Individual ProjectEssay Preview: Individual ProjectReport this essayUmbreit and Bradshaw (2003) conducted this study because there was need for the evaluation of victim satisfaction, so as to provide input into the restorative justice process for victims. The information collected about victim satisfaction provides feedback about program services, able to identify bottlenecks in the programme and provide information that helps to increase knowledge about the process of mediated dialogue aiming at victim services. The VSODS aims to measure victim satisfaction with offender dialogue through psychometric development of an instrument. The VSODS consists of 11 questions about various aspects of satisfaction of victims on a four point scale.
Participants, interviewed once a month, followed the programme for an average of three weeks. After two weeks, participants completed one or more questions with the program or had their questionnaire question validated, followed by two or more questions completed by the programme. In order to avoid being interviewed more frequently, the participants completed a short short time session with a partner to discuss their experience with the programme. Participants who completed more than one question at a time scored higher than those with participants who completed fewer questions. The questionnaire-based assessments were administered through a three point test of validity of the participant’s subjective self-value. To validate the accuracy of the interviewer’s questions, the participants completed the same survey once a month and participated in the programme for one-month.
The following year, the VSODS was discontinued due to the publication date problems. The University of London Medical Center (USLMC) published an initiative to improve the clinical approach to counselling the public over the Internet through the VSODS. The project began in 2008 and received support from funding sources from the European Commission (EPI) for ongoing and ongoing research purposes. The objective of the project is to assess the potential of online peer forums to help to further the understanding of the role online social networking groups play in counselling. By collecting sample questions related to victim experiences, participants have a better chance of answering their survey questions. The focus of the project is to help improve the online form of counselling by providing better communication in its entirety, as well as providing a more comprehensive approach for the prevention and treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder and other issues related to social movement and emotional distress.
The approach developed with the support of E.C.L. to make the VSODS available for unrestricted access to research purposes. One study (Puerto Rico), which provided objective research for online community research groups, has shown that the link between online social networking group member’s and post-traumatic experience (PTSD) remains strong. This study aims to further develop this connection and provides a greater insight into the effect of online social networking groups on post-traumatic experience.
2.4 Question (1–5)
Individual ProjectEssay Preview: Individual ProjectReport
Individual ProjectEssay Preview. This question contains information about the quality of the victim information collected in a confidential and confidential context, as well as all related issues, that affect participants in the programme. The VSODS does not take into account the relationship of victim and offender’s relationship to victim satisfaction and does not consider the relationship of victim to offender satisfaction as a whole.
H1 Subject
Individual ProjectEssay Preview
H1 Subject
H1 Subject
Individual ProjectReport
Individual ProjectEssay Preview.
The VSODS is a series of 4 basic questionnaires that assess the quality of the information collected in relation to current victim and offender experience.
H2 Question
Individual ProjectEssay Participant
Oscar
Subject Amber
The subject will describe the program provided by the participant, the time spent with the client, the victim, and other aspects of the program. The subject expects any relevant information presented in the questionnaire to include:
Date of arrest/previous arrest
Name(s) of the person to whom the questionnaire is asked
Date of last arrest after which the participant intends to participate
Injury status
The offender information (including information on the age of the person present)
Injury history and/or type of injury
Participant will describe how this information is used and any appropriate course of treatment will be given to improve the victim’s satisfaction with the programme once the questionnaire is completed. The subject will also describe its purpose for recording the responses in a confidential and confidential context in order to better understand the process provided by the victim and offender. Question (6), in which a victim is asked questions about their relationship to their partner, family and community or the presence of the perpetrator is answered according to what respondent has done to them. Question (7) A victim will describe their current support and motivation to continue the programme and a pattern of problems that is repeated over the course of the study. Question (8) The victim will identify any unresolved issues that might cause them to feel less satisfied with the programme. Question (9) An offender will also identify a pattern that they have faced that could explain the difficulty of obtaining assistance from the police while at the centre. Question (10) A victim will suggest ways to mitigate the problems they have encountered while at the centre. Question (11) The offender will consider that further information about changes to the programme might be provided to enable them to make adjustments in their programme or to support their family. The victim may also ask them to refer back to the respondent’s website or to contact the programme service for assistance. Question (12) The offender will then report
2.4 Question (1–5)
Individual ProjectEssay Preview: Individual ProjectReport
Individual ProjectEssay Preview. This question contains information about the quality of the victim information collected in a confidential and confidential context, as well as all related issues, that affect participants in the programme. The VSODS does not take into account the relationship of victim and offender’s relationship to victim satisfaction and does not consider the relationship of victim to offender satisfaction as a whole.
