Declaring English as the official LanguageEssay Preview: Declaring English as the official LanguageReport this essayDeclaring English as the official languageCurrently, there is a heated topic discussed with the government over whether it is appropriate or not to make English the official language of the United States. Some may contend that English serves as a symbol to ensure the existence of a nation and it can somehow unify the whole nation, while others may contradict that English-only policy impedes the multicultural development to some extent since America is a nation of immigrants. In opposition to Jamiesons argument in “The English-Only movement: Can America Proscribe Language with a Clear Conscience?”, I favor designating English as the official language for its effect on promoting the unity of the United States, increasing the work efficiency of the government and for connecting with the globalized world.
First and foremost, making English as the official language is an essential way to unify Americans and immigrants and to improve their relationship. According to sociologists research, by speaking the same language, the cases of racial discrimination would diminish to some degree, who also claim that language, not just being a communication tool, but also has the power to connect peoples hearts and give them a sense of belonging to this country. For immigrants, the first time they set their feet on the U.S. territory indicates that they might have fully prepared to get themselves plunge into the melting pot. Similarly, former senator and presidential candidate Bob Dole agrees that “promoting English as our national language is not an act of hostility but a welcoming act of inclusion” (Jamieson, 4). Therefore, making English the official language serves as encouragement for the newcomers to learn English well, in order to adapt themselves quickly to this English dominant society. More importantly, the more newcomers become assimilated to this society, the less racial and ethnic conflicts would happen between Americans and immigrants. By sharing the same language, it is easier for them to get along well and to lead harmonious lives in this big family.
Secondly, making English the official language will largely increase the governments work efficiency by both saving time and money. The relevant statistics in” Costs of Multilingualism ” from usenglish.org show that the time devoted to interpreting and translating has tremendously lowered the working pace. Also, a great deal of money invested on the multilingual services has delayed the completion of other public service projects. After the 2008 global economic crisis, it is certainly more meaningful casting the same amount of money on constructing a new highway in comparative underdeveloped state or spending more time investigating how to stimulate economic growth in the United States. In other words, by cutting the costs of multilingualism, the government will concentrate more on
The Government
In the United States public service is an essential component of Government. Without it, many of the public services, such as education, health care, health care costs, transportation, the elderly, roads, and even housing and education will not be able to absorb an increasing proportion of the growing population. This result is even more evident in the recent growth in health care spending per capita of $26,723 in 2010. There are many other ways that States could and must reduce or eliminate the problems that result from poor public services like education, housing, roads, and education spending.
The US government has spent thousands of dollars on education, hospitals, construction, and public transportation in its last fiscal year–$1.6B less per capita than was needed in 2010.
The Administration
The President, who was elected President of the United States in 2008 and has a B.A. in Management Management Education, will be responsible for the following departments and their activities:
Education: $23,713.75 for 2010.
Education spending: $24,924.95 for 2010.
Education funding: $11,084.90 for 2010.
To address gaps between education and employment, the Administration is proposing a series of policy initiatives and activities to address the issues that threaten the U.S. public’s access to government jobs. In each of these locations, public servants will be responsible directly for educating, training, preparing and providing public service skills–including education, health care, transportation, the elderly, and employment. In order to make the government more efficient, the Administration is proposing increasing funding for the American Council on Education (ACET)–the National Council on Education. The Council supports the following priorities:
A strong U.S. public schools system that promotes quality high school education. This includes low-cost alternative schools, and a high enrollment rate of high school graduates. Low-cost alternatives to high-cost public schools typically provide low level of funding and do not provide more competitive and meaningful opportunities to educate students more efficiently. Public Sector Education: The President is proposing to provide up to $14 billion for a new public sector program that can serve over a decade. The President is proposing to invest up to $6 billion over the next ten years in new public sector apprenticeship programs for low-income children. Under this plan, the Government is already investing $60 billion to create a National Career Development Center (NCDC), a national high school diploma center, a Career Development Center for high school diplomas through a process designed to enhance the recruitment of high school dropouts and improve their skills in high schools. The President will also bring in thousands of additional personnel to run and supervise the program through the Administration. Programs will allow Americans to learn and perform in a more competitive manner in a country that has historically ranked number two in job creation. Education
The President will also pursue ways to increase the quality of American higher education for the 2018 fiscal year as well as for the 2026 fiscal year. These reforms include:
Expanding Pell Grant funding
Extending, increasing and expanding the National Research and Development Program.