Ofcom Review
Ofcom Review
www.ofcom.org.uk
Strategic Review of Telecommunications Phase 2 Proposals 18/11/04
Ofcom today published its proposals to support the growth of greater competition, innovation and investment certainty in the UK telecommunications sector.
The proposals are intended to prepare the ground for a new regulatory framework as the market undergoes what amounts to a move from analogue to digital; away from the switched-circuit fixed line networks of the past and towards next-generation networks based on internet protocol.
The challenge for the sector
Responses to Ofcoms Phase 1 consultation (published 28 April 2004) and Ofcoms own research indicated the following:
The telecoms sector is changing rapidly as it moves from historical business models based on the delivery of voice calls over switched-circuit networks to business models based on the delivery of data over internet protocol networks.
These changes bring uncertainty as well as opportunity, particularly for investors; yet companies have a limited opportunity in time to make the significant, long-term commercial decisions required if they are to remain competitive in the future.
The UK telecoms market offers choice and value to the end user in a number of areas, yet despite twenty years of regulatory intervention, competition in fixed line telecoms remains fragile. Additionally, many of the advantages upon which competitors have based their businesses are being eroded, not least by the transition to next generation networks.
Consumers behaviour is changing as new technologies penetrate the mass-market. However, with growth in choice and innovation has come an increase in the potential for confusion, as consumers seek to navigate increasingly complex competitive retail markets.
In seeking to address these challenges Ofcom has identified two key problems:
Firstly, an unstable market structure in fixed telecoms, dominated by BT and with alternative providers that are, in the main, fragmented and of limited scale.
Secondly, the continuance of a complex regulatory mesh, devised over twenty years of regulation and in many areas dependent upon intrusive micro-management to achieve its purposes, yet which, in aggregate, has failed effectively to address the core issue of BTs control of the UK-wide access network.
Options for consultation
In its Phase 2 Report, Ofcom presents three options to address these issues:
Option 1: Full deregulation. Removing the existing mesh of regulation entirely and relying instead on ex post competition law to resolve complaints would significantly reduce intervention in fixed-line markets. However, given BTs continued market power, this would be unlikely to encourage the growth of greater competition and as such would not serve the best interests of the consumer.
Option 2: Enterprise Act investigation. Ofcom could investigate the market under the Enterprise Act 2002, with the potential for a subsequent referral to the Competition Commission.
Option 3: BT to deliver real equality of access. Ofcom could require BT to allow its competitors to gain genuinely equal access to its networks. This option would also require BT to commit to behavioural and organisational changes to ensure that its competitors benefited from access to products and processes which were truly equivalent to those offered to BTs own retail businesses.
The large majority of respondents to Ofcoms Phase 1 consultation suggested that Option 2 would be too disruptive and expensive, favouring instead the swift introduction of real equality of access.
Ofcom shares that view. However, if real equality of access is not delivered, Ofcom will consider an investigation under the Enterprise Act and potential subsequent referral to the Competition Commission.
Real equality of access
Ofcom is proposing that the most effective way to deliver the changes required will be for regulation to address head-on the barriers preventing competitive wholesale access to BTs network.
For twenty years, regulation has failed fully to address the problem of BT’s control of the infrastructure connecting customers to the network. Much of this infrastructure is very expensive to replicate; as such, collectively it amounts to a series of economic bottlenecks upon which BTs competitors are largely or wholly reliant. Without real equality of access to those bottlenecks, sustainable competition cannot flourish.
To date, the manner in which BT has controlled access