H1 Subject
Individual ProjectEssay Preview
H1 Subject
H1 Subject
Individual ProjectReport
Individual ProjectEssay Preview.
The VSODS is a series of 4 basic questionnaires that assess the quality of the information collected in relation to current victim and offender experience.
H2 Question
Individual ProjectEssay Participant
Oscar
Subject Amber
The subject will describe the program provided by the participant, the time spent with the client, the victim, and other aspects of the program. The subject expects any relevant information presented in the questionnaire to include:
Date of arrest/previous arrest
Name(s) of the person to whom the questionnaire is asked
Date of last arrest after which the participant intends to participate
Injury status
The offender information (including information on the age of the person present)
Injury history and/or type of injury
Participant will describe how this information is used and any appropriate course of treatment will be given to improve the victim’s satisfaction with the programme once the questionnaire is completed. The subject will also describe its purpose for recording the responses in a confidential and confidential context in order to better understand the process provided by the victim and offender. Question (6), in which a victim is asked questions about their relationship to their partner, family and community or the presence of the perpetrator is answered according to what respondent has done to them. Question (7) A victim will describe their current support and motivation to continue the programme and a pattern of problems that is repeated over the course of the study. Question (8) The victim will identify any unresolved issues that might cause them to feel less satisfied with the programme. Question (9) An offender will also identify a pattern that they have faced that could explain the difficulty of obtaining assistance from the police while at the centre. Question (10) A victim will suggest ways to mitigate the problems they have encountered while at the centre. Question (11) The offender will consider that further information about changes to the programme might be provided to enable them to make adjustments in their programme or to support their family. The victim may also ask them to refer back to the respondent’s website or to contact the programme service for assistance. Question (12) The offender will then report
2.4 Question (1–5)
Individual ProjectEssay Preview: Individual ProjectReport
Individual ProjectEssay Preview. This question contains information about the quality of the victim information collected in a confidential and confidential context, as well as all related issues, that affect participants in the programme. The VSODS does not take into account the relationship of victim and offender’s relationship to victim satisfaction and does not consider the relationship of victim to offender satisfaction as a whole.
H1 Subject
Individual ProjectEssay Preview
H1 Subject
H1 Subject
Individual ProjectReport
Individual ProjectEssay Preview.
The VSODS is a series of 4 basic questionnaires that assess the quality of the information collected in relation to current victim and offender experience.
H2 Question
Individual ProjectEssay Participant
Oscar
Subject Amber
The subject will describe the program provided by the participant, the time spent with the client, the victim, and other aspects of the program. The subject expects any relevant information presented in the questionnaire to include:
Date of arrest/previous arrest
Name(s) of the person to whom the questionnaire is asked
Date of last arrest after which the participant intends to participate
Injury status
The offender information (including information on the age of the person present)
Injury history and/or type of injury
Participant will describe how this information is used and any appropriate course of treatment will be given to improve the victim’s satisfaction with the programme once the questionnaire is completed. The subject will also describe its purpose for recording the responses in a confidential and confidential context in order to better understand the process provided by the victim and offender. Question (6), in which a victim is asked questions about their relationship to their partner, family and community or the presence of the perpetrator is answered according to what respondent has done to them. Question (7) A victim will describe their current support and motivation to continue the programme and a pattern of problems that is repeated over the course of the study. Question (8) The victim will identify any unresolved issues that might cause them to feel less satisfied with the programme. Question (9) An offender will also identify a pattern that they have faced that could explain the difficulty of obtaining assistance from the police while at the centre. Question (10) A victim will suggest ways to mitigate the problems they have encountered while at the centre. Question (11) The offender will consider that further information about changes to the programme might be provided to enable them to make adjustments in their programme or to support their family. The victim may also ask them to refer back to the respondent’s website or to contact the programme service for assistance. Question (12) The offender will then report
In this study the data were collected from 197 subjects from 4 victim offender mediation program sites in the United States about their satisfaction and their demographic data. The data were summarized using the descriptive statistics such as mean and standard deviation and analyzed using principal components factor analyses.
Scoring of the VSODS is done by simply adding the scores of each item on the scale. Scale scores range from 11-44 with higher numbers indicating higher levels of victim satisfaction. In general, scores between 11 and 19 indicate dissatisfaction with services. Scores from 20-27 indicate mixed levels of dissatisfaction and satisfaction. Scores from 28-36 indicate satisfaction with services. Scores from 37-44 indicate high levels of satisfaction with services.
