Alternative Dispute ResolutionEssay Preview: Alternative Dispute ResolutionReport this essayAlternative dispute resolution (ADR) represents a variety of processes through which potential litigants may resolve disputes.Potential Uses of ADRMany disputes involve people who have known each other for some time, like neighbors, relatives, acquaintances, co-workers, or friends. In addition, selected felonies may be referred to dispute resolution or mediation centers with the approval of the court, and the consent of the people (prosecutor), the victim (complainant) and the respondent (defendant). Mediation is not an option, however, in cases of domestic violence, child abuse, or other serious and complex issues.
Practical uses of ADRPresents a variety of approaches to resolving differences that affect all kinds of disputes. Some focus on using the ADR as a tool for resolving complex matters in a complex legal context, in contrast to litigation that is simply taking place at the individual, public site where we were assigned. This document attempts to address these important issues in a non-traditional form.It is important that readers understand that while we are here to offer a detailed explanation of the various aspects of dispute resolution across legal settings, it is also important that everyone is familiar with how it works, using the ADR as a very common and powerful tool for resolving disputes. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the various strategies that may be utilized for resolving multiple or multiple types of disputes, or for resolving a complex issue in a single way.
Concluding remarks, we would like to stress the importance that we take into account a very small number of common problems during adjudication and that people do not only encounter conflict, but also that these solutions are difficult and do not have the necessary understanding of the legal situation (see “An Overview of ADR Cases”). We believe that the more detailed their research and work, the more effective their approaches are in dealing with them.
Advantages of using ADR:Save Time: A dispute often can be settled or decided much sooner with ADR; often in a matter of months, even weeks, while bringing a lawsuit to trial can take a year or more.
Save Money: When cases are resolved earlier through ADR, the parties may save some of the money they would have spent on attorney fees, court costs, and experts fees.
Increase Control over the Process and the Outcome: In ADR, parties typically play a greater role in shaping both the process and its outcome. In most ADR processes, parties have more opportunity to tell their side of the story than they do at trial. Some ADR processes, such as mediation, allow the parties to fashion creative resolutions that are not available in a trial. Other ADR processes, such as arbitration, allow the parties to choose an expert in a particular field to decide the dispute.
Preserve Relationships: ADR can be a less adversarial and hostile way to resolve a dispute. For example, an experienced mediator can help the parties effectively communicate their needs and point of view to the other side. This can be an important advantage where the parties have a relationship to preserve.
Increase Satisfaction: In a trial, there is typically a winner and a loser. The loser is not likely to be happy, and even the winner may not be completely satisfied with the outcome. ADR can help the parties find win-win solutions and achieve their real goals. This, along with all of ADRs other potential advantages, may increase the parties overall satisfaction with both the dispute resolution process and the outcome.
Improve Attorney-Client Relationships: Attorneys may also benefit from ADR by being seen as problem-solvers rather than combatants. Quick, cost-effective, and satisfying resolutions are likely to produce happier clients and thus generate repeat business from clients and referrals of their friends and associates.
What Are the ADR Options?The most commonly used ADR processes are mediation, arbitration, neutral evaluation, and settlement conferences.Mediation: in mediation, an impartial person called a “mediator” helps the parties try to reach a mutually acceptable resolution of the dispute. The mediator does not decide the dispute but helps the parties communicate so they can try to settle the dispute themselves. Mediation leaves control of the outcome with the parties.
Cases for Which Mediation May Be Appropriate: Mediation may be particularly useful when parties have a relationship they want to preserve. So when family members, neighbors, or business partners have a dispute, mediation may be the ADR process to use. Mediation is also effective when emotions are getting in the way of resolution. An effective mediator can hear the parties out and help them communicate with each other in an effective and nondestructive manner.
Cases for Which Mediation May Not Be Appropriate: Mediation may not be effective if one of the parties is unwilling to cooperate or compromise. Mediation also may not be effective if one of the parties has a significant advantage in power over the other. Therefore, it may not be a good choice if the parties have a history of abuse or victimization.
Arbitration: in arbitration, a neutral person called an “arbitrator” hears arguments and evidence from each side and then decides the outcome of the dispute. Arbitration is less formal than a trial, and the rules of evidence are often relaxed.
Arbitration may be either “binding”