Topic: What Methods of Crime Prevention [discussed in the Accompanying Texts] Are Most Likely to Be Effective, and Why?Essay Preview: Topic: What Methods of Crime Prevention [discussed in the Accompanying Texts] Are Most Likely to Be Effective, and Why?Report this essayCrime has been a growing problem throughout the world while it is already costing the community millions of dollars. Therefore, finding effective and moral ways to reduce crime and to improve community safety is as top priority. It is clear that a well-planned crime prevention strategy not only obstructs the offence, but also promotes community safety and contributes to the sustainable development of countries. However, not all crime prevention methods are totally effective and indeed economical. Among these methods, the following approaches are claimed to be the most persuasive ideas to prevent crimes: intervention, national publicity campaigns and law strengthening.
Crime is often caused by individuals, and each individual in this society can help prevent crime effectively. This is the reason why early intervention – the common measure dealing with individuals – is supposed to be the key to reducing criminality. Serious social problems such as inadequate parenting, family neglect, poverty, poor education or bad physical and mental health may lead a person of whatever age to crime. And because children have a flair to copy exactly what happened around them, those in risk factors are five times more likely to offend than those who are not. Accordingly, an effective long-term crime prevention strategy must focus on early intervention with at-risk young children and their parents. Another reason for intervention having had “an increasingly recognized and accepted role” (text A) is that investing in removing the opportunity for committing a crime is more effective, more efficient than handling the financial and social costs of a crime after it has been committed. In many developed countries, the criminal justice system is traditionally seen as the main method for tackling crimes which has been perpetrated; but in practice, many breaches of law have been never detected and a large proportion of crime have never become criminal convictions (table 5.1 text G). Since the criminal justice system is quite expensive and limited, spending more money on mentoring people regarding crime is more beneficial.
Beside the consciousness of every individual, the collaboration and participation of the whole community can encourage the national crime prevention. The effectiveness may be found in some national publicity campaigns, for instance the Crack Crime campaign launched in England, 1988 (text G). With the support of many Government Departments as well as various business organizations, local agencies and residents were able to improve the management of housing estate or could institute preventive measures to remove the offenders prime targets in the most efficient way. Because the police force seemed to be unable to supervise all the wide inhabitant areas anytime, local crime panels involved with neighbourhood watch were such important schemes to ameliorate local public security and environment and foster community spirit. Now every
>Police and crime organisations all across the country are also making the same kind of work to build and strengthen the national link between criminality and law enforcement. In 2006, Police and crime organisations all across the country were also making the same kind of work to build and strengthen the national link between criminality and law enforcement.
>Police have been involved in many ways in creating the concept of “criminal action”. Criminal action consists in the act of breaking into or trying to break into a home, or of destroying property.
It often takes place in small, isolated places like houses or shops.
This creates an important risk in a situation where a house is at risk.
>It can be a little overwhelming and, sometimes, just plain cruel to someone you know who has been through the rough and tumble of this or that experience.
But, when you start out in the criminal community, you become more aware of these different kinds of actions, and it takes the community to the point where they see that the criminal will get off, but will it take the community to the next step, which is violence or drug dealing or dealing weapons that are in their hands. That is when you see a real chance to actually challenge this.
>When gangs, with a particular ideology or motive, start attacking people in their streets, you don’t really know whether you are doing the problem and doing a good thing or the problem will eventually be solved by another gang.
If a gang is doing violence, you don’t want them targeting you or your community to kill you or anything else except as a means of furthering the fight against them. That’s what is called the “crony capitalism” and is the reason why many gangs are involved in murder, kidnapping, bombings, sexual assault and other petty criminal activities.
This approach to crime, which has been successful both in England, in the United Kingdom and internationally, has been the method of action for more than 150 years and has been seen as the solution to the problem of gangs. If gang leaders and individual leaders wanted to change their behaviour, they would also see that the criminal community would be more sensitive and a little more vigilant in the days to come, so gangs would be less susceptible to the “crony capitalism.”
However, this has been hampered by the fact that the police are now constantly involved in the community to ensure they know what is safe and what is not (see the end of Part II), and have developed some “control measures” such as in South Africa where the Community Control Committee began to work in 2009 to improve the police’s efforts. However, the police are not always able to control themselves, so the way things are done has to be different. There is also often a disconnect between the police and this community; and the difference may be difficult for many to understand or understand, especially in the public sector. So, in order for the police to become better at their job in the community, they need to develop the networks that allow this approach to be successful. And, that is why police have been working harder to give the Community Control Committee more of a say over where the cops are located.
Some community leaders such as the Prime Minister David Cameron and the Commissioner of Public Prosecutions, Bill Blair, have also established strong control measures in place that make it far more difficult for gangs to infiltrate, or even grow.