�Discuss The Experiences Of / Attitudes Toward Negroes In The Deep South In 1969’Essay Preview: �Discuss The Experiences Of / Attitudes Toward Negroes In The Deep South In 1969’Report this essayReconstruction of the South began when the Civil War ended in 1865. The Union employed military governments that ensured reconstruction and equality between �white and black’ Americans in the Confederate states. When the Union withdrew troops in 1877, the southerners had regained political control and rights achieved by the African Americans were undermined as gradually, the government passed laws that re-established �white power’. Although the Negro community were not forced into slavery again, their lives were not much better. The African American community faced segregation, abuse; both physical and verbal by the community and racist organisations such as the �KKK’ (Ku Klux Klan) and they were also denied basic human rights including the right to vote, freedom of speech, freedom of association and more.
African Americans were treated like they carried a deadly plague. In the South, they were segregated from the Anglo-Saxon community in almost every way possible. Public transport including railroads was, by law, segregated with all the sections, other than specified areas being unavailable to вЂ?coloured’ people. All through the towns, signs saying “White’s Only” were not uncommon, being displayed in shops, restaurants, parks, movie theatres and various other public places. As seen in the film “Mississippi Burning” the Negro community were forced to sit at isolated tables in cafД©s and it was a great shock to the community to see a вЂ?white’ person seated there. The segregation reached the extremity where the two cultures expressed their faith in different Churches. Breaching these rules / outlines of what is permissible behaviour by the African American community result in serious punishment, not by the authorities, although they would do nothing to prevent the crimes that would later be committed by the white supremacist groups.
Being pulled from your bed in the middle of the night and being beaten within an inch of your life then left to hang off a tree and die is not the ideal way to be woken up. Unfortunately, as �Mississippi Burning’ graphically depicts, many Negros who made any communication with Anglo-Saxon people or even those who did not were treated like this. Members of the Ku Klux Klan would savagely beat the African Americans for sheer enjoyment and out of pure hatred. Hatred which was not attained from bad experiences, but taught in the segregated schooling from when they were of a young age. Physical abuse of Negros occurred multiple times daily and the culprits, if caught were released with delayed sentences or dismissed of all charges. When walking in the streets, or during the
coupled service, we saw many examples of violence in the form of physical attacks on the white (or African) community. Thereafter, and especially after the initiation of segregation, a third of all American youths would be kicked out of school based on such abuse. There was a growing number of such schools when non-Negro teens began to begin to experience such abuse in the schools they attended before the integration phase. Such youth and the individuals they represented had a direct link to the White community.The Ku Klux Klan, on the other hand, was much more focused on violence (especially physical violence) and nonviolence (in the form of acts of terror or violence to people) and much more concerned with “diversity.” As a group, the Klan were quite focused on their racism and social justice. While not the exact type of organization or behavior that most modern-day Klan members would ever face. The most recent iteration of the Society was a group called the “Gustavo Kinslick Klan,” which was much larger. This group, however, was still in many ways a precursor and, more important than its current leader, Jock Kinslick, as far as he was concerned, was only a shadow organization of a major force in American KKK-led government.While many Klan members were proud of their organization and its efforts of social justice, others were not so. Though the Klan of today had always been an institution dedicated to white supremacy and institutional racism, their influence of African American political activism, their involvement in government policy affecting their communities, and their commitment to racial equality also manifested itself in their willingness to engage in “violence on the streets.” There was the very real threat of civil unrest and in the case of the Ku Klux Klan, an aggressive and brutal “gang-on-gang” mentality to get all the attention they needed. As a result, the Klan grew more visible, and the movement shifted from supporting a white victim to becoming a political force. As both a symbol and a source of political organization, the Klan was largely an institutional institution.The Klan’s membership was limited by their ability to take down social forces, build strong organizations, and achieve significant public policy goals; while the organization’s social-justice agendas were also seen by some to be on the forefront of public policy as political issues.The Klan operated under the watchful eye of the federal authorities and the state in that many blacks were considered “Negroes” and many others were “Independents,” and their participation in the Civil Rights movement became synonymous with being a civil rights militant.The KKK’s social-justice agenda was not just one of the objectives of the organization, it was also perceived as part of some of the goals of that organization, in that in recent years the KKK has gained prominence in the United States and around the world because of the racial segregationist movement.While it is extremely important to understand some of what is going on above, it is important to talk for a moment about what was going on before the