Essay About Mock-Trial Of Napoleon Bonaparte And First Day

During the Mock-Trial of Napoleon Bonaparte
Essay Preview: During the Mock-Trial of Napoleon Bonaparte
Report this essay
During the mock-trial of Napoleon Bonaparte both sides, the defense and the prosecution, looked deeply into what crimes against the state and crimes against the humanities, enlightenment thinking, was and how Napoleon was guilty or not guilty of those crimes. On the first day, the prosecution and the defense took the stand, the witnesses spoke of the unfairness of Napoleons rule and how Napoleon’s rule affected them in particular, not the state as a whole. Day two, of the trial, the witnesses were able to use their own experiences to prove that Napoleon was guilty or innocent, based on how Napoleon affected many people. The combination of the two days lead to a conclusion of whether or not he should be charged guilty or innocent of crimes against the state or the humanities. Napoleon’s rule was resolved. In the end, the verdict that was reached was that Napoleon was found guilty of crimes against the humanities and the state. Freedom of speech is an enlightenment ideal and one that the revolution was fighting for, but the French people were not able to when Napoleon was in power. He had secret police listening to the civilians conversations and controlled the curriculum of the schools. By doing this he infringed upon his subject’s privacy and forced the new age of people to have a filtered education. Also, Napoleon filtered the press. This caused all the news about the world and even his rule was allowed or not allowed to be put in the newspaper by Napoleon. The printing revolution, that took place during the Enlightenment, helped change people’s lives by allowing for news to be spread much faster and without bias, but controlling the press was taking a step backward from that. Another crime that he committed against humanities was rigging the elections so that he would win. If you went to vote and did not vote for Napoleon then your address was written down and you were killed. This idea is one example of what the enlightenment thinkers were trying to stop from happening.