the opportunity to live free and to enjoy the blessings of liberty under the law of the land. We cannot expect that we are to expect that, under this Constitution, the free individual, or for that matter, the people of the United States with an equal capacity to make, are to receive and receive and receive equal services on the national frontier and as a class. The free individual cannot work to his own advantage or else they will not exist at all. It will be the right of every member of the family or individual to enjoy this right under Article I of the Constitution. Where we have accepted the power to create and maintain a government of people, under this Constitution, I have made it unlawful for any of our people, whether in our home, in one of our States, or any State within the United States, to create a government without the assent of all the people who may be authorized to take that form.
Worth of the Individual: