Cheesburger Law
Join now to read essay Cheesburger Law
The official name for the “Cheeseburger Bill,” is H.R. 339, the “Personal Responsibility in Food Consumption Act.” On March 10, 2004 the bill was passed by the majority or 276 representatives voting for the bill. 139 representatives voted against it.
The law is constitutional because it does not go against anything written in the Constitution. It seems that the only way to decide this case would be by statutes. Whatever a person eats to harm their own body is not the food providers fault. The consumer should be responsible enough to understand if the food they are eating healthy or not. If the law wasnt passed it would just give consumers a way to get money to eat fast food.
At this point, it seems as if Illinois and Pennsylvania have not passed a bill similar to the “Cheeseburger Bill.” According to some highly accredited news agencies, Illinois and Pennsylvania are currently considering putting such a bill in place to cover them from such lawsuits.
Ashley Pelman v. McDonalds Corp. is a case in which Ashley Pelman is suing McDonalds Corp. for failing to disclose clearly but rather conspicuously the health effects of eating McDonalds food. The plaintiff further argued that McDonalds should be held responsible for