To Believe or Not to Believe, Modern Urban Legends
Essay Preview: To Believe or Not to Believe, Modern Urban Legends
Report this essay
To Believe or Not To Believe
Modern Urban Legends
Many people have heard the tale of the dotty grandmother who tried to dry off her damp poodle by placing it in the microwave oven. The dog exploded, sad to say the least , and Grandma has never been quite the same since. The story is not true; it is an urban legend, circulating by word of mouth since the 1970s (Brunvand, 108). Urban legends are popular stories alleged to be true and transmitted from person to person by oral or written communication. Legends tend to arise spontaneously and are rarely traceable to a single point of origin. They spread primarily from individual to individual through various communication, and only in atypical cases through mass media or other institutional means. Every culture has its folktales, including modern America. However, instead of involving gods and goddesses or princes and princesses, modern societys legends involve “some guy my sisters best friend knows” or “someone who woke up in a motel room.” They happened, supposedly, to real people, usually recently, in a particular place. They touch the most sensitive nerves of human minds with ironic twists, gross-out shocks, and moral lessons learned the hard way. However, the most remarkable thing about these stories is that so many people believe them and pass them on. Why does an audience take the storytellers word at face value, instead of recognizing it as an urban legend? The most obvious reasons as to why this happens are how the story is told to an individual, the relationship between the teller and the listener, and in the case of horror legends, the fear invoked through the moral of the story.
There are many particular elements of an urban legend that play an enormous role in how it is interpreted by the public. They are usually characterized by a combination of humor, horror or a warning. The two types of urban legends are cautionary, usually having a moral to the story or a warning to stay “safe”, and non-cautionary, which have no cautionary or moral element at all (Harris, 1). The details or beef of these legends are the primary factors that make them so believable. A good example is the “Alligators in the Sewer” legend. The setting of this legend is usually a large city, in which a reptile-loving fanatic decides to buy a baby alligator to keep in their cramped apartment as a pet. They soon realize they cannot keep the alligator because it is growing rapidly and in turn, resort to flushing it down the commode. The baby alligator gets sucked through the piping of the building and eventually ends up in the sewer where it survives on eating rats and other garbage (Brown, 127). A person is more likely to believe the tale if the storyteller gives them juicy details of a child they know getting chased by one while playing in the disgusting muck, rather than saying they heard it in a coffee shop down the street. In the case of a non-cautionary legend, someone may believe the story just because it is humorous, and they are completely amazed that such a thing has occurred.
The details of a good urban legend will keep the listener on the edge of his or her seat. “It is human nature to want to spread this feeling to others, and be the one whos got everyone wanting to hear how the story turns out” (Harris, 3). Even if it is a made-up joke, they may want to personalize it by claiming it happened to a friend. Another reason urban legends are so convincing is the thought that the horrendous tale happened to a “friend of a friend.”
The life of an urban legend does rely mostly on the details contained within it to give the story the interest it needs in order to be passed along to someone else, but there is something else that lies underneath the success of the legend. Anyone can brush off a story from a complete stranger, but it is harder to ignore someone who is trusted. Why would they lie? In many cases, this trust runs so deep that a person will insist that an urban legend actually occurred, even when confronted with evidence to the contrary. Most people do not investigate every piece of information they hear. As humans they need to trust people for their own comfort. “Psychologically, we need to trust peopleand if you trust somebody, youll believe almost anything that person tells you” (Harris, 4). Some people find particular urban legends believable because they help to substantiate their personal worldview. Humans are prone to accepting stories that do not directly contradict their personal experiences as being true because they have an underlying need to increase their understanding of the world. In the areas where formal methods of information have been lacking, people rely on informal methods like oral stories to educate them about the world.
Legends are also more likely to be believed if they are heard from an “authoritative source.” (Harris, 4) The reason for this is once again due to a trust between the reader and the source. People generally believe the stories they read in a newspaper or magazine because they trust the credibility. An example that surfaces year after year is the persistence of Halloween stories. There are no documented cases of contamination of candy, but the news and police issue warnings “just in case” (Brunvard, 243).
Other cautionary tales relating to