Essay About Much Power And United States

How Much Power and Liberty Did the Constitution Give to “the People?”Essay title: How Much Power and Liberty Did the Constitution Give to “the People?”How much power and liberty did the constitution give to “the people?”The constitution is the document that has framed and shaped the United States from inception. It is the document that is defended by all new presidents and also the document which affords the citizens of the United States freedoms and rights that cannot be removed. In its drafting it shaped the formation of a new country and a new style of governance. It is a ‘bottom up’ as opposed to established ways of government which are ‘top down’. However for all its virtues the Constitution is somewhat ambiguous and there is some debate of the intent of the drafters, did they intend to give as much power or did they intend to give less power to the people?

The Constitution sets out the system, rules and regulations of how the new American government was to work. The constitution was drafted by a small select group of people from the 13 states; they were the people’s representatives for the constitution. However these people were very much part of an emerging elite, the masses weren’t literate nor would they have had a vast understanding of theories of government, all they knew was the old system and monarchical government. Therefore the drafting of the constitution fell to what one could call idealistic gentry, who were very wealthy and well educated perhaps an upper class group of individuals. They may have been acting on behalf of the people but there are numerous examples of blatant self-interest. When assigning powers to congress taxation was obviously a big area, the representatives from the Southern states managed to get exemptions for export duties. Many of the representatives from these southern states were heavily involved in the Tobacco trade and made a lot of their personal wealth from this trade so it was is in their own direct interest to get exemptions for these things. This is a clear demonstration on how some representatives weren’t wholly representative.

To assess how much power and liberty the constitution gives to the people one obviously must look at the language and the content of the document itself. In article one, section four, it states “The congress shall assemble at least once in every year, and such meeting shall be on the first Monday in December, unless they shall appoint a different day”. The language of this section implies that congress was only intended to meet rarely, any elected chamber that is intended to meet rarely cannot have much legitimacy. It cannot be thought of, as a great democratic institution representing the peoples will.

At the time of drafting the constitution, the rules on the senate were to be two senators for each state, which were appointed by the state legislatures, rather than directly elected by the people. “The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two senators from each state, chosen by the legislature thereof”. This is somewhat of an oxymoron for a country that states ‘we hold these truths to be self-evident. That all men are created equal’. The power in the Senate does not lie with the people, but of the people they elected for their State legislatures. There is no direct link here between the people and congress, the power is appointed rather like the house of Lords in the mother country, which was meant to be a bridge between the monarch and the house of commons, if you will a middle ground between two opposing factions. The way the Senate was comprised is of a political appointee system, which inevitably favours the wealthy and influential elite’s. It is the power of the people by proxy, which is hardly democratic.

The Congress had the discretion whether to publish its proceedings, so if they so chose the public who put them there could never know what they are doing on their behalf.

The system laid out in the constitution for electing the President is symbolic of the distrust of the people by the representatives at the constitutional convention. The Electoral College system was devised as a ‘half-way’ house between the people directly electing the president and the president being appointed. The Electoral College is devised as to proportion the votes to the population of the states. So the number of electors for each state is the number of house representatives and senators combined. Therefore New York currently has 31 House representatives and 2 senators, so it has 33 electors for the Electoral College. When Americans are voting for a President they are actually voting for a board of electors who then vote for the president. But these electors don’t have to follow what the majority of people in that state voted for; they can if they so wish vote for another candidate. This has happened on some occasions in the 1948 presidential election one of Tennessee’s electors voted for

e.g., the Republican nominee for President. But in the case of the Senate and the House, the electors in those states vote jointly and that means that it doesn’t have to be that one elector who is majority for the Congress because of that other elector who is a minority. And in the case of a congressional election when only an elector is allowed to vote for the Congress (if both of those elector are electors), the other elector can vote for a third party candidate. In the case of an electoral college, the electors may also choose a candidate. But that doesn’t mean that the electors choose their own candidate.

In the following post, I will show how the Electoral College system of voting can be a powerful tool and how it can make or break elections. I will also explain how the Electoral College is very powerful and how it can be used to influence elections.

I. How Does the Electoral College Vote?

The system of the Electoral College is based on the Electoral College (one of four major components of a democracy). I will use the term in reference to a body of electors called the Electoral College as its primary object. In the United States, to be the “President of the United States.”

The Electoral College electors, in the United States they serve as the presidents of the United States. In most states they are appointed by the governor-treasurer, who then decides the issues (whether the President shall be impeached or not).

The Secretary of the Treasury (and for many Presidents, both the Senate and the House of Representatives, respectively) is also elected as President, and these elections are carried out by the states. (I will call this the “state’s elections.”) In America, they are elected at least as often as the president of the nation. The President of the United States and the most recent election of the electors are called a “convention”—the Presidential “Convention” is the process by which the electors of each state are elected.

It is important to define the concept of a “convention”—i.e., the United States being the world and being the United States a federal democracy, as this means that the American people (i.e., the American citizens) are a part of one body of federal elected representatives. The United States Constitutional Convention (or so the American Constitution says—the same as the American Constitutional Convention), is the national convention that is held during the first two full weeks of January, 1887.

It is difficult therefore to define the concept of one body of representatives. The name of the convention is to be considered a symbolic reference to the three-quarters of representatives that Congress in each of the fifty states has over a two-year period. In modern times when Congress is in session to meet and to pass bills, a convention exists for the purpose of deciding the agenda. In the event that Congress does not meet before the end of this session, the national convention is held and the national bills are passed through both houses. Once the national bills are introduced, the national delegates vote on the issues raised in the national Convention; if they are not in session by the end of this session, then such matters are transferred to the national Convention under Article V. These issues may be amended at the national convention, and in those cases, the national convention becomes the National Constitution Committee.

As discussed, the concept of the general election and the use of the term convention in the United States were developed and proposed many times by the American political elite as a way to achieve state office. They were designed to have a simple and clear end. They were always discussed and debated with the people of each state by the federal state branches, at state conventions (the state legislatures of both houses of Congress at the federal level) and in national elections. They had been put to a very wide variety of popular use, so an individual state party was never a “convention”!

In the case of the United States there is no need to mention the Convention which