Gays in Military
Essay title: Gays in Military
Homosexuals have been excluded from our society since our countrys beginning, giving them no equal protection underneath the large branch of the law. The Emancipation Proclamation gave freedom to blacks from slavery in the 1800s and women were given the freedoms reserved for males in the early 1900s with the womens suffrage movement. But everyone still knows the underlying feeling of nation in dealing with minorities and women, one of contempt and utter disgust. Hate crimes are still perpetrated to this day in this country, and most are unpublicized and “swept underneath the rug.” The general public is just now dealing with the struggle of Homosexuals to gain rights in America, although this persecution is subtle, quiet and rarely ever seen to the naked eye or the general public.
The big question today in Homosexuals rights struggles are dealing with the right to be a part of our countrys Military Forces. At the forefront of the struggle to gain access to the military has been Females who have tried to gain access to “All Men” facilities and have been pressured out by other cadets. This small group of women have fought hard, and pressured the Government to change regulations dealing with the inclusion of all people, whether female or male, and giving them all the same opportunities they deserve. The Homosexual struggle with our Nations Armed Forces has been acquiring damage and swift blows for over 60 years now, and now they too are beginning to fight back.
With the public knowledge of “initiation rights” into many elite groups of the military, the general public is beginning to realize how exclusive the military can be. One cadet said after “hell week” in the Marines, “It was almost like joining a fraternity, but the punishments were 1000 times worse than ever imagined, and the Administration did not pretend to turn there back, they were instrumental in the brutality.” The intense pressure of “hell week” in the Marines drove a few to wounding themselves, go AWOL, and a few even took there own life. People who are not “meant to be” in the Military are usually weeded out during these “initiations” and forced either to persevere or be discharged dishonorably. The military in the United States has become an elite society, a society where only few survive.
In a survey taken in 1990, the United States population on a whole is believed to consist of 13-15% Homosexuals. This figure is believed to have a margin of error on the upward swing due to the fact that most homosexuals are still “afraid” of their sexuality and the social taboos it carries along with it. With so many Homosexuals in the United States, how can the military prove its exclusion policy against Homosexuals correct and moral? Through the “long standing tradition and policy,” says one Admiral of the U.S. Navy. But is it fair or correct? That is the question posed on Capitol Hill even today, as politicians battle through a virtual minefield of tradition and equal rights.
Historically, support for ones military was a way to show ones patriotism, if not a pre-requisite for being patriotic at all. Society has given the military a great deal of latitude in running its own affairs, principally due to societys acknowledgment that the military needs such space in order to run effectively. The military, in turn, has adopted policies which, for the most part, have lead to very successful military ventures, which served to continually renew societys faith in the military. Recently, however, that support has been fading. The Vietnam War represented both a cause of diminishing support for the military by society as well a problem. The Vietnam War occurred during a period of large-scale civil disobedience, as well as a time where peace was more popular than war. Since the effectiveness of the military depends a great deal upon societys support, when societys support dropped out of the war effort, the war effort in turn suffered. The ultimate defeat of the United States in the Vietnam War effort only lead to less faith in the militarys ability. This set the stage for society becoming more involved in how the military was run.
The ban on homosexuals serving in the military, was originally instituted in 1942. Though some of the reasons that were used to justify it at the time have been debunked since-that homosexual service members in sensitive positions could be blackmailed, for instance (“Gays and the Military” 54)-the policy was largely an extension of the militarys long-standing policy against homosexual acts. At the time, the prevailing attitude was that homosexuality was a medical/psychiatric condition, and thus the military sought to align itself with this school of thought. Rather than just continuing to punish service