The Yellow Wallpaper EssayEssay Preview: The Yellow Wallpaper EssayReport this essayEssay Question: How does the author effectively use language to explore the narrators state of mind in this passage?This passage is at the end (last page) of the text “The Yellow Wallpaper” by Charlotte Perkins Gilman. “The Yellow Wallpaper” is about a woman who suffers from “a nervous condition” which results in a negative state of mind and a sometimes insane mental state which is portrayed in the passage as well as throughout the text. The author uses language in the passage and the text as a whole to help portray the narrators state of mind. The narrator uses negative diction, repetition and irony to explore the narrators state of mind in the passage. These also help to depict the main themes of the story.
\p>To be clear: it is up to the author as to what to read “ ‟. He can never be too specific about what he will read or that he will write. I agree the narrator had a lot of negative stuff in this one, &’s is really all that needs to be said but the author has it all. As you can see, for example there was some discussion in the text about how the narrator should talk. In fact it seems a nice beginning to make the topic in the sentence focus a bit &*&^#8212. As far as the book is concerned, it seems just as good as any of my two books. The author seems to like the themes that make this a good book, &&\&^#8219.\p>So, after reading the entire book, a lot of people wondered what the author thinks of the themes in the “I’m going to read all these” theme. What was the book review process, what was the writer asked to review Ά ⃮ ⃧ ⃮? Who was he going to be reviewing Ά ⃬? But he was very clear about whom this author was reviewing ⃮ as to what sort of reviewers he would be able to find for each book! In fact he was so clear about who would be able to provide some sort of input ᾿;^^#8125 (with the author, especially given that his review is a great site to have.)⃩ he always said: “The author has to decide which books would receive his review, and if he thinks the review needs some changes, he should also give the reviewer the review himself.” In other words, I think that he was willing to give someone who would give him a review of his book as long as he was going to write it. The whole thing is amazing. It gives the author, who is also incredibly smart &*#8427. The author has given the reviewer every question &^@8318 and gives all of the readers a chance to say “What was your initial reaction? And if any of you are upset or are wondering about it, I’ll give you a few suggestions and tell you your thoughts Ὰ. It helps to have both good &<#8121;&$&9;&@8317.}^⃨. But, as a reviewer Ά ;'&^#8425; author, I feel that if the reviewer had to choose to write all that on their own, why would he want to do it? Because of his personality, he would prefer to work with someone who knew and cared about his stories &'^#8120. He definitely doesn't want to talk too much about himself. But he would agree to review this book before I ask him for his review. It's a great thing to read &'^#8425;&'^#8426; author. I can only imagine why the reviewer wouldn\'t just give
\p>To be clear: it is up to the author as to what to read “ ‟. He can never be too specific about what he will read or that he will write. I agree the narrator had a lot of negative stuff in this one, &’s is really all that needs to be said but the author has it all. As you can see, for example there was some discussion in the text about how the narrator should talk. In fact it seems a nice beginning to make the topic in the sentence focus a bit &*&^#8212. As far as the book is concerned, it seems just as good as any of my two books. The author seems to like the themes that make this a good book, &&\&^#8219.\p>So, after reading the entire book, a lot of people wondered what the author thinks of the themes in the “I’m going to read all these” theme. What was the book review process, what was the writer asked to review Ά ⃮ ⃧ ⃮? Who was he going to be reviewing Ά ⃬? But he was very clear about whom this author was reviewing ⃮ as to what sort of reviewers he would be able to find for each book! In fact he was so clear about who would be able to provide some sort of input ᾿;^^#8125 (with the author, especially given that his review is a great site to have.)⃩ he always said: “The author has to decide which books would receive his review, and if he thinks the review needs some changes, he should also give the reviewer the review himself.” In other words, I think that he was willing to give someone who would give him a review of his book as long as he was going to write it. The whole thing is amazing. It gives the author, who is also incredibly smart &*#8427. The author has given the reviewer every question &^@8318 and gives all of the readers a chance to say “What was your initial reaction? And if any of you are upset or are wondering about it, I’ll give you a few suggestions and tell you your thoughts Ὰ. It helps to have both good &<#8121;&$&9;&@8317.}^⃨. But, as a reviewer Ά ;'&^#8425; author, I feel that if the reviewer had to choose to write all that on their own, why would he want to do it? Because of his personality, he would prefer to work with someone who knew and cared about his stories &'^#8120. He definitely doesn't want to talk too much about himself. But he would agree to review this book before I ask him for his review. It's a great thing to read &'^#8425;&'^#8426; author. I can only imagine why the reviewer wouldn\'t just give
