The Wagner Act
Essay Preview: The Wagner Act
Report this essay
In 1934, the Wagner Act was first introduced, also called the National Labor Relations Act (NLRB), it promised “to ensure a wise distribution of wealth between management and labor, to maintain a full flow of purchasing power, and to prevent recurrent depressions.” (Babson, p. 85) During the mid-1930s organized labor and the United States Government struck a deal. It was the time of Franklin D. Roosevelt. A volatile time, the country was attempting to recover from a depression, unemployment was at an all-time high and organized labor was struggling for its own existence. “Vast numbers of the unemployed are right on the edge,” observed Lorent Hickock, a Pennsylvania reporter hired by the federal government to report on social conditions. “It wouldnt take much to make communists out of them.” (Babson, p. 65)
This essay will highlight the argument that the NLRB wasnt a giant step for the labor, but just an attempt by the government to appease the American worker to avoid continued social unrest that lead to the development of a third political party or even a revolution. Prior to analyzing labors attempts to forge ahead one must understand the circumstances which led to the militancy amongst working Americans in the 1920s and 1930s. Organized labor experienced a decline in membership during the 1920s, an era during which labor confronted a multitude of problems which attacked it from every conceivable angle. The Woodrow Wilson administration enacted the Espionage and Sedition Acts of 1917-1918 which made it a crime to advocate draft resistance and opposition to the war, consequently thousands of Union Activists were branded as subversives and arrested or fired. In addition, the Wilson administration established the National Ware Labor Board (NWLB) to prevent strikes that might interrupt wartime production. The immergences of company unions or employee representation plans were formed in an effort to repel left winged unions. The Scientific management theory was being widely utilized, which essentially emphasized total management control over workers, dehumanizing jobs and workers.
When the World War ended in 1918, the workers who were suppressed during wartime began to fight back immediately. “Within weeks of the guns falling silent, there followed the biggest strike wave to that date in American history. More than four million workers dropped their tools and went on strike in 1919, spurred in part by inflationary price increases since 1914,” (Babson, p. 40) The most of strikes in 1919 ended in defeat for the Unions, and during the 1920s organized labor had lost much of its power. Big business now began efforts to “Americanize” foreign and native born radicals in the labor movement, and even the Supreme Court ruled that the government could not place restrictions on the hiring of child labor, could not set a minimum wage standard, or could not otherwise interfere with business operations. According to the Supreme Court, the word “picket” “suggested a sinister and militant purpose to deprive owners of their property rights.”
The late 1920s brought the stock market crash and a deep economic depression; the mass unemployment led the way for widespread social unrest. The depression reached into the homes of everyone in the country causing widespread dissatisfaction. The mass unemployment produced a “leveling in gender, ethnic, racial and occupational identities, preparing the ground for a more unified labor movement. (Babson, p. 55) As the depression began to take its toll on Americans, the dreams of prosperity and the pursuit of all the finer things in life began to disappear. Between FDRs election in November 1932 and his inauguration in March 1933, unemployment rose from a staggering 13.2 million to a massive 15.1 million workers. (Berstein, 1970) The hopes of workers turned to despair and for those whom were fortunate enough to be employed during these times, job security became the most important issue (Cowie 2003) Some scholars have indicated that the Depression was the catalyst which molded the labor movement and created unity amongst the unemployed. With no relief in sight, society had nothing to lose and everything to gain by fighting back. Workers saw that businesses and businessmen continued to get rich and mover further ahead in life, while the working class began to fall further down the economic ladder with little or no hope of advancement within society.
The solidarity amongst the unemployed is a key factor which cannot be ignored by historians and scholars, and that impetus could have propelled labor forward. For the first time, America had seen mass demonstrations across the country centering on a central issue, unemployment. Unemployment councils were prevalent within many of the major metropolitan centers across the country, and they became the proponent for the wize of the American worker. Numerous rallies and demonstrations were staged by those councils, and when it came to the issue of unemployment there were no perceived boundaries amongst citizens based on ethnicity, race or religion. The barriers which had stymied the growth of the labor movement had temporarily disappeared. However, as powerful as these councils could have been, there was no co-ordination amongst the various centers in relation to the public protest. Communities and individuals were becoming mobilized and they too began to learn the importance of being organized and working together collectively and disregarding any self imposed barriers along the lines of gender and ethnicity. Prolonged unemployment was the vehicle that extended solidarity amongst the American working class.
The opportunity to establish solidarity amongst working class Americans was favorable as workers wanted and needed change. Individuals were tired of the relentless government and corporate intervention in many of the ongoing protests concerning unemployment and other issues. Many times when the public protests intensified, either company guards or government troops would quell the masses with violence which often led to bloodshed. The demonstrations continued however, and they kept getting larger and larger. Government officials were stunned by the turnout; thirty-five thousand in New York City, fifty thousand in Chicago, and tens of thousands more in cities across American.
The working class, during the 1930s, turned to support Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR) and the Democratic Party programs which were intended to help the individual worker. FDR had promised change at his inauguration. “This nation asks for action, and action now, we must act and act quickly.” FDR proposed to implement the “New Deal”, which would provide direct relief to workers by providing