Unix & Windows Cost AnalysisEssay Preview: Unix & Windows Cost AnalysisReport this essayUnix has been used to develop powerful parallel supercomputers. The clusters as well as the newest kernels should be comparable to Windows on multiprocessor systems. However Unix systems are generally slower than Windows, the best way to compare Unix systems and Windows performance would be on a cost per unit of work basis. The licensing costs are typically one-time costs that are acquired at the same time the hardware is purchased. It makes sense to combine the hardware and the software costs for performance purposes. The staff related costs are ongoing with system enhancements. We compare equally Unix servers and Windows servers, including the software is extremely necessary for the hardware to have any value, in which Unix would win in a variety of performance tasks.
[PDF: 3] The two software are very different since all of the components need to perform the tasks in order to be ready to run, and you need to run the programs that you want to connect to, including the processors.
We found that only one-time usage costs can be calculated in the Linux operating system. That is, it’s very hard to estimate an operating system cost using Linux’s built-in system cost estimates of all services that run the software in question; a typical Linux system costs about $20 an hour at the operating system level. While a typical computer running Linux requires about 3,000 hours of training per week, the Linux operating system requires 4,000 hours of training per week. Therefore a typical PC is only $0.0010 to $0.0020, so the overhead of operating system cost calculations is very, very small. Moreover, the Linux architecture has one specific function, a “hardware-level CPU scheduling” method. On the other hand there are a number of other functions such as memory allocation, file-system allocation, network system execution, memory cache, and power consumption.
Since we don’t have a CPU scheduler to run the Linux software, this analysis has been done on a single Unix machine (the IBM X2540) running the Linux kernel. Since we use the X2540’s processor to do the calculations of the running program we can calculate the minimum time for which to run to compute the data for computation. Since the system is fully isolated the cost of compute takes into account the system and the OS.
[PDF: 4] It may be of interest to look at the computation time with regard to an X2540 based on its current operating system cost.
If the operating system costs are $20000 to $1020, our analysis shows that Linux costs $30000 to $30000 per hour in the Linux operating system.
[PDF: 5] As we can see, this calculation is also a cost per hour estimation. As we have learned from some research on this topic, having time to compute may reduce CPU usage while optimizing the memory and network performance of the system.
The Linux operating system is in several ways different to Windows and to Unix. It’s a completely open-source system with no proprietary kernel. You only need to connect the hardware component to the Linux interface and use the software running on the computer. For the most part this means that the operating system takes less time to execute on the hardware, but the CPU overhead still increases. Therefore the user doesn’t need to pay extra.
[PDF: 7] The Linux operating system cost per hour is much higher compared to Windows. However, it’s worth noting that Linux is not in isolation. In fact many operating systems are interconnected (and therefore require each other to do the work for each other) and it’s highly unlikely that Microsoft or Google would need more than $20 to connect a Windows server to a Linux server.
[PDF: 8] Because there are currently no specific time restrictions on computing time it may make sense to use one day rather than two hours depending on the machine, but this will not change the real cost of the program.
Linux and Windows costs are similar when compared to the cost per working day for each OS. Since they are complementary the Linux operating system costs almost no computation, with the advantage of being cheaper.
While Windows does have much higher cost per hour
Unix systems have a very large range of applications both commercial and open source. The platform is mostly built on open source applications. Unix systems have far more source applications than any operating system. There are almost no cost associated to the business needs that Unix applications cannot be met. Unix has the best and most diverse free support available out of the majority of the open source systems, which is often better than traditional commercial support. The limited support is automatically included with the purchase of any Unix box. Most major suppliers such as IBM and a variety of independent vendors provide the full support options. Ninety percent of organizations that use both Unix open source systems and Windows have determined that the costs of Unix environments are more effective under similar conditions.
Unix technology is based on a development model that limits on the revolutionary. However, Unix provides a server operating system with reliability and stability, comparable with any version of Windows.
Security is other cost factor, the default security characteristics of Unix depends on the distribution and installation. They apparently have a number of security issues as well as Windows, but they can be easily to be fixed. Unix is much less work than Windows, administrators can create systems with almost any mixture of functionality and security suitable to the server utilization.
Windows is an expensive system that typically delivers unneeded functionality, unwanted security and reliability, compared to free and/or low cost systems that the open source Unix systems can easily be made to be reliable and do what is wanted.