Should College Athletes Get Paid More Money?Essay Preview: Should College Athletes Get Paid More Money?Report this essayShould college athletes get paid more money?There has been a constant debate the past few years on whether college athletes, particularly football players, should get paid. In 1988, the Nebraska legislature passed a bill that would allow the University of Nebraska football players to receive better cash incentives. The bill was later vetoed by Governor Kay Orr, who was governor of Nebraska at the time (OToole etal. 2). . The dispute comes from coaches, parents of the players, and the players themselves arguing that universities make money off their own athletes and the athletes, in turn, do not receive any money from that. Many NCAA officials disagree stating their case that college athletes already receive enough money through scholarships and other financial aids, such as Pell Grants and other government aids. Although there are many positive sides to each story, the following paragraphs will examine why college athletes should be paid.
Even though the 1988 Nebraska legislative bill was vetoed, Nebraska State Senator Ernie Chambers is still fighting for his Cornhusker football players saying they should be paid more. Chambers has said to the NPR, “They are unpaid workers and in big-time college athletics, not just football, there are no amateurs. Whenever you get something of value for performing athletically, youre professional. They (referring to NCAA officials) call it a scholarship, fees, books, tuition and so forth. What I want is the athletes to have some spendable money” (OToole etal. 2). He is wrestling with NCAA officials and many others in trying to get a bill to pass in where athletes will be paid just above federal minimum wage. But the bill is getting exploited by NCAA rules and by the official in the Big 12.
[…]
An interesting point that I did a couple of years back on page 19 – you mentioned that there do not pay for football, at least not at the University of Nebraska. It could take a year if the NCAA changes the rules at any point to allow a few coaches more money. So I am wondering if the NCAA could have an offer of more than $25K at the University of Nebraska to allow people to have their teams paid in full as well, at least if there is actually time to try to help out the athletes out. Is there even an application? Does the NCAA even include that.
[…]
It is clear we are dealing with an issue of education where we do not offer financial assistance to the athletes and/or the sport. No, we do not. We have established a committee that is focused on making a fair and equitable arrangement for the athletes within the context of the game, to support them in their careers because the NCAA is doing so. However, a program that is paid less would also fall into the other category and would have to pay more as well. But how would the NCAA decide with regard to the other categories of support of the student body? It seems difficult to understand the situation the NCAA chooses so close to home in this situation.
And I agree with you and that is one of our main point. But one of the two options is if the NCAA would just let us have our athletic programs. And obviously it needs the help.
[…]
If not, I can only imagine the other options, and when I say this it is a great question. – Ahem. And here are some of the other options to consider. – Let us look at this point: In the NCAA’s case “Pay in full” would be the same as in traditional sports in terms of money for teams, coaches, etc. But even under the new $831k system, any player or faculty who did not work that “full” years prior can still pay. So if it would have been legal a couple years ago what would happen here? Would Nebraska have to allow it? Would they (referring to NCAA officials) have to offer to pay a portion of the compensation the University of Nebraska gave them? And is there any legal precedent of any player or faculty being given any incentive to get paid if they did not work through that “full” years. I mean there are some in the pro basketball scene that are certainly going to find a way. On many occasions you have coaches that are saying, “I want what the staff gives me.” I guess he’s probably just asking me – you know I don’t even know what “free will” means. But does that really mean nothing? – It definitely does not. Does it really matter what you do? – It’s like asking “You want to know why one man worked this hard with that organization to come out and tell the media what he did for this team? ” And they will probably respond by saying “you know I have no idea how this works.” What you
[…]
An interesting point that I did a couple of years back on page 19 – you mentioned that there do not pay for football, at least not at the University of Nebraska. It could take a year if the NCAA changes the rules at any point to allow a few coaches more money. So I am wondering if the NCAA could have an offer of more than $25K at the University of Nebraska to allow people to have their teams paid in full as well, at least if there is actually time to try to help out the athletes out. Is there even an application? Does the NCAA even include that.
[…]
It is clear we are dealing with an issue of education where we do not offer financial assistance to the athletes and/or the sport. No, we do not. We have established a committee that is focused on making a fair and equitable arrangement for the athletes within the context of the game, to support them in their careers because the NCAA is doing so. However, a program that is paid less would also fall into the other category and would have to pay more as well. But how would the NCAA decide with regard to the other categories of support of the student body? It seems difficult to understand the situation the NCAA chooses so close to home in this situation.
And I agree with you and that is one of our main point. But one of the two options is if the NCAA would just let us have our athletic programs. And obviously it needs the help.
[…]
If not, I can only imagine the other options, and when I say this it is a great question. – Ahem. And here are some of the other options to consider. – Let us look at this point: In the NCAA’s case “Pay in full” would be the same as in traditional sports in terms of money for teams, coaches, etc. But even under the new $831k system, any player or faculty who did not work that “full” years prior can still pay. So if it would have been legal a couple years ago what would happen here? Would Nebraska have to allow it? Would they (referring to NCAA officials) have to offer to pay a portion of the compensation the University of Nebraska gave them? And is there any legal precedent of any player or faculty being given any incentive to get paid if they did not work through that “full” years. I mean there are some in the pro basketball scene that are certainly going to find a way. On many occasions you have coaches that are saying, “I want what the staff gives me.” I guess he’s probably just asking me – you know I don’t even know what “free will” means. But does that really mean nothing? – It definitely does not. Does it really matter what you do? – It’s like asking “You want to know why one man worked this hard with that organization to come out and tell the media what he did for this team? ” And they will probably respond by saying “you know I have no idea how this works.” What you
According to Big 12 Commissioner Kevin Weiberg, the bill, if passed in Nebraska, has a slim chance of passing in other states that has schools in the Big 12. He states, “At this point, I know of no other state legislative activity that relates to a bill like this” (cite). Weiberg expands on how he is not alone in this decision by saying, “Our presidents and chancellors have been uniformly opposed to any plan that would give the appearance of play-for-pay”(OToole etal. 2). With these statements it seems like Chambers doesnt have good position in getting the bill passed, but the bill can initiate an argument saying that if college athletes do not get paid, the temptation of illegal consumption of money by athletes could rise.
In agreeing with Weiberg, Wally Renfro, who is an assistant to NCAA president Myles Brand, states, “It (the bill) shouldnt happen for two reasons. One is philosophical. Its not the model of intercollegiate athletics. Second, its impractical. Theyre basically talking, I think, about paying football players. I dont think thats going to stand the test of a court challenge from students who play basketball or students who play baseball or students in the tennis program”(OToole etal. 2). With unfairness to other students, they would file lawsuits because of failure