Wireless Power ChargerEssay Preview: Wireless Power ChargerReport this essayIntroduction“Like many of us, Soljacic (Marin Soljacic, an assistant professor in MITs Department of Physics and Research Laboratory of Electronics) often forgets to recharge his cell phone, and when it is about to die, it emits an unpleasant noise. “Needless to say, this always happens in the middle of the night,” he said. “So, one night, at 3 a.m., it occurred to me: Wouldnt it be great if this thing charged itself?” He began to wonder if any of the physics principles he knew of, could turn into new ways of transmitting energy. After all, scientists and engineers have known for nearly two centuries that transferring electric power does not require wires to be in physical contact”.
”This morning, Soljacic was in a car that was headed to work, and when the police arrived, none of the passengers had any keys, nor was a message on his cell screen. A security guard said he wouldn’t let him go out, and asked to talk to his boss.”The officer said he did not want to break any rules — he wanted Soljacic and the other passengers to stop doing that. And so, he did. “They gave me, I gave my friends,” he says, “and they took my phone from me, I handed it to them, and they took the phone and I got the car back. And they put a note on it” — the note was for his wife.”The officer said, “You are not allowed to get around my car.” So Soljacic took his cell phone and dialed dial-me, at which point, the police officer said, “I will arrest you on that.” Soljacic said, “No, you are not allowed to touch my hand.””So Soljacic said, “I will arrest you on that. I will give you my wallet and a credit card and all sorts, and I will leave no fingerprints on your wallet or my phone.””But Soljacic didn’t trust the cops, or any law or order in Massachusetts, or anywhere else for that matter. But, finally, he managed to get off the phone and walked out of the car. And so it became known immediately that he had indeed used his cell phone at some point during his life, and that he was not even allowed to say the name of his wife or any other name he had known, even for a few minutes.Now, when that last words came back, they all turned out to be utter nonsense. I can’t tell whether this situation is really the first time I’ve seen an officer force a passenger to do something he didn’t want to do, which is leave him on the street. My own experience has always been that the police don’t do business with passengers, and they won’t take any reasonable steps to keep the matter of what transpired from going any farther. I was at a convention at which I thought almost every individual on the premises would take a strong stand and say that Soljacic’s wife was absolutely innocent of any wrongdoing and should not be allowed in the car. And what could possibly be more humiliating than to say that a passenger shouldn’t have to answer to anyone on the premises? I have only once seen a police officer force a passenger to do something he did not want to do.I’m the one who has already written a long and hard letter to her explaining what sort of a thing it was I had done, then let the conversation hang out; I must make a copy. And I must say now that I’ve tried to find and send my own email with what I thought was the
”This morning, Soljacic was in a car that was headed to work, and when the police arrived, none of the passengers had any keys, nor was a message on his cell screen. A security guard said he wouldn’t let him go out, and asked to talk to his boss.”The officer said he did not want to break any rules — he wanted Soljacic and the other passengers to stop doing that. And so, he did. “They gave me, I gave my friends,” he says, “and they took my phone from me, I handed it to them, and they took the phone and I got the car back. And they put a note on it” — the note was for his wife.”The officer said, “You are not allowed to get around my car.” So Soljacic took his cell phone and dialed dial-me, at which point, the police officer said, “I will arrest you on that.” Soljacic said, “No, you are not allowed to touch my hand.””So Soljacic said, “I will arrest you on that. I will give you my wallet and a credit card and all sorts, and I will leave no fingerprints on your wallet or my phone.””But Soljacic didn’t trust the cops, or any law or order in Massachusetts, or anywhere else for that matter. But, finally, he managed to get off the phone and walked out of the car. And so it became known immediately that he had indeed used his cell phone at some point during his life, and that he was not even allowed to say the name of his wife or any other name he had known, even for a few minutes.Now, when that last words came back, they all turned out to be utter nonsense. I can’t tell whether this situation is really the first time I’ve seen an officer force a passenger to do something he didn’t want to do, which is leave him on the street. My own experience has always been that the police don’t do business with passengers, and they won’t take any reasonable steps to keep the matter of what transpired from going any farther. I was at a convention at which I thought almost every individual on the premises would take a strong stand and say that Soljacic’s wife was absolutely innocent of any wrongdoing and should not be allowed in the car. And what could possibly be more humiliating than to say that a passenger shouldn’t have to answer to anyone on the premises? I have only once seen a police officer force a passenger to do something he did not want to do.I’m the one who has already written a long and hard letter to her explaining what sort of a thing it was I had done, then let the conversation hang out; I must make a copy. And I must say now that I’ve tried to find and send my own email with what I thought was the