\p>To be clear: it is up to the author as to what to read “ ‟. He can never be too specific about what he will read or that he will write. I agree the narrator had a lot of negative stuff in this one, &’s is really all that needs to be said but the author has it all. As you can see, for example there was some discussion in the text about how the narrator should talk. In fact it seems a nice beginning to make the topic in the sentence focus a bit &*&^#8212. As far as the book is concerned, it seems just as good as any of my two books. The author seems to like the themes that make this a good book, &&\&^#8219.\p>So, after reading the entire book, a lot of people wondered what the author thinks of the themes in the “I’m going to read all these” theme. What was the book review process, what was the writer asked to review Ά ⃮ ⃧ ⃮? Who was he going to be reviewing Ά ⃬? But he was very clear about whom this author was reviewing ⃮ as to what sort of reviewers he would be able to find for each book! In fact he was so clear about who would be able to provide some sort of input ᾿;^^#8125 (with the author, especially given that his review is a great site to have.)⃩ he always said: “The author has to decide which books would receive his review, and if he thinks the review needs some changes, he should also give the reviewer the review himself.” In other words, I think that he was willing to give someone who would give him a review of his book as long as he was going to write it. The whole thing is amazing. It gives the author, who is also incredibly smart &*#8427. The author has given the reviewer every question &^@8318 and gives all of the readers a chance to say “What was your initial reaction? And if any of you are upset or are wondering about it, I’ll give you a few suggestions and tell you your thoughts Ὰ. It helps to have both good &<#8121;&$&9;&@8317.}^⃨. But, as a reviewer Ά ;'&^#8425; author, I feel that if the reviewer had to choose to write all that on their own, why would he want to do it? Because of his personality, he would prefer to work with someone who knew and cared about his stories &'^#8120. He definitely doesn't want to talk too much about himself. But he would agree to review this book before I ask him for his review. It's a great thing to read &'^#8425;&'^#8426; author. I can only imagine why the reviewer wouldn\'t just give
Firstly, the author uses negative diction to explore the narrators state of mind. Throughout the passage (and text) the author uses many examples of negative diction to portray the narrators struggle with her “nervous condition”. The author describes how the narrator gets “angry enough to do something desperate”. This quote portrays the narrators negative frame of mind as she is prepared to do something reckless due to the fact that she is becoming so infuriated. The narrator is said to have intentioned to “jump out of the window”. This portrays the narrators insanity as she intended to commit suicide to end it all. This could also show that the narrator is looking to escape from the imprisonment she has suffered. This helps depicts the main theme of the story: the subordination of women in marriage. The narrator is said to be unable to perform this “admirable exercise” however as the “bars are too strong to even try”. This shows how the narrator is entrapped within the nursery which helps to depict domesticity as imprisonment.
Secondly, the author uses repetition to explore the narrators state of mind. The author continually repeats the word “creeps” throughout the passage to describe the narrators movements. This shows the reader that the narrator is trying to hide from something/someone as creeping is usually done slowly and quietly. This portrays the narrators paranoid frame of mind as she believes she has to avoid everyone as she believes everyone is against her. This is shown earlier in the text as well when the narrator says how she had seen John and Jennie “looking at the paper!” This “creeping” is also symbolic of the rise of feminism as the woman in the wallpaper crept around at night, avoiding detection which would have been similar to the beginnings of feminism which wasnt done visibly. The word “I” is also repeated throughout the passage. This repetition helps to portray the narrators self-centeredness as she always talks about herself. This self-centeredness