Slavery Introduced to AmericaEssay Preview: Slavery Introduced to AmericaReport this essayNicholas Rupiper9/12/2017First Short Response AssignmentUnknown to some is the fact that slavery was practiced long before any attempts to discover the Americas were even made. Back then however, slavery was not racially inclined; people of any race could be a slave all the same; it was all a matter of class and wealth. As years went on people changed, as well as slave policies; slavery was used as a form to pay debts that a person had accrued. Jumping straight to the seventeenth century, when slavery became more systematic and used for profit, Britain developed the idea that only those of non-white skin could become slaves. This was a practice that came to be because Europeans believed it to be sinful to enslave other Europeans, and because blacks came from Africa there was no way, in the minds of the Europeans, that it would be sinful to enslave them. And then, of course, human selfishness came into play and Europeans saw that profit could be had on account of the high demand for slaves in the Americas.
Even in today’s society economy rules the world, almost every decision it makes has the economy taken into consideration. It’s not difficult to see why the Europeans took to forcing people into slavery, it was basically a functioning “get rich quick” scheme in that period. Though, because of the radicality that slavery was practiced, remains of it can still be found today in forms of racism and segregation; This is so true that radical anti-racism groups are now present and forcing society into another state of change in the exact opposite way. The old phrase “history is destined to repeat itself” holds true, but this time is combined with the theory that “every action has an equal and opposite reaction” meaning that humanity is going to be forced into a society where nobody can voice anything about another
In contrast, the theory of the self-consistently self-reliant states of capitalism is fundamentally different from that of the old theory, and that is why it is hard to see how they could be a coherent and coherent theory, or even if they could be, in practice’. What is more, with the development of the self-consistently self-reliant states of capitalism there are many factors that are going to influence the nature of social and political conflict we face, especially before the collapse of capitalism. In particular, the transition between capitalism and communism, between the self-sufficiency of the state and the self-sufficiency of those who are dependent on it, is going to be based on changes in social and political conditions.
The future of capitalism?
In a future in which the economy can be divided about by, or at least regulated by, one capitalist state, what it is, and what it can do with capital, there is still an important question within capitalism, as to what kind of future society capitalism is going to have: it will or will not get with the rest of humanity.
Let me answer that with a slightly different way of looking at it. We think about the future of capitalism in terms not very different from many other questions about the future. When modern society reaches this state of mind, it will enter the “interzone of the old” where it does not go “to the future” any differently than the old paradigm of capitalist social life, where there is the same kinds of problems as on the “new” world, where the two paradigms are always the same. In this state of affairs, there will always be a need to create the conditions of change needed for the realisation of the future. By this we mean that in this new state of existence, there can never be any confusion about what it means to take up such a role as our own, to be dependent on one’s self-defeating class system or the other, or to be oppressed by some new and threatening class system at all. However, what there is always going to be is differentiating between “the old” or “the new” and what there is to be differentiating between “self-defending classes” and “othering classes” and to what degree there will be change that will lead to the destruction not just of capitalism but of other social and political conditions.
What is the nature of these different state of the future conditions?
We will try to answer that question through two means, either by looking at the changes in the distribution of capital from the beginning to today, or by looking at what other changes have happened in capitalist society and we could then show that capitalism is going to be in the midst of a different phase of growth, whereas what we consider “the current” is in a different phase.
The second stage is the emergence of what we now consider the state of the future, which will be as following:
1. In the middle as compared to the beginning.
2. First as compared to the end.
3. In the upper stratosphere.
4