The average VSODS score for the total sample as 32.74 (SD = 4.6). This indicates that on the whole victims were generally satisfied with the mediated dialogue services they received. The average VSODS score ranged from 31.34 to 33.29 for the four selected sites.
The authors also said it can be used to explore differences in victim satisfaction for different groups of clients (e.g. African-American, Hispanic, Caucasian; male/female; mandatory offender participation/voluntary offender participation) by framing the null hypothesis (Ho) that the mean VSOD score is similar for male and female victims and Alternative hypothesis (H1): the mean VSOD score is different for male and female victims. The authors concluded that results of this study show that the VSODS is a useful measure of general satisfaction with victim-offender mediated dialogue services and provides a standardized measure to assess victim satisfaction in victim-offender mediated dialogue and family group conferencing programs.
Is there any difference in Criminal justice satisfaction scores between the two types offenses; mainly homicide and robbery offenders? The research question in this part of the paper is answered by framing the research hypothesis based on two populations: homicide and robbery offenders from a data set of criminal justice satisfaction survey conducted by American Intellectual Union (2004). In this study the purpose of testing of hypothesis is to help administrators and policy planners to give evidence about larger population group based on random samples.
State verbal and numerical hypothesisA statistical hypothesis is a statement about one or more population related to statistical parameters like mean or proportion. In hypothesis testing we aim at rejecting or not rejecting null hypothesis based on the random sample data. Thus in this study a hypothesis is formulated regarding the criminal justice satisfaction score between the two types of offenders.
The hypothesis is tested based on the following two population groups as under:Population 1: Homicide offendersPopulation 2: Robbery OffendersHypothesis statement:The criminal justice satisfaction score of homicide offenders is different from robbery offenders. In terms of numeric hypothesis it is stated as the mean criminal justice satisfaction score of homicide offenders is different from robbery offenders.
Let ÎĽ1 = Population mean criminal justice satisfaction score of homicide offendersÎĽ2 = Population mean criminal justice satisfaction score of robbery offendersThe above research hypothesis was tested using the five step hypothesis test (Aron, Aron, & Coups, 2009) based on AIU survey data set consisted of 25 offenders. This data set includes 9 homicide offenders and 7 robbery offenders. The data consisted of variables such as gender, type of crime, age group, length of sentence, satisfaction score regarding criminal justice system, legal services, and
Individual ProjectReport
Oscar
Subject Amber
The subject will describe the program provided by the participant, the time spent with the client, the victim, and other aspects of the program. The subject expects any relevant information presented in the questionnaire to include:
Date of arrest/previous arrest
Name(s) of the person to whom the questionnaire is asked
Date of last arrest after which the participant intends to participate
Injury status
The offender information (including information on the age of the person present)
Injury history and/or type of injury
Participant will describe how this information is used and any appropriate course of treatment will be given to improve the victim’s satisfaction with the programme once the questionnaire is completed. The subject will also describe its purpose for recording the responses in a confidential and confidential context in order to better understand the process provided by the victim and offender. Question (6), in which a victim is asked questions about their relationship to their partner, family and community or the presence of the perpetrator is answered according to what respondent has done to them. Question (7) A victim will describe their current support and motivation to continue the programme and a pattern of problems that is repeated over the course of the study. Question (8) The victim will identify any unresolved issues that might cause them to feel less satisfied with the programme. Question (9) An offender will also identify a pattern that they have faced that could explain the difficulty of obtaining assistance from the police while at the centre. Question (10) A victim will suggest ways to mitigate the problems they have encountered while at the centre. Question (11) The offender will consider that further information about changes to the programme might be provided to enable them to make adjustments in their programme or to support their family. The victim may also ask them to refer back to the respondent’s website or to contact the programme service for assistance. Question (12) The offender will then report
2.4 Question (1–5)
Individual ProjectEssay Preview: Individual ProjectReport
Individual ProjectEssay Preview. This question contains information about the quality of the victim information collected in a confidential and confidential context, as well as all related issues, that affect participants in the programme. The VSODS does not take into account the relationship of victim and offender’s relationship to victim satisfaction and does not consider the relationship of victim to offender satisfaction as a whole.
H1 Subject
Individual ProjectEssay Preview
H1 Subject
H1 Subject
Individual ProjectReport
Individual ProjectEssay Preview.
The VSODS is a series of 4 basic questionnaires that assess the quality of the information collected in relation to current victim and offender experience.
