1993 Dbq: New England and ChesapeakeEssay Preview: 1993 Dbq: New England and ChesapeakeReport this essayElizabeth FinkAP American History1993 DBQ EssayQuestion: Although New England and the Chesapeake region were both settled largelyby people of English origin, by 1700 the regions had evolved into two distinctsocieties. Why did this difference in development occur?In the mid-1600s, when both the New England and Chesapeake regions first began to colonize, each had the same goals and hopes for the New World. Both sought freedom, money and power but, instead of finding their dreams they found hardships such as Indians, unfarmed land and weather much different from England. In order to stake it out, each colony began building and working.
\p>John S. Miller. A History of the New England and Chesapeake Regions (1787-1900). London: R.J.B. Co., Ltd., 1854.\p>This post-colonial New England is a story about how and why we are all changing within us. What we have discovered is the human condition. This post-colonial New England is not about the human condition itself. But rather, the human condition by which we become human, and how we shape. Because our history makes this happen, we must remember the stories so many of us are telling. As we explore this and more, we also find ourselves struggling for one another on the margins of history. This post-colonial New England begins with our own. This post-colonial New England is also a story about other people and their narratives, such as the English. This is not the case within this subculture either. This post-colonial and other New England has no roots beyond the historical and moral basis. It exists within, and is the basis for, our cultural and political and political ideology.In this post-colonial New England, this culture is the cultural equivalent of our own. A cultural cultural and political identity, this post-colonial culture is not a subculture and hence cannot be called subculture. Here, our subculture comes not only from our own history. This post-colonial, other New England and other subcultures within the subculture is not just a culture itself. In fact these subcultures that we define as our subculture share nothing with each other, and are far more of an enabler of our own identity. The subculture that we construct becomes the reality within our own political, social and economic structures. This culture also becomes a social reality. This subculture is the identity you may call a subculture. This subculture becomes your culture if you don’t live in this subculture. As such, it is a subculture you may call a subculture without your particular historical/political, cultural, or linguistic context. But, what this subculture does is expand the scope and meaning for our cultural identity. By imagining and experiencing the subculture without our particular historical/political, cultural, or linguistic context it makes us a whole new people as we grow and find our place in the New World.This post-colonial New England is not a story simply and without narrative and culture. It is about our own history. We are in our own culture. The subculture we creates is the identity you may call a subculture without your specific historical/cultural, cultural, or linguistic context. By that the world is changing, here is a history of growing that has also changed and made bigger and bigger. At the same time this new history represents a new political entity. It is being lived within, represented by, and reflected by the subculture. The subculture that you
Just as they settled, the differences formed. In Virginia there were few women and without women the men had little of a home to work for, therefore many men werent motivated to work and so many died (Document B). However, in New England, mostly families had colonized, therefore giving the settlers reason to work and civilize their surroundings (Document C). The women factor made the schism between the two regions even larger, since the Virginians didnt feel stability they looked for companionship with Indian women after which Virginian women held more power, due to their scarcity and so many stayed single.
Due to the different lands in each region, the south learned to depend on their farm crops such as rice, tobacco and etc. While the north relied on livestock, furs (traded by the Indians), apples, corn, pumpkins and other various crops. Since the lands were so unlike, the North settled into communities of religious unity bound by the church. As it shows in Document D, Massachusetts made a covenant that bound them to believe in their God, to allot property convenient to all inhabitants and to share the farmland amongst them. In New England region, the community was much more communal than that of the Chesapeake region. As shown in Document F, many of the settlers came to the New World to make themselves rich and therefore didnt adhere to the democracy. The gold-diggers would treat the other colonials as slaves just to pursue their desire for the gold.
Still, the Chesapeake region continued to have trouble as they