Immigration CaseEssay Preview: Immigration CaseReport this essayThe media reaction to immigration problem in the United Sates is as diverse ad the cultures and peoples it impacts. While there does exist some common public and political views there is also facts information which could alter those positions. The media piece, discussed here, found on YouTube under the title AP Gov. Immigration 2011, posted by dmcb324, a variety of media clips providing information from numerous news sources both local and international are given. This paper will use this media format to address the questions on the media reaction toward immigration.
What is the historical framework of this issue?The framework presented in this media presentation covers a current and present time frame beginning with the elections of 2010 through the months of 2011. So the information seen and heard is very up-to-date and thereby relevant in todays societal issues.
What is the political context of this issue?The piece presents all sides of the political spectrum. It utilizes news clips and media information from both liberals and conservatives and well as members of the Democratic and Republican parties. This unique combining of views and information provides for a very thought-provoking and unbiased look at some of the issues around immigration today. By presenting only the information, alongside the human elemnts impacted without slanting it does not lead the viewer to any conclusion and presents hwo truly complicated the issue is.
What message does the media piece attempt to convey? Was the media coverage biased or unbiased? Was the issue sensationalized or portrayed objectively? How might the media coverage effect the public perception of the issue? Does encourage or discourage prejudice, discrimination or stereotyping?
The piece attempts to provide perspective which addresses both the concerns and different views of the immigration issue in the United States. The coverage presented here was unbiased and portrayed objectively. Societal issues mentioned by Richard Schaefer in his book, “Racial and Ethnic Groups. Census Update. Twelfth Edition , ” Illegal immigrants and even legal immigrants have become tied by the public to almost every social problem in the nation. They have become scapegoats for unemployment. They are labeled as “drug runners” and especially since September 11,2001 “terrorists”.” are presented for consideration with input from all sides.
Further, just as stated in “Understanding and Managing Diversity Section II” byCarol P. Harvey, “The exploration of the immigration policy and reform is a volatile and complicated issue socially, politically and legally ..” This media presentation reinforces that with it media representation of the “Dream Act,” proposed by the Democratic Congress and opposed by their Republican counterparts.. It further presents arguments of how the undocumented immigrants are drawing benefits from the government and then presents the facts on their contribution to the faltering Social Security Program which they cannot draw from and the taxes which they cannot get refunded. The piece also offers both sides of the economic work issue, that follows that these undocumented immigrants are taking away jobs from American and then provides commentary
Further, in addition to the economic and social work aspect, the article offers interesting policy considerations on migration in light of the recent mass arrests, including in Virginia and Ohio, and on the increasing pressure from the pro- and anti-Trump media (including The Post, the New York Times, and CNN) to engage in a political agenda.The article also offers a discussion of “Who is it That Needs American Jobs?” and a discussion of how the Democratic Party has to build its leadership support, particularly within the mainstream of this particular issue and where the Democratic Party needs to focus.Further, in addition to the political and social work aspect, the article offers interesting policy considerations on migration in light of the recent mass arrests, including in Virginia and Ohio, and on the increasing pressure from the pro- and anti-Trump media (including The Post, the New York Times, and CNN) to engage in a political agenda.• The U-2 film was also included as part of an original presentation on the program below as a follow-up to our previous discussion on the program, “American Dreamers: How They Need America’s Dream,” published on the Media Matters website on May 5, 2012. (There is a link to the original presentation on the program at the link contained below.) On October 11, 2012, President Obama issued Executive Order 13744 (a “national security order”), which, according to this order, “requires that agencies of the United States not receive the funds appropriated or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014. • An additional $1 billion should be obligated for the new program by year-end, and $2 billion by 2020, to meet the additional funding requirements imposed by this Order.” An additional $1 billion or $2 billion should be obligated in total by the end of FY 2015. • For the 2017 budget year, the increase in the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) and section 1235(d)(5) of the Act apply to U-2 activities. Section 1235(d)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act provides that in addition to the amounts set forth by the Administrator (through appropriations bills), appropriations for such programs under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) will be made available under the authority of sections 15(f) and 15(g) of the Act for all fiscal years; (but only for such programs as authorize the administration and agencies of the United States to receive and make available funds; and (only for such program as do authorized appropriations). The Immigration and Nationality Act also authorizes appropriations for such programs through December 31, 2015 in the amount requested, and includes the estimated number by which the amounts are appropriated from each such fiscal year to reimburse for any costs incurred for U-2 training and supplies, and for administrative costs and other obligations associated with the procurement and operation of such programs.The President’s order also directs the Department of Defense to notify Congress of program budget priorities for fiscal years 2014 through 2017. These programs should include the following:• The cost-sharing reduction that Congress recommends as an ongoing requirement in the first budget year under part H of title 12, United States Code ; and• Programs implementing programs that provide, or require the use of, the Department of Justice for the purpose of combating the transfer and threat of aliens from the United States to other countries and countries beyond the border of a recipient country and to detain individuals suspected of aiding, abetting or embezzling the Government of any foreign country or