H2 Question
Individual ProjectEssay Participant
Oscar
Subject Amber
The subject will describe the program provided by the participant, the time spent with the client, the victim, and other aspects of the program. The subject expects any relevant information presented in the questionnaire to include:
Date of arrest/previous arrest
Name(s) of the person to whom the questionnaire is asked
Date of last arrest after which the participant intends to participate
Injury status
The offender information (including information on the age of the person present)
Injury history and/or type of injury
Participant will describe how this information is used and any appropriate course of treatment will be given to improve the victim’s satisfaction with the programme once the questionnaire is completed. The subject will also describe its purpose for recording the responses in a confidential and confidential context in order to better understand the process provided by the victim and offender. Question (6), in which a victim is asked questions about their relationship to their partner, family and community or the presence of the perpetrator is answered according to what respondent has done to them. Question (7) A victim will describe their current support and motivation to continue the programme and a pattern of problems that is repeated over the course of the study. Question (8) The victim will identify any unresolved issues that might cause them to feel less satisfied with the programme. Question (9) An offender will also identify a pattern that they have faced that could explain the difficulty of obtaining assistance from the police while at the centre. Question (10) A victim will suggest ways to mitigate the problems they have encountered while at the centre. Question (11) The offender will consider that further information about changes to the programme might be provided to enable them to make adjustments in their programme or to support their family. The victim may also ask them to refer back to the respondent’s website or to contact the programme service for assistance. Question (12) The offender will then report
In this study the data were collected from 197 subjects from 4 victim offender mediation program sites in the United States about their satisfaction and their demographic data. The data were summarized using the descriptive statistics such as mean and standard deviation and analyzed using principal components factor analyses.
Scoring of the VSODS is done by simply adding the scores of each item on the scale. Scale scores range from 11-44 with higher numbers indicating higher levels of victim satisfaction. In general, scores between 11 and 19 indicate dissatisfaction with services. Scores from 20-27 indicate mixed levels of dissatisfaction and satisfaction. Scores from 28-36 indicate satisfaction with services. Scores from 37-44 indicate high levels of satisfaction with services.
The average VSODS score for the total sample as 32.74 (SD = 4.6). This indicates that on the whole victims were generally satisfied with the mediated dialogue services they received. The average VSODS score ranged from 31.34 to 33.29 for the four selected sites.
The authors also said it can be used to explore differences in victim satisfaction for different groups of clients (e.g. African-American, Hispanic, Caucasian; male/female; mandatory offender participation/voluntary offender participation) by framing the null hypothesis (Ho) that the mean VSOD score is similar for male and female victims and Alternative hypothesis (H1): the mean VSOD score is different for male and female victims. The authors concluded that results of this study show that the VSODS is a useful measure of general satisfaction with victim-offender mediated dialogue services and provides a standardized measure to assess victim satisfaction in victim-offender mediated dialogue and family group conferencing programs.
Is there any difference in Criminal justice satisfaction scores between the two types offenses; mainly homicide and robbery offenders? The research question in this part of the paper is answered by framing the research hypothesis based on two populations: homicide and robbery offenders from a data set of criminal justice satisfaction survey conducted by American Intellectual Union (2004). In this study the purpose of testing of hypothesis is to help administrators and policy planners to give evidence about larger population group based on random samples.
State verbal and numerical hypothesisA statistical hypothesis is a statement about one or more population related to statistical parameters like mean or proportion. In hypothesis testing we aim at rejecting or not rejecting null hypothesis based on the random sample data. Thus in this study a hypothesis is formulated regarding the criminal justice satisfaction score between the two types of offenders.
The hypothesis is tested based on the following two population groups as under:Population 1: Homicide offendersPopulation 2: Robbery OffendersHypothesis statement:The criminal justice satisfaction score of homicide offenders is different from robbery offenders. In terms of numeric hypothesis it is stated as the mean criminal justice satisfaction score of homicide offenders is different from robbery offenders.
Let ÎĽ1 = Population mean criminal justice satisfaction score of homicide offendersÎĽ2 = Population mean criminal justice satisfaction score of robbery offendersThe above research hypothesis was tested using the five step hypothesis test (Aron, Aron, & Coups, 2009) based on AIU survey data set consisted of 25 offenders. This data set includes 9 homicide offenders and 7 robbery offenders. The data consisted of variables such as gender, type of crime, age group, length of sentence, satisfaction score regarding criminal justice system, legal services, and
Null Hypothesis And Evaluation Of Victim Satisfaction. (October 3, 2021). Retrieved from https://www.freeessays.education/null-hypothesis-and-evaluation-of-victim-satisfaction-essay/