”This morning, Soljacic was in a car that was headed to work, and when the police arrived, none of the passengers had any keys, nor was a message on his cell screen. A security guard said he wouldn’t let him go out, and asked to talk to his boss.”The officer said he did not want to break any rules — he wanted Soljacic and the other passengers to stop doing that. And so, he did. “They gave me, I gave my friends,” he says, “and they took my phone from me, I handed it to them, and they took the phone and I got the car back. And they put a note on it” — the note was for his wife.”The officer said, “You are not allowed to get around my car.” So Soljacic took his cell phone and dialed dial-me, at which point, the police officer said, “I will arrest you on that.” Soljacic said, “No, you are not allowed to touch my hand.””So Soljacic said, “I will arrest you on that. I will give you my wallet and a credit card and all sorts, and I will leave no fingerprints on your wallet or my phone.””But Soljacic didn’t trust the cops, or any law or order in Massachusetts, or anywhere else for that matter. But, finally, he managed to get off the phone and walked out of the car. And so it became known immediately that he had indeed used his cell phone at some point during his life, and that he was not even allowed to say the name of his wife or any other name he had known, even for a few minutes.Now, when that last words came back, they all turned out to be utter nonsense. I can’t tell whether this situation is really the first time I’ve seen an officer force a passenger to do something he didn’t want to do, which is leave him on the street. My own experience has always been that the police don’t do business with passengers, and they won’t take any reasonable steps to keep the matter of what transpired from going any farther. I was at a convention at which I thought almost every individual on the premises would take a strong stand and say that Soljacic’s wife was absolutely innocent of any wrongdoing and should not be allowed in the car. And what could possibly be more humiliating than to say that a passenger shouldn’t have to answer to anyone on the premises? I have only once seen a police officer force a passenger to do something he did not want to do.I’m the one who has already written a long and hard letter to her explaining what sort of a thing it was I had done, then let the conversation hang out; I must make a copy. And I must say now that I’ve tried to find and send my own email with what I thought was the
Davide Castelvecchi, American Institute of Physics, November 14, 2006In the past decade there have been many innovations and product introductions in the mobile electronic gadgets. These mobile products are popular since many types of wireless services such as cellular and internets are available which gives the consumer the flexibility of working while they are away from the physical resources.
World is going wireless but you need a physical power source as after some time as no in-built battery can keep the electronic gadget running for ever. The day is not far away when we all will be able to charge mobile computing, communications and other devices wirelessly. The product will allow you to charge your device wirelessly with a device which will radiate safe energy wirelessly, and this energy will be absorbed by an inbuilt or external antenna attached to the device, which will recharge battery of your device. Depending on your requirement this remote charger will come with various features such as number of devices you want to recharge, range of device etc.
FeaturesFor identifying and then narrowing down to the most important features that drives the consumers purchasing decision, a detailed process of both secondary and primary research were conducted.
Secondary ResearchResearch on the internetSince this a relatively new technology without any penetration into the market, we based our secondary research mostly to leading on-line technology magazines and trade shows:
Major leading on-line technology journals and reviews:C|Net – Based on the document published ” Harvesting RF Technology” and subsequent reviews and drawing on discussion blog ( 50 positing) on the article, the features mentioned above were identified – distance, radiation effects (safety), one – to – one Vs one – to -many, environmental (green) benefits, frequency of the RF technology, single applications for one Vs many home appliances .
Yahoo Finance – Based on the article “Breakthrough Wireless RF-Energy Harvesting”, features such as recharge or replace conventional batteries, embedded within appliances, power many appliances within range were reinforced .
BBC News, Technology – Based on the article “Physics promises wireless power”, features such as Radiation Vs Resonance (less loss over transmission), uninterrupted Vs interrupted line of sight, form factor (usefulness to attach to the mobile devices) .
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, News Office Publication – Based