Socratic Ignorance – Essay – choconative
Search
Essays
Sign up
Sign in
Contact us
Tweet
Index
/Philosophy
Socratic Ignorance
Socratic IgnoranceAccording to Socrates, all wrong, or evil, is due to ignorance. He claims there is no actual intention to commit evil acts and that one does not simply choose to dwell in wrongdoing when they are aware that it is wrong. While I might agree that some acts of evil can be due to ignorance, I do not agree that all acts of evil are left to be only explained by ignorance. It is in our human nature to periodically act in ways that are apparently evil. Socrates believes that every human action is out of self-interest. He argues that one will choose to act in a way that will be highly beneficial and or make them feel good. But, what about moral weakness? Socrates eventually recognizes and acknowledges moral weakness as a type of ignorance. If ignorance to Socrates is defined as the lack of knowledge, and moral weakness is knowing that something is bad yet choosing to partake in it anyways, then moral weakness is not ignorance because one attains the knowledge of the consequence of his/her action.If someone was mistakenly given more money than they should have been given, it would be in their best interest to keep it. This is an example of acting immoral. People, out of self-interest, are noted to act immoral which then denies the concept that nobody does wrong knowingly. Socrates believes that living a virtuous life grants ultimate happiness and inner-peace. Living an unjust and immoral life grants the opposite. You are actually harming yourself and preventing happiness to enter your life by acting immoral or harming others. If ignorance leads to wrongdoing, and wrongdoing leads to an unhappy life, how is it possible to possess happiness for one who does not possess knowledge of what is good and bad due to mental illness, the nature in which he or she was raised, or flawed education?
Any of a broad range of medical conditions that are marked primarily by sufficient disorganization of personality, mind, or emotions to impair normal psychological functioning and cause marked distress or disability and that are typically associated with a disruption in normal thinking, feeling, mood, behavior, interpersonal interactions, or daily functioning is known as mental illness (Merriam-Webster, 2016). Notice that psychological functioning is impaired, and in some mental illnesses the ability to acquire knowledge. If one with mental illness cannot comprehend what is right and wrong, is it our place to decide whether or not their life is virtuous if they cannot possess the same knowledge as someone without mental illness? If him/her was born with and did not purposely attain mental illness, then Socrates argument is invalid because in mental illness the mind is disrupted and impaired. Socrates is certain that ignorance is the root of all wrongdoing. Yet in law, charges against someone with a severe mental illness are usually, almost always, dropped. Are these crimes committed due to ignorance? Well, was there lack of knowledge during the course of action? Yes. Does this person have the capability to possess the knowledge needed to decipher right from wrong? No. Is this defined as ignorance if it is not humanly and scientifically possible for one to attain this knowledge?Misguidance and failed upbringing may also play an important role in immorality and explaining poorly made decisions. Many murderers, stealers, and likewise grew up in an environment where right was taught to be wrong and wrong was taught to be right. Or their childhood environment consisted of unsafe surroundings, and their violent actions now are the result of the violent actions they witnessed then or the protest of the actions that he/she was the victim of. One may know good from evil but still choose to dwell in wrongdoing despite their knowledge. Moral education is vital although being morally educated does not prevent you from doing evil works.
Continue for 2 more pages »
Read full document
Download as (for upgraded members)
Citation Generator
MLA 7
CHICAGO
(2018, 02). Socratic Ignorance. EssaysForStudent.com. Retrieved 02, 2018, from
“Socratic Ignorance” EssaysForStudent.com. 02 2018. 2018. 02 2018 <
"Socratic Ignorance." EssaysForStudent.com. EssaysForStudent.com, 02 2018. Web. 02 2018. <
"Socratic Ignorance." EssaysForStudent.com. 02, 2018. Accessed 02, 2018.
Essay Preview
By: choconative
Submitted: February 9, 2018
Essay Length: 740 Words / 3 Pages
Paper type: Essay Views: 602
Report this essay
Tweet
Related Essays
The Mind: Aristotle Kant and Socrates
Daniel C. Dennet said in A Glorious Accident that, "our minds--if you like-- [are] just as real as our dreams"(Kayzer, 37). The implications of this
2,327 Words  |  10 Pages
Philosophies of Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle
Philosophies of Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle The philosophies of Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle had different points of-view but they were also similar in some ways.
425 Words  |  2 Pages
In Expanding the Field of Knowledge We but Increase the Horizon of Ignorance" (henry Miller) Is This True?
What can you walk towards forever and never reach? The answer is simple: the horizon. The use of the horizon as a metaphor for knowledge
1,616 Words  |  7 Pages
The Sheep, the Inept Inexpert and the Inspired Ignorant
Computer technicians working at a call center have to deal with many types of people. Have you every wondered what kind callers technical support people
499 Words  |  2 Pages
Similar Topics
Socrates Philosophy Good Life
Antigone Vs Socrates Crito
Get Access to 89,000+ Essays and Term Papers
Join 209,000+ Other Students
High Quality Essays and Documents
Sign up
© 2008–2020 EssaysForStudent.comFree Essays, Book Reports, Term Papers and Research Papers
Essays
Sign up
Sign in
Contact us
Site Map
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Facebook
Twitter