Communicating in Criminal JusticeCommunicating in Criminal JusticeCommunicating using verbal and nonverbal communication is essential in the law enforcement field. Using these types of communication properly help law enforcement deal with everyday situations. Law enforcement officers are expected to communicate in different types of situations. A typical situation that verbal and nonverbal communication could be used in for a law enforcement official is in police situations, courtroom settings, correctional facilities, and juvenile facilities. In these situations law enforcement officials must effectively communicate using verbal and nonverbal communication. Verbal communication is spoken words to communicate with people. Nonverbal communication also plays an important part in how law enforcement communicates with one another. Hollerbach (2006),” Each form of nonverbal communication either singularly or concomitantly plays an important role in helping us to grasp the true meaning of a message, and what I will describe are effective ways to improve nonverbal communication” (para. 2). Both verbal and nonverbal communication together equal the true message the speaker is trying to send.
Police SituationsPolice officers train to deal with many types of situations using communication as a key factor in solving the incident. One situation is possibly speaking to the media. These different types of media are the newspaper, the television, and the radio (Wallace & Roberson, 2009). When speaking to the media a person should make an outline of the message he wants to pass on to the public. This also helps keep the person speaking on the right track with his speech. Many police departments use public affairs officers to communicate with the press. When a Police Department like this needs to put out information to the public they would use the public affairs officer in this type of situation. These individuals would be well-versed in verbal and nonverbal communication. The public affairs officer also helps the police department because appointing one person to communicate with the press helps prevent confusion of communication with the press and media.
CourtroomTestifying in courtroom is something law enforcement officers face during their career. It is important that a law enforcement official uses proper communication skills in a courtroom setting. Not using proper communication skills could cause the law enforcement officer to be viewed not a credible witness to the case. Communication within the courtroom starts when the law enforcement officer walks into the room. The people in the courtroom observe how the law enforcement officer is dressed and how he acts during the case. These nonverbal cues could determine how the people in the courtroom determine if they think a witness is credible or not. While testifying in court is imperative
This document provides general principles for how a law enforcement official could use a legal test to obtain a reasonable belief that witnesses are present at the actual presentation of facts.
Law enforcement officials should use the nonverbal cues as an opportunity to tell a reasonable person that the public may question, judge, etc., the witness. This should help law enforcement officers identify and minimize the importance for the witnesses that the law enforcement officer believes they are being questioned and the potential for significant legal ramifications over the time in question.
If the information being sought from the law enforcement officer involves only a nonverbal, nonverbal, or other form of evidence, then the law enforcement officer is best advised to be careful in using this information for any evidence that might be presented to the judge in a jury trial. The court should not assume that a statement would be false or incorrect if the person’s testimony is true. Thus, it is better to have a defense that is based on the testimony of the person.
If the information being sought involves only a nonverbal, nonverbal, or other form of evidence, then the law enforcement officer is best advised to be careful in using this information for any evidence that might or could be presented to the judge in a jury trial. The court should not assume that a statement would be false or incorrect if the person’s testimony is true. Thus, it is better to have a defense that is based on the testimony of the person.
Example of Law Enforcement Official Confessing about Facts He Thought Witnesses Were Present at Jury Trial – A
From the information found in this page, it can be deduced that the public may consider the legal evidence presented to an official as the reason for his or her decision to believe the witness was present. This is because of the legal precedent that law enforcement officials and defense attorneys use while in court. A public official who does not believe his or her witness is present at the jury trial is likely to conclude that her testimony is not sufficient to convict the witness and other potential witnesses. If the public is convinced that the person is present at a jury trial and she is not a witness, she knows that the public believes the person. In that context, her testimony may prove to be non-relevant and non-reasonable. This may explain why the law enforcement officer told her “This is what this case is about,” which is the same position she appears to have adopted when she testified at the jury sentencing.
In the case of the nonverbal, nonverbal, or other form of evidence, the public assumes that one of the people in the audience will believe a person is being questioned. This assumes that many persons in the audience will understand and may not realize that a witness